Skip to main content

Critical Assessment of Observational Studies and Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Psychiatry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1127 Accesses

Abstract

While mental health problems are common in pregnancy and the postpartum period, there remain a number of barriers to adequate evidence-based care. One important obstacle is the relative lack of evidence regarding the benefits and harms of treatment for perinatal mental disorders. Despite their limitations, observational studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses of these continue to serve as the main source of evidence guiding treatment decisions. The importance of shared decision making in a field where risks exist in both the acceptance and refusal of treatment cannot be overstated. Therefore, it is critical that health-care providers not only know how to critically assess existing evidence, but base decisions on these assessments, women’s values and beliefs, and their clinical presentations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL, Rochat T, Stein A, Milgrom J. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1775–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonari L, Pinto N, Ahn E, Einarson A, Steiner M, Koren G. Perinatal risks of untreated depression during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(11):726–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson GE. Controversies about the use of antidepressants in pregnancy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015;203(3):159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lorh KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5):1071–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis C-L, Falah-Hassani K, Brown HK, Vigod SN. Identifying women at risk for postpartum anxiety: a prospective population-based study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016;134(6):485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vesga-Lopez O, Blanco C, Keyes K, Olfson M, Grant BF, Hasin DS. Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(7):805–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyatt GH, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. In: Guyatt GH, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ, editors. Users’ guides to the medical literature. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. p. 697.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Annals of internal medicine academia and clinic strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration of. Ann Int Med. 2007;147(8):163–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mulimani PS. Evidence-based practice and the evidence pyramid: a 21st century orthodontic odyssey. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;152(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tezlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavis JN, Tugwell P. David Sackett’s unintended impacts on health policy. Milbank Q. 2015;93(4):867–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95(2 SUPPL):2S–4S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalfoglou AL. Ethical and clinical dilemmas in using psychotropic medications during pregnancy. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(6):614–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. von Elm E, Altman DGD, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement : guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2008;12(12):1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Avorn J, Cohen LS, Holmes LB, Franklin JM, et al. Antidepressant use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac defects. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(25):2397–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Einarson A, Choi J, Einarson TR, Koren G. Incidence of major malformations in infants following antidepressant exposure in pregnancy: results of a large prospective cohort study. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(4):242–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigoriadis S, VonderPorten EH, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Dennis C-L, Koren G, et al. Prenatal exposure to antidepressants and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348(jan14 7):f6932.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wegener DT, Blankenship KL. Ecological validity. In: Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slade M. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(2):146–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Coulter A, Collins PA. Making shared decision making a reality. No decision about me, without me. London: Kings Fund; 2011. p. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vigod S, Hussain-shamsy N, Grigoriadis S, Howard LM, Metcalfe K, Oberlander TF, et al. A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy : study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review) decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulder E, Davis A, Gawley L, Bowen A, Einarson A. Motherisk rounds. Negative impact of non-evidence-based information received by women taking antidepressants during pregnancy from health care providers and others. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2012;34(1):66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walton GD, Ross LE, Stewart DE, Grigoriadis S, Dennis CL, Vigod S. Decisional conflict among women considering antidepressant medication use in pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(6):493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonari L, Koren G, Einarson TR, Jasper JD, Taddio A, Einarson A. Use of antidepressants by pregnant women: evaluation of perception of risk, efficacy of evidence based counseling and determinants of decision making. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(4):214–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bennett IM, Marcus SC, Palmer SC, Coyne JC. Pregnancy-related discontinuation of antidepressants and depression care visits among medicaid recipients. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(4):386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Petersen I, Gilbert RE, Evans SJW, Man SL, Nazareth I. Pregnancy as a major determinant for discontinuation of antidepressants: an analysis of data from The Health Improvement Network. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(7):979–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen LS. Relapse of major depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or discontinue antidepressant treatment. JAMA. 2006;295(5):499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Viguera AC, Whitfield T, Baldessarini RJ, Newport DJ, Stowe Z, Reminick A, et al. Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(12):1817–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Connor AMO, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(5):570–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldberg H. Informed decision making in maternity care. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(1):32–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. The Health Care Consent Act. S.O. 1996, c. 2, Sched. A [cited 2019-09-16]. Canada. Available from: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/96h02.

  36. American Hospital Association. A patient’s bill of rights: The American Hospital Association. Hospitals (Lond). 1978;52(22):112.

    Google Scholar 

  37. O’Connor a M, Drake ER, Fiset V, Graham ID, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The Ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2(4):163–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Turner KM, Sharp D, Folkes L, Chew-Graham C. Women’s views and experiences of antidepressants as a treatment for postnatal depression: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2008;25(6):450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. MacQueen GM, Frey BN, Ismail Z, Jaworska N, Steiner M, Lieshout RJV, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: Section 6. Special populations: youth, women, and the elderly. Can J Psychiatr. 2016;61(9):588–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Grigoriadis S, VonderPorten EH, Mamisashvili L, Roerecke M, Rehm J, Dennis CL, et al. Antidepressant exposure during pregnancy and congenital malformations: is there an association? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the best evidence. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(4):e293–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kjaersgaard MIS, Parner ET, Vestergaard M, Sørensen MJ, Olsen J, Christensen J, et al. Prenatal antidepressant exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion – a population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Grigoriadis S, VonderPorten EH, Mamisashvili L, Eady A, Tomlinson G, Dennis CL, et al. The effect of prenatal antidepressant exposure on neonatal adaptation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(4):e309–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rotem-Kohavi N, Oberlander TF. Variations in neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with prenatal SSRI antidepressant exposure. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(12):909–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hale TW, Rowe H. Medications & mothers’ milk. 17th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 1095.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Molyneaux E, Howard LM, McGeown HR, Karia AM, Trevillion K. Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):1–59. CD002018

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moehler E, Brunner R, Wiebel A, Reck C, Resch F. Maternal depressive symptoms in the postnatal period are associated with long-term impairment of mother-child bonding. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9(5):273–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Hara MW, McCabe JE. Postpartum depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9(1):379–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan J. Van Lieshout .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Forrest, L.F., Van Lieshout, R.J. (2020). Critical Assessment of Observational Studies and Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Psychiatry. In: Rennó Jr., J., Valadares, G., Cantilino, A., Mendes-Ribeiro, J., Rocha, R., Geraldo da Silva, A. (eds) Women's Mental Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29081-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29081-8_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29080-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29081-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics