Skip to main content

Ovals with 4n Centres: The Ground Plan of the Colosseum and the Neuilly Bridge Arches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
All Sides to an Oval

Abstract

Ovals with more than four centres have been widely used, for example to align important points in a building and/or to improve a four-centre oval in its resemblance to an ellipse. These can be so close to each other that many researchers argue whether famous buildings were in fact designed (and/or built) as eight (or more) -centre ovals or as ellipses. Within the common work on the Colosseum [1], Trevisan (see [18]) compares the ground plan of various Roman amphitheatres and discusses the four- and eight-centre options (we will discuss this in detail in Sect. 8.2), while Benedetti (see [2]) suggests an eight-centre oval construction for Antonio da Sangallo’s Vatican dome, as also reported by Migliari in [12], where in general the oval vs ellipse dispute is discussed. Due to technical, practical and aesthetical advantages, arches and bridges have often been built using half-ovals with 5, 7, 9 or more centres (the formula for a half-oval is 2n + 1 centres): we will deal with an example of this in Sect. 8.3—the bridge at Neuilly by Perronet—with the help of Zerlenga’s book [20]. More about lowered arches can then be found in Breymann’s work [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Figure 2.2 in Chap. 2 illustrates this.

  2. 2.

    Note that parameters a and b are inverted in Perronet’s work [14]. We decided though to be consistent with the lettering of the present book.

  3. 3.

    The authors of [10] report that Perronet actually decided to calculate m, n and s on a model exactly three times smaller than the arch he needed to build, and Zerlenga reports in [20] that Perronet uses trigonometry and the table of sines to calculate s.

References

  1. AA.VV: Il Colosseo. Studi e ricerche (Disegnare idee immagini X(18-19)), Roma. Gangemi (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benedetti, S.: Oltre l’antico e il gotico. Il profilo della cupola vaticana di Antonio da Sangallo il Giovane. Palladio. 14, 57–166 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breymann, G.A.: Trattato di costruzioni civili con cenni speciali intorno alle costruzioni grandiose. Vallardi, Milano (1926–1931)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casale, A.: Alcune ipotesi sul progetto e sulle geometrie del Colosseo. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 81–87 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Croci, G.: Il comportamento strutturale del Colosseo. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 15–22 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Docci, M.: La forma del Colosseo: dieci anni di ricerche. Il dialogo con i gromatici romani. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 23–32 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dotto, E.: Il Disegno Degli Ovali Armonici. Le Nove Muse, Catania (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginoux, J.-M., Golvin, J.-C.: Sur la détermination du périmètre de l’ovale à huit centres. Comptes Rendus Mat. 356, 1195–1202 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Golvin, J.-C.: L’Amphithéâtre romain: essai sur la théorisation de sa forme et de ses fonctions. Boccard, Paris (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez-Collado, M.D.C., Calvo Roselló, V., Capilla Tamborero, E.: Mathematical modeling of oval arches. A study of the George V and Neuilly Bridges. J Cult. Herit. 32, 144–155 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzotti, A.A.: A Euclidean approach to eggs and polycentric curves. Nexus Netw. J. 16(2), 345–387 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Migliari, R.: Ellissi e ovali. Epilogo di un conflitto. Palladio. 16(8), 93–102 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Migliari, R.: Principi teorici e prime acquisizioni nel rilievo del Colosseo. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 33–50 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Perronet, J.R.: Descriptions des Projets et de la Constructions des Pont de Neuilli, de Mantes, d’Orléans, etc. Paris (1788)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ragazzo, F.: Curve Policentriche. Sistemi di raccordo tra archi e rette. Prospettive, Roma (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosin, P.L., Pitteway, M.L.V.: The ellipse and the five-centred arch. Math. Gaz. 85(502), 13–24 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sciacchitano, E.: Il Colosseo. Geometria dell’impianto. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 107–116 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trevisan, C.: Sullo schema geometrico costruttivo degli anfiteatri romani: gli esempi del Colosseo e dell’arena di Verona. Disegnare Idee Immagini. 18–19, 117–132 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson Jones, M.: Designing Amphitheatres. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung. 100, 391–442 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zerlenga, O.: La “forma ovata” in architettura, Rappresentazione geometrica. Cuen, Napoli (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mazzotti, A.A. (2019). Ovals with 4n Centres: The Ground Plan of the Colosseum and the Neuilly Bridge Arches. In: All Sides to an Oval. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28810-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics