Skip to main content

Rock Mass Classification of Chalk Marl in the UK Channel Tunnels Using Q

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering
  • 1422 Accesses

Abstract

The Q-system for rockmass, core and tunnel logging was used extensively in the TransManche Link TBM tunnelling, and also in a consortium claim against owner Eurotunnel in the early 1990s. In this connection, the Q-system was also used by the first author for logging precedent conditions in local tunnels in chalk marl, and by the construction consortium on a continuous basis in the TBM service and running tunnels. Although chalk marl is nearly at the weakest end of the strength spectrum for rock (mean UCS ≈ 6 MPa), its distinctly bedded and jointed nature makes it quite amenable to classification by rock mass quality descriptors, such as the Q-system. The steeply dipping jointing and sub-horizontal bedding was Q-logged and photographed in the partly flooded Beaumont (Abbots Cliff) TBM tunnel, and in the Terlingham water tunnel, prior to Q-analysis of core logs and core box photographs from the PB series of eight marine core drillings. Mean Q-values were 3.4, 10.6 and 12.6 respectively. The Grey Chalk seen in the cliff exposures at Shakespeare indicated Q-values in the range 4–33. Jointing appears to have been similar in the significantly weaker underlying chalk marl, where permeabilities of about 1–20 Lugeons in an otherwise very impermeable matrix also indicated the presence of extensive jointing. The jointed and bedded nature of chalk marl, as experienced in the Beaumont, Terlingham and Channel Tunnels, resulted in a lot of distinctly discontinuous as opposed to continuum behaviour. Overbreak was marked where joint sets, bedding joints and an unfavourable tunnel direction combined to give the necessary degrees of freedom for block release. The inevitability of block release problems was increased by the relatively smooth and planar character of the joints and by the destabilising effect of high pore pressures in the case of the sub-sea sections of the Channel Tunnel having low rock cover and higher connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton N (1993) Physical and discrete element models of excavation and failure in jointed rock. Keynote lecture. ISRM Int. Symp. on Assessment and Prevention of Failure Phenomena in Rock Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1995) The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. Keynote lecture. 8th ISRM Congress, Tokyo, vol 3. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1023–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2006) Rock quality, seismic velocity, attenuation and anisotropy. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, p 729

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2007) Future directions for rock mass classification and characterization – towards a cross-disciplinary approach. Invited lecture. Proc. of 1st US-Canada Rock Mech. Symp., Vancouver, pp 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. In: Rock mechanics, vol 1/2. Springer, Vienna, pp 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Grimstad E (1994) Rock mass conditions dictate choice between NMT and NATM. Tunnels & Tunnelling, October 1994, pp 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Shen B (2017) Extension failure mechanisms explain failure initiation in deep tunnels and critical heights of cliff faces and near-vertical mountain walls. US Rock Mech. Symp. San Fransisco, ARMA17-686, 20p

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Grimstad E, Aas G, Opsahl ОA, Bakken A, Pedersen L, Johansen ED (1992a) Norwegian method of tunnelling. WT focus on Norway. World tunnelling. June/August 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Loset F, Smallwood A, Vik G, Rawlings C, Chryssanthakis P, Hansteen H, Ireland T (1992b) Geotechnical core characterization for the UK radioactive waste repository design. Proc. of ISRM Symp. EUROCK, Chester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch GP, Rankin WJ (1992) Geotechnical aspects of the UK undersee Crossover. Ch. 22. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. The Channel Tunnel

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall P (1980) A generalized distinct element program for modelling jointed rock. Report PCAR-1-80. Contract DAJA37-79-C-0548, European Research Office, US Army. Peter Cundall Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Eves RCW, Curtis DJ (1992) Tunnel lining design and procurement. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. The Channel Tunnel. Part 1: Tunnels, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugeman ICD, Hawley J, Meyers AG (1992) Major underground structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. The Channel Tunnel, Part 1: Tunnels, pp 87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimstad E, Barton N (1993) Updating of the Q-system for NMT. In: Kompen R, Opsahl OA, Berg K (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete – Modern Use of Wet Mix Sprayed Concrete for Underground Support, Fagernes. Norwegian Concrete Association, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Makurat A, Barton N, Vik G, Chryssanthakis P, Monsen K (1990) Jointed rock mass modelling. International Symposium on Rock Joints. Loen 1990. Proceedings, pp 647–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp JC, Warren CD, Barton NR, Mairwood R (1996) In: Harris CS, Hart MB, Varley PM, Warren CD (eds) Fundamental evaluations of the chalk marl for the prediction of UK marine tunnel stability and water inflows. Ch. 32 in Engineering Geology of the Channel Tunnel, pp 472–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley PM, Warren CD (1995) The channel tunnel project. Keynote lecture. GDF bulletin 11. Proc. XIth European Conf. of Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley PM, Darby A, Radcliffe E (1992) Geology, alignment and survey. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. The Channel Tunnel. Part 1: Tunnels, pp 43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren CD, Varley PM, Parkin R (1992) UK tunnels: geotechnical monitoring and encountered conditions. Ch. 14. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. The Channel Tunnel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this chapter was performed for Geo-Engineering who were under contract for Eurotunnel. The permission of Eurotunnel and of Dr John Sharp of Geo-Engineering to publish this comprehensive analysis is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barton, N., Warren, C. (2020). Rock Mass Classification of Chalk Marl in the UK Channel Tunnels Using Q. In: Kanji, M., He, M., Ribeiro e Sousa, L. (eds) Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29477-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics