Skip to main content

Physiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beta maritima
  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

Sea beet is an ideal plant species for evolutionary ecology studies. The range of variation is very large among its populations for life cycle and several life-history traits, such as the proportion of dormant seeds, mean life span, age at maturity, flowering time, day length requirement and vernalization requirement for flowering. These traits follow latitudinal patterns in France, of which many correlate with ecological factors. The range of variation of these traits, their geographical patterns, heritability and the ecology have been studied. A large potential for a genetic change in day length sensitivity has been observed experimentally, and a substantial genetic change in the flowering date within two decades has been reported, probably in line with the recent climate change. Sea beet also displays a geographical variation for some reproductive traits, that is, self-incompatibility and male-sterility. Sea beet exhibits two specific characteristics in its mating system when compared with the other species of the section: it is self-incompatible and gynodioecious. Gynodioecy is under cytonuclear control, sterilizing factors being encoded by the mitochondrial genome. Recent advances on the molecular characterization of the different male-sterilizing mitochondrial genomes found in beet are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abegg FA (1936) A genetic factor for the annual habit in beets and linkage relationship. J Agr Res 53:493–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen NS, Siegismund HR, Jørgensen B (2005) Low level of gene flow from cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) into Danish populations of sea beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima (L.) Arcangeli). Mol Ecol 14:1391–1405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angevine MW, Chabot BF (1979) Seed germinaion syndromes in higher plants. In: Solbrig OT, Jain S, Johnson GB, Raven PH (eds) Topics in plant population biology. Columbia University Press, New York, U.S

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud JF, Fénart S, Godé C, Deledicque S, Touzet P, Cuguen J (2009) Fine-scale geographical structure of genetic diversity in inland wild beet populations. Mol Ecol 18:3201–3215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud JF, Viard F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J (2003) Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:1565–1571

    Google Scholar 

  • Artschwager E (1927) Development of flowers and seed in the sugar beet. J Agr Res 34:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Artschwager E, Starrett R (1933) The time factor in fertilization and embryo development in the sugar beet. J Agr Res 47:823–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Clegg J, Ellstrand N (1999) Origin of wild beets and gene flow between Beta vulgaris and B. macrocarpa in California. Proc Br Crop Prot Counc Symp 72:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Cuguen J, Biancardi E, Sweet J (2003) Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet–current status and future research needs. Environ Biosaf Res 2:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley JD, Black M (1994) Seeds: physiology of development and germination Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E (2005) Objectives of sugar beet breeding—morphological and physiological iraits. In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, de Biaggi M (eds) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, NH, USA, pp 72–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss FA, Gabelman WH (1965) Inheritance of male sterility in beets, Beta vulgaris L. Crop Sci 5:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1971) Use of Mendelian male sterility in recurrent selection and hybrid breeding in beets. In: Report of meeting of the Eucarpia fodder crops section at Lusignan, France, pp 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1993) Genetics and breeding. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop: science into practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 66–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1998) Genetic diversity for male sterility in wild and cultivated beets. In: Frese L, Panella L, Srivastava HM, Lange W (eds) International beta genetic resources network. A report on the 4th International. Beta genetic resources workshop and world beta network conference held at the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Izmir, Turkey, 28 Feb–3 Mar 1996. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp 44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudry P, Mccombie H, van Dijk H (2002) Vernalization requirement of wild beet Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima: Among population variation and its adaptive significance. J Ecol 90:693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, van Dijk H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theor Appl Genet 87:471–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boudry P, Wieber R, Saumitou-Laprade P, Pillen K (1994) Identification of RFLP markers closely linked to the bolting gene B and their significance for the study of the annual habit in beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 88:852–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin V, Jean R, Valero M, Vernet P (1988) Gynodioecy in Beta maritima. Oecol Plant 9:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin V, Pannenbecker G, Ecke W, Schewe G, Saumitou-Laprade P, Jean R, Vernet P, Michaelis G (1987) Cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear restorer genes in a natural population of Beta maritima: genetical and molecular aspects. Theor Appl Genet 73:625–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Stadler V (1987) Sélection sexuelle et dynamique de la stérilité male dans les populations naturelle de Beta maritima. Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lillel

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Stadler V, Saumitou-Laprade P, Valero M, Jean R, Vernet P (1989) Spatio-temporal variation of male sterile frequencies in two natural populations of Beta maritima. Heredity 63:395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun L, Haldrup A, Petersen SG, Frese L, de Bock TSM, Lange W (1995) Self-incompatibility reactions in wild species of the genus Beta and their relation to taxonomical classification and geographical origin. Genet Resour Crop Evol 42:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LG, Entz GW (1991) Temperature effects on sugar beet seedling emergence. J Sugar Beet Res 28:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am Nat 112:975–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coç H (2005) Investigation of male sterility in sugar beet populations. Akadeniz Universitesi Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi 18:195–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe GE, Stewart D (1977) Cytoplasmic male sterility, self fertility, and monogermness in Beta maritima L. J ASSBT 19:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1975) Interspecific hybrids between Beta vulgaris L. and the wild species of Beta. J ASSBT 18:281–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane E, Walker P (1984) Beta Vulgaris L. Pollination directory for world crop. IBRA, Hill House, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuguen J, Wattier R, Saumitou-Laprade P, Forciolo D, Mörchen M, van Dijk H (1994) Gynodioecy and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in natural populations of Beta vulgaris ssp maritima. Genet Sel Evol 26(Suppl 1):87s–101s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg HW (1938) Some observations on the wild beet (Beta maritima). Proc Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 1:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale MFB, Ford-Lloyd BV (1983) Reproductive characters associated with breeding behaviour in Beta sect. Beta (Chenopodiaceae). Plant Syst Evol 143:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale MFB, Ford-Lloyd BV, Arnold MH (1985) Variation in some agronomically important characters in a germplasm collection of beet (Beta Vulgaris L.). Euphytica 34:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalke L, Szota M (1993) Utilizing male sterility from Beta maritima in sugarbeet breeding. J Sugar Beet Res 30:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darracq A, Varré JS, Maréchal-Drouard L, Courseaux A, Castric V, Saumitou-Laprade P, Oztas S, Lenoble P, Vacherie B, Barbe V, Touzet P (2011) Structural and content diversity of mitochondrial genome in beet: a comparative genomic analysis. Genome Biol Evol 3:723–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different form of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Cauwer I, Dufaÿ M, Cuguen J, Arnaud J-F (2010) Effects of fine-scale genetic structure on male mating success in gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Mol Ecol 19:1540–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Cauwer I, Arnaud J-F, Courseaux A, Dufaÿ M (2011) Sex-specific fitness variation in gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: do empirical observations fit theoretical predictions? J Evol Biol 24:2456–2472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vilmorin JL (1923) L’ hérédité de la betterave cultivée. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Bailey MF (2010) The nearness of you: the effect of population structure on siring success in a gynodioecious species. Mol Ecol 19:1520–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desplanque B, Viard F, Bernard J, Forcioli D, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, van Dijk H (2000) The linkage disequilibrium between chloroplast DNA and mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (L.): the usefulness of both genomes for population genetic studies. Mol Ecol 9:141–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dornier A, Dufay M (2013) How selfing, inbreeding depression, and pollen limitation impact nuclear-cytoplasmic gynodioecy: a model. Evolution 67:2674–2687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen S (2003) Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima an Deutschlands Ostseeküste. PhD, RWTH Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchenne M, Lejeune B, Fouillard P, Quetler F (1989) Comparison of the organization and expression of mtDNA of fertile and male-sterile sugar beet varities (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 78:633–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducos E, Touzet P, Boutry M (2001a) The male sterile G cytoplasm of wild beet displays modified mitochondrial respiratory complexes. Plant J 26:171–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducos E, Touzet P, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, Cuguen J (2001b) Nuclear effect on mitochondrial protein expression of the CMS Owen cytoplasm in sugar beet. Theor Appl Genet 102:1299–1304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dufaÿ M, Cuguen J, Arnauld JF, Touzet P, Shykoff J (2009) Sex ratio variation among gynodioecious populations of sea beet: can it be explained by negative frequency-dependent selection? Evolution 63:1483–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dufaÿ M, Touzet P, Maurice S, Cuguen J (2007) Modeling the maintenance of male-fertile cytoplasm in a gyodioecious population. Heredity 99:349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esau K (1977) Anatomy of seed plants, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fénart S, Touzet P, Arnaud J-F, Cuguen J (2006) Emergence of gynodioecy in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima L.): a genealogical approach using chloroplastic nucleotide sequences. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1391–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galmés J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2006) Germination capacity and temperature dependance in Mediterranean species of Balearic Islands. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For 15:88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogan D (2009) Survey of Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima populations in Ireland. In: Frese L, Maggioni L, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta and the World Beta Network. Third Joint Meeting, 8–11 March 2006, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy, pp 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldén C, Bryngelsson T, Bosemark NO (1988) Two new types of cytoplasmic male sterility found in wild Beta beets. Theor Appl Genet 75:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, van Dijk H (2001) Investment on survival and reproduction along a semelparity-iteroparity gradient in the Beta species complex. J Evol Biol 14:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, van Dijk H (2002a) Life span in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: the effects of age at first reproduction and disturbance. J Ecol 90:508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, van Dijk H (2002b) Variation in ageing and meristemic activity in relation to flower-bud and fruit excision in the Beta species complex. New Physiol 179:575–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, van Dijk H, Piquot Y, Teriokhin A (2009) Evolutionary optimization of life-history traits in the sea beet Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima: comparing model to data. Acta Oecol 35:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann K, Meinhard J, Dobrev P, Linkies A, Pesek B, Hess B, Machackova I, Fischer U, Leubner-Metzger G (2007) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and abscisic acid during the germination of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): a comparative study of fruits and seeds. J Exp Bot 58:3047–3060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroshi S, Tomohiko K (2003) Genetical and molecular analyses of male sterility found in Beta maritima accession FR4-31. Proc Jpn Soc Sugar Beet Technol 44:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Höft N, Dally N, Hasler M, Jung C (2018) Haplotype variation of flowering time genes of sugar beet and its wild relatives and the impact on life cycle regimes. Front Plant Sci 2211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojland JG, Pedersen L (1994) Sugar beet, beetroots, and fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris): dispersal, establishment and interactions with the enviornment. The National Forest and Nature Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker WJ (1835) The british flora. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A, Ober ES (2010) Possible change to arable crop yields by 2050. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2835–2851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PD, Lister DH, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2003) Future climate impact on the productivity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Europe. Clim Change 58:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita T (1965) Male sterility in Beta maritima L. Tensai Kenkyu Hokoku/Bull Sugar Beet Res Suppl. 5:60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazaki K, Arakawa T, Matsunaga M1, Yui-Kurino R, Matsuhira H1, Mikami T, Kubo T (2015) Post-translational mechanisms are associated with fertility restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant J. 83(2):290–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz KL (2005) Anatomy and physiology. In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, de Biaggi M (eds) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, NH, USA, pp 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes HW (1973) An enzyme theory of self-incompatibility. Incomp Newsl Assoc 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange W, Oleo M, de Bock TSM, D’Haeseleer M, Jacobs M (1993) Chromosomal assignment of three enzyme coding loci (Icd1, Nad-Mdh1 and Aco1) using primary trisomics in beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Breed 111:177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen K (1977) Self-incompatibility in Beta vulgaris L. I. Four gametophytic, complementary S-loci in sugar beet. Hereditas 85:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy. PhD Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 93-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT (1989) Registration of cytoplasmic male sterile sugarbeet germplasm C600CMS. Crop Sci 29:246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low EG (2007) Shingle biodiversity and habitat disturbance. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann V, McIntosh L, Theuer C, Hirschberg J (1989) A new cytoplasmic male sterile type in the sugar beet Beta vulgaris L.: a molecular analysis. Theor Appl Genet 78:293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhira H, Kagami H, Kurata M, Kitazaki K, Matsunaga M, Hamaguchi Y, Hagihara E, Ueda M, Harada M, Muramatsu A, Yui-Kurino R, Taguchi K, Tamagake H, Mikami T, Kubo T (2012) Unusual and typical features of a novel restorer-of-fertility gene of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Genetics 192(4):1347–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane JS (1975) Naturally occurring hybrids between sugarbeet and Beta macrocarpa in the Imperial Valley of California. J ASSBT 18:245–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer EH, Lehmann C, Boivin S, Brings L, de Cauwer I, Bock R, Kühn K, Touzet P (2018) CMS-G from Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima is maintained in natural populations despite containing an atypical cytochrome c oxidase. Biochem J 475:759–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris PC, Grierson D, Whttington WJ (1984) Endogenous inhibitors and germination of Beta vulgaris. J Exp Bot 35:994–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O (1910) Osservazioni sulla bietola selvaggia (Beta maritima L.). Staz Sper Ag Ital

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O (1920) Sulla salita in seme il primo anno delle bietole coltivate. Bollettino Associazione italiana delle Industrie dello Zucchero e dell’Alcool 90–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O, Mezzadroli G, Zapparoli TV (1913) Osservazioni sulla Beta maritima L., nel triennio 1910–1912. Stazioni Sperimentali Agricole Italiane 46:415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldemeyer RK (1957) Sugar beet male sterility. J ASSBT 9:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Orndruff R (1969) The importance or reproductive biology for taxonomy. Taxon 18:133–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1942a) Inheritance of cross- and self-sterility in Beta vulgaris L. J Agr Res 64:679–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1942b) Male sterility in sugar beet produced by complementary effects of cytoplasmic and Mendelian inheritance. Am J Bot 29:692

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1945) Cytoplasmically inherited male-sterility in sugar beets. J Agr Res 71:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1952) Mendelian male sterility in sugar beets. Proc ASSBF7:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Panella l, Lewellen RT (2007) Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives. Euphytica 154:382–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peto FH (1964) Methods of loosening tight seed caps in monogerm seed to improve germination. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 13:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard P, Raymond P, Curbineau F, Pradet A (1989) Effect of the pericarp on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed germination: study of the energy metabolism. Seed Sci Technol 17:485–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos DSB, Pereira MFA (1989) Restrictions of the tegument to the germination of Beta vulgaris L. seeds. Seed Sci Technol 17:601–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Saumitou-Laprade P, Rouwendal GJA, Cuguen J, Krens FA, Michaelis G (1993) Different CMS sources found in Beta vulgaris ssp maritima: mitochondrial variability in wild populations revealed by a rapid screening procedure. Theor Appl Genet 85:529–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky H (1950) A method of determining self-fertility of self sterility in sugar beet based upon the stage of ovule development shortly after flowering. Proc ASSBT 6:198–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Schondelmaier J, Jung C (1997) Chromosomal assignment of the nine linkage groups of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using primary trisomics. Theor Appl Genet 95:590–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott RK, Longden PC (1970) Pollen release by diploid and tetraploid sugar beet planta. Ann Appl Biol 66:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sester M, Dürr C, Darmency H, Colbach N (2006) Evolution of weed beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed bank: quantification of seed survival, dormancy, germination and pre-emergence growth. Eur J Agron 24:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL (1983) Influence of external factors on growth and development of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) (in English with Dutch summaries). Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GA (1987) Sugar Beet. In: Fehr WR (ed) Principles of Cultivar Development. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp 577-625

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Tarayre M (2000) Exploring the genetic basis and proximate causes of female fertility advantage in gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris. Evolution 54:1510–1520

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzet P, Villain S, Buret L, Martin H, Holl A-C, Poux C, Cuguen J (2018) Chloroplastic and nuclear diversity of wild beets at a large geographical scale: toward an evolutionary history of the Beta section. Ecol Evol 8:2890–2900. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H (1998) Variation for developmental characters in Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima in relation to latitude: The importance of in situ conservation. In: Frese L, Panella L, Srivastava HM, Lange W (eds) A report on the 4th international Beta genetic resources workshop and world Beta network Conference held at the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Izmir, Turkey, 28 Feb–3 Mar 1996. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H (2009) Ageing effects in an iteroparous plant species with a variable life span. Ann Bot 104:115–124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Boudry P (1992) Genetic varitaion for life histories in Beta maritima. International Beta Genetic Resoures Network. A report on the 2nd international WBN workshop, Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Braunschweig, Germany, 24–28 June 1991. IPGRI, Rome, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Boudry P, McCombie H, Vernet P (1997) Flowering time in wild beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) along a latitudinal cline. Acta Oecol 18:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Desplanque B (1999) European Beta: crops and their wild and weedy relatives. In: van Raamsdonk LWD, Den Nijs JCM (eds) Plant evolution in man-made habitats. Hugo de Vries Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Hautekèete NC (2007) Long day plants and the response to global warming: Rapid evolutionary change in day length sensitivity is possible in wild beet. Evol Biol 20:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, Hautekèete NC (2014) Evidence of genetic change in the flowering phenology of sea beets along a latitudinal cline within two decades. J Evol Biol 27:1420–9101

    Google Scholar 

  • Villain S (2007) Histoire evolutive de la section Beta. PhD Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Vleeshouwers LM, Bouwmeester HJ, Karssen CM (1995) Redefining seed dormancy: an attempt to integrate physiology and ecology. J Ecol 83:1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (1925) Geschichte der Rübe (Beta) als Kulturpflanze. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Proskowetz E (1894) Ãœber die Culturversuche mit Beta maritima L. (und Beta vulgaris L.) im Jahre 1893. Österreiche-Ungarische Zeitschrift für Zuckerindustrie und Landwirtschaft 31:201–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagmann K, Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, van Dijk H (2010) Potential for evolutionary change in the seasonal timing of germination in sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) mediated by seed dormancy. Genetica 138:763–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagmann K, Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, Meunier C, Schmitt E, van Dijk H (2012) Seed dormancy distribution: explanatory ecological factors. Ann Bot 110:1205–1219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weihe A, Dudareva NA, Veprev SG, Maletsky SI, Melzer R, Salganik RI, Borner T (1991) Molecular characterization of mitochondrial DNA of different subtypes of male-sterile cytoplasms of the sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet 82:11–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie W, Kang C, Wang J, Wang B, Guo D (1996) Molecular characterization of a new type of cytoplasmic male sterile sugar beet. Sci China Ser C Life Sci 39:53–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto MP, Kubo T, Mikami T (2005) The 5’-leader sequence of sugar beet mitochondrial atp6 encodes a novel polypeptide that is characteristic of Owen cytoplasmic male sterility. Molecular genetics and genomics. Mol Genet Genomics 273:342–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto MP, Shinada H, Onodera Y, Komaki C, Mikami T, Kubo T (2008) A male sterility-associated mitochondrial protein in wild beets causes pollen disruption in transgenic plants. Plant J 54:1027–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajkovskaja NE (1960) Pollen sterility in sugar beet (in Russian). Agrobiologia (Agrobiology) 778–780

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Hautekeete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hautekeete, N., van Dijk, H., Touzet, P., Biancardi, E. (2020). Physiology. In: Biancardi, E., Panella, L., McGrath, J. (eds) Beta maritima. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28748-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics