Abstract
Based on contemporary debates about the possibilities and limits of scientific generalization and efforts of epistemological renewal, the chapter delineates three major approaches to generalization in psychological research: (1) numerical generalization, generalizing through representative samples, (2) post-generalizing traditions, conceiving generalization not as a decisive goal in scientific work, and (3) situated generalization, generalizing through subjectivity-in-context. The chapter argues for a theoretical and methodological vocabulary which systematically includes the subjective dimension of human life in psychological inquiry and situates the processes of generalization in persons’ common, social, cultural, and material practices of everyday living. Reconsidering the challenge of psychology to include human subjectivity and everyday life in the production of scientific knowledge, it shows how psychologies of human subjectivity permeate the history of psychology from the very beginning. Within these traditions significant perspectives contributing to the formation of a situated generalization are identified, and finally summaries of the chapters of the book are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Axel, E., & Højholt, C. (2019). Subjectivity, conflictuality and generalization in social praxis. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 23–40). New York: Springer.
Bang, J. (2019). On the worldliness of the general. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 101–114). New York: Springer.
Beckstead, Z., Cabell, K., & Valsiner, J. (2009). Generalizing through conditional analysis: Systemic causality in the world of eternal becoming. Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11, 65–80.
Brinkmann, S. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in everyday life. London: Sage.
Brinkmann, S. (2015). Empirical philosophy: Using your everyday life in theoretical psychology. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 409–423). New York: Wiley.
Brock, A. (2016). The universal and the particular in psychology and the role of history in explaining both. In S. H. Klempe & R. Smith (Eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology (pp. 29–46). Cham: Springer.
Chimirri, N. A., & Schraube, E. (2019). Rethinking psychology of technology for future society: Research practice from within everyday life. In K. O’Doherty, L. Osbeck, E. Schraube, & J. Yen (Eds.), Psychological studies of science and technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dafermos, M. (2019). Developing a dialectical understanding of generalization: An unfinalized dialogue between Vygotsky and Davydov. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 61–77). New York: Springer.
Davydov, V. V. (1984). Substantial generalization and the dialectical-materialist theory of thinking. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Dege, M. (2019). Rethinking generalization with Kurt Lewin and action research. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 41–60). New York: Springer.
Demuth, C. (2017). Generalization from single cases and the concept of double dialogicality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9399-1.
Dreier, O. (2007). Generality and particularity of knowledge. In V. van Deventer, M. Terre Blanche, E. Fourie, & P. Segalo (Eds.), Citizen city: Between constructing agent and constructed agent (pp. 188–196). Concord: Captus University Publications.
Dreier, O. (2016). Conduct of everyday life: Implications for critical psychology. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 15–33). London: Routledge.
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183–201). New York: Routledge.
Hess, D. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Hodgetts, D., Stolte, O., Drew, N., Sonn, C., Nikora, L. W., & Carr, S. (2020). Social psychology and everyday life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Højholt, C. & Kousholt, D. (2019). Developing knowledge through participation and collaboration: Research as mutual learning processes. Annual Review of Critical Psychology.
Højholt, C., & Schraube, E. (2016). Toward a psychology of everyday living. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.
Holzkamp, K. (1991). Experience of self and scientific objectivity. In C. W. Tolman & W. Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp. 65–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holzkamp, K. (2013a). Missing the point: Variable psychology’s blindness to the problem’s inherent coherence? In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (A. Boreham & U. Osterkamp, Trans.) (pp. 60–74). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2013b). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (A. Boreham & U. Osterkamp, Trans.) (pp. 233–341). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holzkamp, K. (2016). Conduct of everyday life as a basic concept of critical psychology. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 65–98). London: Routledge.
Jensen, U. J. (1999). Categories in activity theory: Marx’s philosophy just-in-time. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 79–99). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lave, J. (2019). Learning and everyday life: Access, participation, and changing practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, J. A., Dodds, A. E., & Valsiner, J. (2004). The many faces of everyday life: Some challenges to the psychology of cultural practice. Culture & Psychology, 10(4), 455–476.
Leontyev, A. N. (2009). Problems of the development of the mind. Pacifica: Marxists Internet Archive.
Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in con-temporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Muchow, M., & Muchow, H. H. (2015). The life space of the urban child. In G. Mey & H. Günther (Eds.), The life space of the urban child: Perspectives on Martha Muchow’s classical study (pp. 63–146). New Brunswick: Transaction.
O’Doherty, K., Osbeck, L., Schraube, E., & Yen, J. (Eds.). (2019). Psychological studies of science and technology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., Mahmoud, M. I., & Laurance, W. F. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67(12), 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125
Røn Larsen, M. (2016). “May I please tell you a little anecdote?”: Inter-professional decision-making about inclusion in the borderland between normal and special schooling. International Journal on School Disaffection, 12(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJSD.12.1.04.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique. Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817–833.
Schraube, E. (2013). First-person perspective and sociomaterial decentering: Studying technology from the standpoint of the subject. Subjectivity, 6(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.28.
Schraube, E., & Højholt, C. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology and the conduct of everyday life. London: Routledge.
Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, W. (1900). Die psychologische Arbeit des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, insbesondere in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie und Pathologie, 2(6), 413–436.
Stern, W. (1911). Die Differenzielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen. Leipzig: Barth.
Stern, W. (1938). General psychology: From the personalistic standpoint (H. D. Spoerl, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Tateo, L. (2013). Generalization as creative and reflective act: Revisiting Lewin’s conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 23(4), 518–536.
Tateo, L. (2016). The nature of generalization in psychology. In G. Marsico, R. Andrisano Ruggieri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), Reflexivity and psychology (pp. 45–64). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Teo, T. (2009). Philosophical concerns in critical psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 36–53). London: Sage.
Teo, T. (2015). Historical thinking as a tool for theoretical psychology: On objectivity. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 135–150). New York: Wiley.
Teo, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291.
Tolman, C. (1989). The general psychological crisis and its comparative psychological resolution. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2(3), 197–207.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2015). Generalization is possible only from a single case (and from a single instance): The value of a personal diary. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts (pp. 233–243). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Valsiner, J. (2019). Generalization in science: Abstracting from unique events. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 79–98). New York: Springer.
Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama manifesto. New York: Springer.
Vygotzky, L. S. (1927/1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3. Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology (R. van der Veer, Trans.) (pp. 233–243). New York: Plenum Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schraube, E., Højholt, C. (2019). Introduction: Subjectivity and Knowledge – The Formation of Situated Generalization in Psychological Research. In: Højholt, C., Schraube, E. (eds) Subjectivity and Knowledge. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29977-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29977-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29976-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29977-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)