Abstract
Proposed introduction of the ad valorem tax on the real estate market makes it necessary to perform mass appraisal of the real estates. The goal of the chapter was verification of usefulness of econometric and statistical methods in the mass appraisal process. Exponential econometric model and partial τB Kendall correlation coefficients were applied to identify the impact of attributes and location on unit real estate price. The so-called Szczecin algorithm of real estate mass appraisal was the basis in both econometric and statistical approach. Accuracy of both approaches was checked by means of percentage error (PE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) distributions. Real database containing information about 113 transactions with undeveloped land for housing purposes in Szczecin was used. The research results suggest that both methods can be used for real estate mass appraisal; however, the econometric approach gave slightly better results.
The work is financed by the National Centre of Science within the scope of project No. 2017/25/B/HS4/01813.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the chapter, significance level is equal to 0.05.
References
Benjamin, J.D., Randall, S., Guttery, R.S., Sirmans, C.F.: Mass appraisal: an introduction to multiple regression analysis for real estate valuation. J. Real Estate Pract. Educ. 7(1), 65–77 (2004)
Bourassa, S.C., Cantoni, E., Hoesli, M.: Predicting house prices with spatial dependence: a comparison of alternative methods. Paper presented at the 15th Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES), Sydney, Australia, 18–21 Jan 2009
Dell, G.: Regression, critical thinking, and the valuation problem today. Apprais. J. 85(3), 217–230 (2017)
Doszyń, M.: Statistical determination of impact of property attributes for weak measurement scales. Real Estate Manag. Valuat. 25(4), 75–84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-0031
Doszyń, M., Hozer, J.: Szczeciński algorytm masowej wyceny nieruchomości—podejście ekonometryczne (Szczecin’s algorithm of real estate mass valuation—econometric approach). Stud. Pr. WNEiZ US 50(1), 19–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18276/sip.2017.50/1-02
Han, L., Zhu, J.: Using matrix of thresholding partial correlation coefficients to infer regulatory network. BioSystems 91, 158–165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.08.008
Hozer, J., Foryś, I., Zwolankowska, M., Kokot, S., Kuźmiński, W.: Ekonometryczny algorytm masowej wyceny nieruchomości gruntowych (Econometric Algorithm of Land Properties Mass Valuation). Katedra Ekonometrii i Statystyki Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Stowarzyszenie Pomoc i Rozwój, Szczecin (1999)
Isakson, H.R.: The review of real estate appraisals using multiple regression analysis. J. Real Estate Res. 15(2), 177–190 (1998)
Kauko, T., D’amato, M. (eds.): Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd (2008)
Kilpatrick, J.: Expert systems and mass appraisal. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 29(4/5), 529–550 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/14635781111150385
Kolenda, M.: Taksonomia numeryczna. Klasyfikacja, porządkowanie i analiza obiektów wielocechowych (Numerical Taxonomy: Classification, Ranking and Analysis of Multivariable Objects). Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław (2006)
Lis, C.: Wykorzystanie metod ekonometryczno-statystycznych w procesie masowej wyceny nieruchomości lokalowych (Application of econometric and statistical methods in the process of mass valuation of residential properties). Typescript, doctor’s thesis, Uniwersytet Szczeciński (2003)
McCluskey, W.J., McCord, M., Davis, P.T., Haran, M., McIllhatton, D.: Prediction accuracy in mass appraisal: a comparison of modern approaches. J. Prop. Res. 30(4), 239–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2013.781204
Pace, R.K., Gilley, O.W.: Estimation employing a priori information within mass appraisal and hedonic pricing models. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 3, 55–72 (1990)
Pagourtzi, E., Assimakopoulos, V., Hatzichristos, T., French, N.: Real estate appraisal: a review of valuation methods. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 21(4), 383–401 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780310483656
Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., Davis, J.L., Sauber, S.B.: Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behav. Ther. 42(2), 284–299 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Zurada, J., Levitan, A.S., Guan, J.: A comparison of regression and artificial intelligence methods in a mass appraisal context. J. Real Estate Res. 33(3), 349–388 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doszyń, M., Dmytrów, K. (2020). Quantitative Methods in Real Estate Mass Appraisal. In: Nermend, K., Łatuszyńska, M. (eds) Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics. CMEE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30250-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30251-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)