Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and the Genepool

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beta maritima

Abstract

The presence of conspecific and interfertile wild and cultivated forms impeded the development of a stable taxonomic system of wild beet species (genus Beta and Patellifolia) in the past. Further difficulties have been caused by the proliferation of synonyms and the confusion this has caused in the nomenclature, which was only slightly reduced after Linnaeus. The frequent errors in classification solely based on plant morphology are being reduced by studying the structures of genetic diversity with molecular genetic markers. Genetic markers as well as results from interspecific crossing experiments have helped revealing the past and ongoing evolutionary processes, as well as phylogenic relationships between taxa. Despite some unresolved taxonomic questions, wild beet plants can be determined and classified with sufficient reliability today which allowed categorizing the wild taxa into the primary, secondary, and tertiary genepool of the crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe J, Shimamoto Y (1989) Evolutionary aspects and species relationships. In: IBPGR. International crop network series. 3. Report of an international workshop on Beta genetic resources. International board for plant genetic resources, Rome, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Abe J, Tsuda C (1986) Genetic behaviour of wild chromosomes in the species hybrids made between sugar beet and B. macrocarpa. Proc Sugar Beet Res Asso Jpn 28:25–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abe J, Tsuda C (1987) Genetic analysis for isozyme variation in the section Vulgares, genus Beta. Jpn J Breed 37:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abe J, Yoshikawa H, Chikahiro T (1984) Isozyme variation used in selecting cultivated type plants out of the segregated population of the interspecific hybrids between sugar beet and the wild relative, B. macrocarpa. Proc Sugar Beet Res Asso Jpn 26:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Aellen P (1938) Die orientalische Beta Arten. Ber Schweiz Bot Ges 48:408–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Aellen P (1967) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Univ Press, Edinbourgh, UK, pp 296–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Maldon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrello M, Henry K, Devaux P, Verdelet D, Desprez B, Manel S (2017) Insights into the genetic relationships among plants of Beta section Beta using SNP markers. Theor Appl Genet 130:1857–1866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arapova TS (1987) Hybrids between cultivated beet and the wild apomictic species Beta corolliflora Zoss. and B. trigyna W. et Kit. In: Problemy apomiksisa i otdalennoi gibridizatsii. Nauka (Publisher), pp 146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcangeli G (1882) Compendio della flora italiana. Ermanno Loescher, Torino, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson P, Graebner P (1919) Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldacci A, de Toni E, Frati L, Ghigi A, Gortani M, Morini F, Ridolfi AC, Sorbelli A (1907) Intorno alla vita ed alle opere di Ulisse Aldrovandi. Libreria Treves di L. Beltrami, Bologna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Barocka KH (1959) Die einzelfrüchtigen Arten der Gattung Beta L. in Hinblick auf ihre mögliche Verwendung zur Einkreuzung in B. vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (Zucker- und Futterrübe). Züchter 29:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barocka KH (1985) Zucker und Fütterrüben (Beta vulgaris L.). In: Hoffmann W, Mudra A, Plarre W (eds) Lehrbuch der Züchtung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanze, vol 2. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, pp 245–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin G (1622) Catalogus plantarum circa Basileam sponte nascentium … etc. Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin G (1623) Pinax theatri botanici … etc. Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti-Pichat C (1866) Corso teorico e pratico di agricoltura. Unione Tipografico-Editrice, Torino, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni A (1837) Flora italica, vol 3. Typographeo Richardi Morii, Bologna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilz M, Kell S, Maxted N, Lansdown RV (2011) European red list of vascular plants. Pub. Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier E (1879) Flora orientalis sive enumeratio plantarum in Oriente a Graecia et Aegipto ad Indiae fines hucusque observatarum. Apud H Georg Bibliopolam, Lugduni (Lyon), France

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughey CL (1981) Evolutionary and taxonomic studies in wild and cultivated beets. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell D, Bramwell Z (1974) Wild flowers of the Canary Islands. Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd., Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Burenin VI, Garvrilynk IP (1982) Systematics and phylogeny of the genus Beta L. Trudy po Prikladnoi Botanike, Genetike i Selektsii 72:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttler KP (1977) Revision von Beta Sektion Corollinae (Chenopodiaceae) I. Selbststerile Basisarten. Mitt Bot München 255–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GKG (1984) Sugar beet. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longmann, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro S, Loureiro J, Iriondo J, Rubio Teso ML, Duarte MC, Romeiras MM, Pinheiro de Carvalho MAA, Santos Guerra A, Rey E, Frese L (2017) Cytogenetic diversity of Patellifolia species. In: Poster presented at 6th Global Botanic Gardens Congress, Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Conservatory and Botanical Garden of the City of Geneva, Switzerland, 26–30 June 2017. http://www.6gbgc.org/en/sample-page/

  • Castro M, Castro S, Figueiredo A, Husband B, Loureiro J (2018) Complex cytogeographical patterns reveal a dynamic tetraploid–octoploid contact zone. AoB PLANTS 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/ply012

  • Cesalpino A (1583) De plantis libri XVI. Apud Georgium Marescottum, Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleij G, de Bock TSM, Lekkerkerker B (1968) Crosses between Beta intermedia Bunge and Beta vulgaris L. Euphytica 17:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleij G, de Bock TSM, Lekkerkerker B (1976) Crosses between Beta vulgaris L. and Beta lomatogona F. et M. Euphytica 25:539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles W (1657) Adam in Eden or natures paradise. Printed by F Streater, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1954) The wild species of Beta. Proc Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 8:142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordus V (1551) Adinotationes in Dioscoridis de medica material libros. Apud Buil. Morelium, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1988) The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd., London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupani F (1696) Hortus catholicus etc. Apud Franciscum Benzi, Naples, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale S (1730) The history and antiquities of Harwich and Dovercourt. Printed for C Davis and T Green, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalke L (1977) Interspecific hybrids between sugar beet and Beta corolliflora of the Corollinae section. In: Interspecific hybridization in plant breeding. Proceedings of the 8th Eucarpia Congress, Madrid, Spain, pp 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis P (1937) Flora of Turkey. Edinburgh Univ Press, Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bock TSM (1986) The genus Beta: domestication, taxonomy and interspecific hybridization for plant breeding. Acta Hort 182:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A (1849) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetali. Librarierie de Victor Masson, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechyeva D, Schmidt T (2009) Molecular cytogenetic mapping of chromosomal fragments and immunostaining of kinetochore proteins in Beta. Int J Plant Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/721091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Commerell A (1778) Of the culture and use of Mangel Wurzel, or root of scarcity. Printed for Charles Dilly, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lobel M (1576) Plantarum seu stirpium historia … etc. Anterwep, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Desel C, Jansen R, Dedong G, Schmidt T (2002) Painting of parental chromatin in Beta hybrids by multi-colour fluorescent in situ hybridization. Ann Bot 89:171–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Desfontaines R (1789) Flora atlantica. Blanchon, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vilmorin MJL (1923) L’hérédité chez la betterave cultivée. Thèse de Doctorat, Gauthier-Villars et Cie, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries U (1905) Species and varieties. Open Court Publishing Co, Chicago IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tournefort JP (1700) Institutiones rei herbariae. Thypographia Regia, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wildeman E, Durand T (1899) Prodrome de Flore Belge. Alfred Castaigne Editeur, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohm JC, Minoche AE, Holtgräwe D, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Zakrzewski F, Tafer H, Rupp O, Sörensen TR, Stracke R, Reinhardt R, Goesmann A, Kraft T, Schulz B, Stadler PF, Schmidt T, Gabaldón T, Lehrach H, Weisshaar B, Himmelbauer H (2013) The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 505:546–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernauld L (1945) Les espèces botanique du genre Beta. Publ IRBAB 13:219–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Filutowicz A, Dalke L (1976) Interspecific hybrids in the Corollinae section, genus Beta. Hodowla Roślin, Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 20(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer HE (1989) Origin of the ‘Weisse Schlesische Rübe’ (white Silesian beet) and resynthesis of sugar beet. Euphytica 41:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV (2005) Taxonomy. In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, de Biaggi M (eds) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers, Enfield NH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (1986) Weed beets, their origin and classification. Acta Hort 82:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams ALS, Williams JT (1975) A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae), with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot J Linn Soc 71:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese L (2003) Sugar beets and related wild species—from collecting to utilisation. In: Knüpffer H, Ochsmann J (eds) Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen, vol 22. Zentralstelle für Agrardokumentation und-information (ZADI), Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese L (2010) Conservation and access to sugar beet germplasm. Sugar Tech 12:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese L, Nachtigall M, Enders M, Pinheiro de Carvalho MÂA (2012) Beta patula Aiton: genetic diversity analysis. In: Maxted N, Dulloo ME, Ford-Lloyd BV, Frese L, Iriondo JM, Pinheiro de Carvalho MÂA (eds) Agrobiodiversity conservation: securing the diversity of crop wild relatives and landraces. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese L, Nachtigall N, Iriondo JM, Rubio Teso ML, Duarte MC, Pinheiro de Carvalho MÂA (2018) Genetic diversity and differentiation in Patellifolia (Amaranthaceae) in the Macaronesian archipelagos and the Iberian Peninsula and implications for genetic conservation programmes. Genet Resour Crop Evol

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche K, Metzlaff M, Melzer R, Hagemann R (1987) Comparative restriction endonuclease analysis and molecular cloning of plastid DNAs from wild species and cultivated varieties of the genus Beta (L.). Theor Appl Genet 74:589–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gandoger M (1910) Novus conspectus florae Europeae. Hermann et fils, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao D, Schmidt T, Jung C (2000) Molecular characterization and chromosomal distribution of species-specific repetitive DNA sequences from Beta corolliflora, a wild relative of sugar beet. Genome 43:1073–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germeier CU, Frese L (2004) The international database for Beta. In: Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E, Maggioni L (eds) Report of a working group on Beta and world Beta network. Second joint meeting, 23–26 October 2002, Bologna, Italy. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp 84–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesner K (1561) Simesusij Annotationes in Pedacij Dioscoridis. Anazarbei De medica materia Libros V: etc. Argentorati Excudibat Iosias Rihelius

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene EL (1909) Linnaeus as an evolutionist. Proc Washington Acad Sci 9:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürke M (1897) Plantae europeae. Paris, France & Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam A (1972) Continental drift and the fossil record. Sci Am 227:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanelt P, Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (eds) (2001) Mansfeld’s encyclopedia of agricultural and horticultural crops (except Ornamentals). Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan J, de Wet J (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heldreich J (1877) Pflanzen der Attische Ebene. Engelmann, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm J (1957) Versuche einer morphologisch-systematischer Gliederung der Art Beta vulgaris L. Züchter 27:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenacker M (1838) Pflanzen der Provinz Talish. Soc. Imp. Naturalists, Moskow, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann S, Kadereit JW, Kadereit G (2006) Understanding Mediterranean-Californian disjunctions: molecular evidence from Chenopodiaceae-Betoideae. Taxon 55:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson BD (1881) Guide to the literature of botany; Being classified selection of botanical works. Longmans & Green, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem B (1992) Species relationship in the genus Beta as revealed by crossing experiments. In: Frese L (ed) International Beta genetic resources network. A report on the 2nd international Beta genetic resources workshop held at the Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Braunschweig, Germany, 24–28 June 1991. IBPGR, Rome, Italy, pp 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem B, Jazdzewska E (1980) Cytoembryological investigation of triploid F2 hybrids of Beta macrorhiza Stev. X Beta lomatogona f. 2x F. et M. (Badania cytoembriologiczne nad triploidalnymi mieszancami pokolenia F2 Beta macrorhiza Stev. X Beta lomatogona f. 2x F. et M.). Hodowla Roslin, Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 2:707–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem B, Jazdzewska E, Szota M (1985) Badania nad Filogeneza Dzikich Gatunkow Sekcji Corollinae Rodzaju Beta (Investigations on phylogenesis of wild species of the Beta genus within the Corollinae section). Hodowla Roslin, Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 29:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jung C, Pillen K, Frese L, Fähr S, Melchinger AE (1993) Phylogenetic relationships between cultivated and wild species of the genus Beta revealed by DNA “fingerprinting”. Theor Appl Genet 86:449–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadereit G, Hohmann S, Kadereit JW (2006) A synopsis of Chenopodiaceae subfam. Betoideae and notes on the taxonomy of Beta. Willdenowia 36:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K (1839) Das natürliche System des Pflanzenreichs. Hofhausen, Ben Karl, Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch J (1858) Synopsis florae Germanicae et Helveticae, 3rd edn. Sumptibus Gerhard et Reisland, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarnitsky IK, Samoylov AM, Red’ko VV, Peretyayko VG, Gleba YuYu (1990) Intraspecific diversity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) mitochondrial DNA. Theor Appl Genet 80:253–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krasochkin VT (1959) Review of the species of the genus Beta. Trudy Po Prikladnoi Botanike. Genetik i Selektsii 32:3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubis S, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schmidt T (1997) A family of differentially amplified repetitive DNA sequences in ther genus Beta reveals genetic variation in Beta vulgaris subspecies and cultivars. J Mol Evol 44:310–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntze O (1891) Revisio plantarum. Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange W, de Bock TSM (1989) The Diploidised Meiosis of Tetraploid Beta macrocarpa and its Possible Application in Breeding Sugar Beet. Plant Breed 103:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange W, Brandenburg WA, de Bock TSM (1999) Taxonomy and cultonomy of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot J Linn Soc 130:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledebour CF (1846) Flora rossica, sive enummeratio plantarum etc. Sumptibus Librariae E Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz HO (1869) Botanik der alten Griechen und Römer. Verlag von Thienemann, Gotha, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 93-1, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW, Lange W, Frese L, van Der Berg RG (1994) Taxonomy of Beta selection Beta. J Sugar Beet Res 31:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys M, Petit EJ, El-Bahloul Y, Liso C, Fournet S, Arnaud JF (2014) Spatial genetic structure in Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima and Beta macrocarpa reveals the effect of contrasting mating system, influence of marine currents, and footprints of postglacial recolonization routes. Ecol Evol 4(10):1828–1852. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1061

  • Linnaeus (1735) Systema Naturae. Typie et Sumptibus Io Iac Curt, Halae Magdeburgicae (Halle), Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus (1753) Species plantarium exhibentes plantas rite cognitas … etc., 1st edn. Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Löptien H (1984) Breeding nematode-resistant beets. 1. Development of resistant alien additions by crosses between Beta vulgaris L. and wild-species of the section Patellares. Z Pflanzenzüchtg 92:208–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfeld R (1959) Vorläufiges Verzeichnis landwirtschaftlich oder gartnerish Pflanzenarten. Kulturpflanze 2:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschall P (1819) Flora taurico-caucasica, vol 1. Charkov, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah M, de Bock TSM, Sandbrink JM, Klein-Lankhorst RM, Lange W (1997a) Molecular and morphological characterisation of monosomic additions in Beta vulgaris, carrying extra chromosomes of B. procumbens or B. patellaris. Mol Breed 3:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesbah M, Scholten OE, de Bock TSM, Lange W (1997b) Chromosome localisation of genes for resistance to Heterodera schachtii, Cercospora beticola and Polymyxa betae using sets of Beta procumbens and B. patellaris derived monosomic additions in B. vulgaris. Euphytica 97(1):117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Mglinets AV (2008) Phylogenetic relationships of genus Beta species based on the chloroplast trnK (matK) gene intron sequence information. Dokl Biochem Biophys 420:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mita G, Dani M, Casciari P, Pasquali A, Selva E, Minganti C, Piccardi P (1991) Assessment of the degree of genetic variation in beet based on RFLP analysis and the taxonomy of Beta. Euphytica 55:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moquin-Tandon A (1840) Chenopodearum monographica enumeratio. J-P Loss, Paris, France

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morison R (1715) Plantarum historiae universalis oxoniensis. Apud PI Vaillant, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutel A (1836) Flore française destinée aux herborizations ou descriptions des plantes. Levrault, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldemeyer RK (1957) Sugar beet male sterility. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Tech 9:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paesold S, Borchardt D, Schmidt T, Dechyeva D (2012) A sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) reference FISH karyotype for chromosome and chromosome-arm identification, integration of genetic linakge groups and analysis of major repeat family distribution. Plant J. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-313x.2012.05102.x

  • Parkinson J (1655) Matthiae de L’Obel stirpium illustrationes. Warren, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Phitos D, Strid A, Snogerup S, Greuter W (eds) (1995) The Red Data Book of rare and threatened plants of Greece. WWF-Greece, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Radde A (1866) Reisen an der Persisch-russischen Grenze. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Büttner SM, Wricke G (1993) Evidence of tetrasomic inheritance in Beta corolliflora. J Sugar Bett Res 30:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1690) Synopsis methodica stirpium Britannicarum … etc. Apud Samuel Smith, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1693) Historia plantarum generalis. Smith & Walford, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach L, Reichenbach HG (1909) Icones florae Germanicae et Helveticae. Sumptibus Federici de Zezschwitz, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeiras MM, Vieira A, Silva DN, Moura M, Santos-Guerra A, Batista D, Duarte MC, Paulo OS (2016) Evolutionary and biogeographic insights on the Macaronesian Beta-Patellifolia species (Amaranthaceae) from a time-scaled molecular phylogeny. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0152456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh W (1832) Flora indica or description of Indian plants. Printed for W Thacker andCo, Calcutta, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni S, Bervillè A (1992) Two different satellite DNAs in Beta vulgaris L.: evolution, quantification and distribution in the genus. Theor Appl Genet 84:1009–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky H (1978) Nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance and meiosis in diploid plants from interspecific Beta vulgaris x B. procumbens hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol 20:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott AJ, Ford Lloyd BV, Williams JT (1977) Patellifolia, nomen novum (Chenopodiaceae). Taxon 26:284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Newbury HJ, Ford-Lloyd BV (1996) The taxonomic characterisation of annual Beta germplasm in a genetic resources collection using RAPD markers. Euphytica 91:205–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Newbury HJ, Ford-Lloyd BV (1998) Identification of Taxa in the genus Beta using ITS1 Sequence Information. Plant Mol Bio Rep 16:147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speckmann GJ, de Bock TSM (1982) The production of alien monosomic additions in Beta vulgaris as a source for the introgression of resistance to beet root nematode (Heterodera schachtii) from Beta species of the section Patellares. Euphytica 31:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steudel E (1871) Nomenclator Botanicus … etc. Sumptibus LG Cottae, Stuttgart and Tübingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes J (1812) A botanical materia medica etc. J Johnson & Co., London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Szota M (1995) Meiosis in species of sections Procumbentes and Corollinae and in interspecific hybrids within these sections and with sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) (Mejoza gatunkow sekcji Procumbentes i Corollinae oraz miedzygatunkowych mieszancow w obrebie tych sekcji i z burakiem cukrowym (Beta vulgaris L.) Hodowla Roslin, Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 39(4):3–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Szota M, Kuzdowicz A (1978) Meiosis in Beta macrorhiza 2x X B. trigyna 6x and B. lomatogona 2x X B. trigyna 6x F1 and F2 hybrids (Mejoza mieszancow F1 i F2 Beta macrorhiza 2x X Beta trigyna 6x oraz F1 i F2 Beta lomatogona 2x X Beta trigyna 6x). Hodowla Roslin, Aklimatyzacja i Nasiennictwo 22:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulin M, Rydberg A, Thiede J (2010) Identity of Tetragonia pentandra and taxonomy and distribution of Patellifolia (Chenopodiaceae) Willdenowia 40:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilli MA (1723) Catalogus plantarum horti pisani. Tartino & Franchi, Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzet P, Villain S, Buret L, Martin H, Holl A-C, Poux C, Cuguen J (2018) Chloroplastic and nuclear diversity of wild beets at a large geographical scale: Insights into the evolutionary history of the Beta section. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3774

  • Tranzshel VA (1927) Obzor vida roda Beta. Trudy prikl. Bot Genet Selek 17:203–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Trehane P, Brickell CD, Baum BR, Hetterscheid WLA, Leslie AC, McNeil J, Spongberg SA, Vrugtman F (1995) International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants—1995 (ICNCP or Cultivated plant code). Quarterjack Publishing, Wimbourne, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgess NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964) Flora Europaea. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich E (1934) Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H (eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 375–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentini CB (1715) Tournefortius contractus sub forma tabularum. Frankfurt, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • van Geyt JPC, Lange W, Oléo M, de Bock TSM (1990) Natural variation within the genus Beta and its possible use for breeding sugar beet: a review. Euphytica 49:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilchenko EN, Zhuzhzhalova TP (2011) Variability of morphological and biochemical traits of beet interspecific hybrids. Sakharnaya Svekla 1:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Villain S (2007) Histoire evolutive de la section Beta. Dissertation, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (1925) Geschichte der Rübe (Beta) als Kulturpflanze. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Proskowetz E (1896) Über die Culturversuche mit Beta im Jahre 1895, und über Beobachtungen an Wildformen auf natürlichen Standorten. Österreiche-Ungarische Zeitschrift für Zuckerindustrie und Landwirtschaft 33:711–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Gimbel E-M, Wricke G (1989) Are Beta procumbens Chr. Sm. and B. webbiana Moq. different species? Plant Breeding 102:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walia K (1971) Meiotic prophase in the genus Beta (B. vulgaris 2x and 4x, – B. webbiana and B. patellaris). Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 65:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Willdenow KL (1707) Species plantarum exibentes plantas rite cognitas … etc. Nauck, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Zossimovitch V (1934) Wild species of beets in Transcaucasia. VNIS2-3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 60 Elm Grove, Bromsgrove, Worcs, B61 0DX, UK

    Lothar Frese & Brian Ford-Lloyd

Authors
  1. Lothar Frese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Ford-Lloyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Ford-Lloyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Formerly Stazione Sperimentale di Bieticoltura, Rovigo, Italy

    Enrico Biancardi

  2. Crop Research Laboratory, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University (Formerly USDA-ARS), Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Leonard W. Panella

  3. USDA-ARS, Sugar Beet and Bean Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    J. Mitchell McGrath

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frese, L., Ford-Lloyd, B. (2020). Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and the Genepool. In: Biancardi, E., Panella, L., McGrath, J. (eds) Beta maritima. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28748-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation