Abstract
The assumptions of behavioural economics, about cognitive biases, heuristics, and observations that sometimes individuals are not the best judges of their own well-being, are now being used in the paternalist libertarian approach. It is the basis for creating a behavioural public policy. Previous experience in its implementation has allowed the development of strategies for policy and regulatory design. Applying this approach should lead to increasing the efficiency of the public policy, often thanks to quite small, simple and not too expensive interventions. The aim of the study is to analyse the existing possibilities of using the achievements of behavioural economics in the public policy with reference to the strategy of creating and conducting behavioural public interventions. This aim was achieved thanks to the application of critical literature analysis and desk research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This concept triggered a broad discussion both in the environment of scientists and public policy practitioners who presented both criticism and support. See e.g. [4â13]. The subject of the present study is not an additional voice in this discussion, and therefore, the discussion is not presented.
- 2.
This is the process of âapplying techniques that intervene in and alter the situation that produces the boundedly rational behaviour, without operating on the degree of motivation or effort an actor brings to the taskâ [30, p. 16].
References
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, New York (2011)
Q&A with Richard Thaler.: In: Samson, A. (ed.) The Behavioral Economics Guide 2016 (with an introduction by Gerd Gigerenzer), pp. 23â24. Available via http://www.behavioraleconomics.com (2016)
Thaler, R.H.: Misbehaving: the Making of Behavioral Economics. W.W. Norton, New York (2015)
Mitchell, G.: Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 99(3), 1245â1277 (2004)
Smith, M.A., McPherson, M.S.: Nudging for equality: values in libertarian paternalism. Admin. Law Rev. 61(2), 323â342 (2009)
Schlag, P.: Nudge, choice architecture and libertarian paternalism. Michigan Law Rev. 108(6), 913â924. Available via https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1278&context=mlr (2010)
VallgĂ„rda, S.: Nudge a new and better way to improve health? Health Policy 104(2), 200â203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.013
White, M.D.: The richness of personal interests: a neglected aspect of the nudge debate. LSE British Politics & Policy, 23 Oct. Available via https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-richness-of-personal-interests-a-neglected-aspect-of-the-nudge-debate/ (2013a)
Mills, Ch.: Why Nudges matter: a reply to goodwin. Politics 33(1), 28â36 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01450.x
White, M.D.: The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2013)
Lunn, P.: Regulatory policy and behavioural economics. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264207851-en
Persad, G.: Libertarian Patriarchalism: Nudges, Procedural Roadblocks, and Reproductive Choice. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works 1508. Womenâs Rights Law Reporter 35(3/4), 273â298. Available via https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1508 (2014)
Schweizer, M.: Nudging and the principle of proportionalityâobliged to Nudge? Available via https://www.academia.edu/37264133/Nudging_and_the_principle_of_proportionality_-_obliged_to_nudge (2015)
Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. Yales University Press, New Haven, CT (2008)
Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Libertarian Paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(2), 175â179. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001. Available via http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/000282803321947001 (2003)
Sunstein, C.R., Thaler, R.H.: Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. Univ. Chic. Law Rev 70(4), 1159â1202. Available via https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5228&context=uclrev (2003)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 30, 453â458 (1981)
Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R., Balz, J.: Choice architecture. In: Shafir, E. (ed.) The Behavioral Foundations Of Public Policy, pp. 428â439. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Gordon, W.: Behavioural economics and qualitative researchâa marriage made in heaven? Int. J. Market Res. 53(2), 2â12 (2011)
Hansen, P.G.: The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: does the hand fit the glove? Eur. J. Risk Regul. 7(1), 155â174 (2016)
Oliver, A.: From Nudging to budging: using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy. J. Soc. Policy 42(4), 685â700 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000299
Sunstein, C.R.: Why Nudge? the Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014)
Sunstein, C.R.: The Ethics of Influence. Government in the Age of Behavioral Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Olejniczak, K., Ćliwowski, P.: Towards behaviorally informed public interventions. Manag. Bus. Admin. Cent. Eur. 23(2), 61â91 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7206/mba.ce.2084-3356.142
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Vlaev, I.: MINDSPACE: influencing behaviour through public policy. Institute for Government, London, UK. Available via https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE-Practical-guide-final-Web_1.pdf (2010)
Dolan, P.: Influencing the financial behaviour of individuals: the mindspace way. In: Oliver, A. (ed.) Behavioural Public Policy, pp. 191â208. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., Vlaev, I.: Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 264â277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009
John, P., Cotterill, S., Richardson, L., Moseley, A., Smith, G., Stoker, G., Wales, C.: Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Using Experiments to Change Civic Behavior. Bloomsbury Academic, London, New York (2011)
Jones, R., Pykett, J., Whitehead, M.: Changing behaviours. On the rise of the psychological state. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2013)
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.R.: Debiasing through law. Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, economics and business discussion paper series 495. Available via http://lsr.nellco.org/harvard_olin/495 (2004)
John, P.: How far to Nudge? assessing behavioral public policy. Series: new horizons in public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, US. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430557 (2018)
Halpern, D.: Inside the Nudge unit. WH Allen, London (2015)
Service, O., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., Algate, F., Gallagher, R., Nguyen, S., Ruda, S., Sanders, M., Pelenur, M., Gyani, A., Harper, H., Reinhard, J., Kirkma, E.: EAST. Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. The Behavioral Insight Team UK, Behavioural Insights Ltd. Available via http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/ (2014)
OECD: Behavioural insights and new approaches to policy design. The views from the field Summary of an international seminar. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available via https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights-summary-report-2015.pdf (2015)
Halpern, D., Sanders, M.: Nudging by government: progress, impact, and lessons learned. Behav. Sci. Policy 2(2), 53â65 (2016)
Pykett, J., Howell, R., Lilley, R., Jones, R., Whitehead, M.: Governing mindfully: shaping policy makersâ emotional engagements with behaviour change. In: Jupp, E., Pykett, J., Smith, F.M. (eds.) Emotional States: Sites and Spaces of Affective Governance, pp. 69â88. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY (2017)
Goldin, J.: Which way to Nudge? uncovering preferences in the behavioral age. Yale Law J. 125, 226â270 (2015)
World Bank: Mind, Society, and Behavior. World Bank Group, Washington DC (2015)
Lourenço, J.S., Ciriolo, E., Almeida, S.R., Troussard, X.: Behavioural insights applied to policy: European report 2016. EUR 27726 EN. https://doi.org/10.2760/903938 (2016)
OECD: Behavioural insights and public policy: lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270480-en (2017)
Krijnen, J.M.T., Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C.R.: Choice architecture 2.0: behavioral policy as an implicit social interaction. Behav. Sci. Policy 3(2), 1â18 (2017)
Sunstein, C.R., Reisch, L.A., Rauber, J.: A worldwide consensus on Nudging? not quite, but almost. Regul. Gov. 12, 3â22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12161
Sudgen, R.: Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles? Int. Rev. Econ. 64, 113â123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0264-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
MiĆaszewicz, D. (2020). Designing Public Policy According to Achievements of Behavioural Economics. In: Nermend, K., ĆatuszyĆska, M. (eds) Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics. CMEE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30250-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30251-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)