Abstract
Architectural design problems can be quite involved, as there is a plethora of – usually conflicting – criteria that one has to address in order to find an optimal, performative solution. Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) techniques can thus prove very useful, as they provide solution spaces which can traverse the different trade-offs of convoluted design options. Nevertheless, they are not widely used as (a) they are computationally expensive and (b) the resulting solution space can be proven difficult to visualize and navigate, particularly when dealing with higher dimensional spaces. This paper will present a system, which merges bespoke multi-objective optimization with a parametric CAD system, enhanced by supercomputing, into a single, coherent workflow, in order to address the above issues. The system architecture ensures optimal use of existing compute resources and enables massive performance speed-up, allowing for fast review and delivery cycles. The application aims to provide architects, designers and engineers with a better understanding of the design space, aiding the decision-making process by procuring tangible data from different objectives and finally providing fit (and sometimes unforeseen) solutions to a design problem. This is primarily achieved by a graphical interface of easy to navigate solution spaces of design options, derived from their respective Pareto fronts, in the form of a web-based interactive dashboard. Since understanding high-dimensionality data is a difficult task, multivariate analysis techniques were implemented to post-process the data before displaying it to end users. Visual Data Mining (VDM) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques were incorporated to facilitate knowledge discovery and exploration of large sets of design options at an early design stage. The system is demonstrated and assessed on an applied design case study of a master-planning project, where the benefits of the process are more evident, especially due to its complexity and size.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Branke, J., Schmeck, H., Deb, K., Reddy, S.M.: Parallelizing multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: cone separation. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753), pp. 1952–1957. IEEE (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2004.1331135
Brown, N., Tseranidis, S., Mueller, C.: Multi-objective optimization for diversity and performance in conceptual structural design. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), Future Visions, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 17–20 August 2015 (2015). http://digitalstructures.mit.edu/files/2015-09/ncb-iass-paper-final.pdf
Chaszar, A., von Buelow, P., Turrin, M.: Multivariate interactive visualization of data in generative design. In: Ramtin, A., Chronis, A., Hanna, S., Turrin, M. (eds.), SimAUD, London (2016)
Durillo, J.J., Nebro, A.J.: jMetal: a Java framework for multi-objective optimization. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42(10), 760–771 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.014
Fielding, R.T.: Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architecturese. University of California, Irvine (2000). http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm
Harding, J.: Dimensionality reduction for parametric design exploration. In: Adriaenssens, S., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Menges, A., Pauly, M. (eds.), Advances in Architectural Geometry 2016, pp. 204–221. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zurich, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.3218/3778-4_19
Keough, I., Benjamin, D.: Multi-objective optimization in architectural design. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference. Orlando, Florida, USA (2010)
Kicinger, R., Arciszewski, T., DeJong, K.: Evolutionary design of steel structures in tall buildings. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 19(3), 223–238 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19:3(223).
Kyropoulou, M., Ferrer, P., Subramaniam, S.: Optimization of intensive daylight simulations: a cloud-based methodology using HPC (High Performance Computing). In: PLEA 2018 HONG KONG Smart and Healthy within the 2-degree Limit. Hong Kong (2018). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329718843_Optimization_of_Intensive_Daylight_Simulations_A_Cloud-based_Methodology_using_HPC_High_Performance_Computing
Mueller, C., Ochsendorf, J.: An integrated computational approach for creative conceptual structural design. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium 2013, pp. 1–6 (2013)
Mueller, V.: Second Generation Prototype of a Design Performance Optimization Framework, April 2015 (2015)
Müller, P., et al.: Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Trans. Graph. 25(3), 614 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911.1141931
Newman, S.: Building Microservices, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2015)
Newton, D.: Multi-objective qualitative optimization (MOQO) in architectural design. In: Kepczynska-Walczak, A., Bialkowski, S. (eds.), Computing for a Better Tomorrow - Proceedings of the 36th eCAADe Conference, vol. 1, pp. 187–196, Lodz, Poland (2018)
Parish, Y.I.H., Müller, P.: Procedural modeling of cities. In: 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 301–308, August 2001. https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383292
Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A.: The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Roudsari, M.S., Pak, M., Smith, A.: Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, pp. 3129–3135 (2013). http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs2013/p_2499.pdf
Roudsari, M., Yi, Y., Drew, C.: Applying climate-based daylight modelling (CBDM) for a macro scale master plan design case study: the Great City in China. In: ASim. Shanghai, China (2012). https://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/asim2012/0097.pdf
Rutten, D.: Galapagos: on the logic and limitations of generic solvers. Archit. Des. 83(2), 132–135 (2013)
Sileryte, R., D’Aquilio, A., Di Stefano, D., Yang, D., Turrin, M.: Supporting exploration of design alternatives using multivariate analysis algorithms. In: Ramtin, A., Chronis, A., Hanna, S., Turrin, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, pp. 215–222, London, UK (2016)
Talbi, E.G., Mostaghim, S., Okabe, T., Ishibuchi, H., Rudolph, G., Coello Coello, C.A.: Parallel approaches for multiobjective optimization. In: Multiobjective Optimization. LNCS, vol. 5252, pp. 349–372 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3-13
Thinkbox. Deadline. Accessed 14 Apr 14 2019. https://deadline.thinkboxsoftware.com
Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Zydallis, J.B., Lamont, G.B.: Considerations in engineering parallel multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 144–173 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2003.810751
Vesanto, J., Alhoniemi, E.: Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(3), 586–600 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846731
Vierlinger, R.: A framework for flexible search and optimization in parametric design. In: Rethinking Prototyping - Proceedings of the Design Modelling Symposium, October 2013 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1516.8727
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kosicki, M., Tsiliakos, M., Tsigkari, M. (2020). HYDRA Distributed Multi-Objective Optimization for Designers. In: Gengnagel, C., Baverel, O., Burry, J., Ramsgaard Thomsen, M., Weinzierl, S. (eds) Impact: Design With All Senses. DMSB 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29828-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29829-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)