Abstract
At present, there is no unified theoretical framework to deal with environmental governance issues. Consequently, there is a diversity of interpretations of the concept at the public-political arena both nationally and internationally. Recent Latin American efforts have given a step forward conceptualizing environmental governance from the South and systematizing experiences to illustrate a diverse contemporaneous reality. At a regional scale, within the last decades, discursive turns in national policies such as the introduction of the sustainable development concept have triggered an increase in studies and applications of environmental governance (e.g., forest’s governance, climate change, marine coastal zones) including the use of the ecosystem services concept. The instrumentation of public actions in relation to environmental governance derives from the states. However, if analyzed with a beyond-the-States view, governance can be understood as a process involving the participation of governmental and non-governmental actors reaching decisions, for mutual benefits, through negotiation processes. However, there is not, still, within the countries of the region, inclusive and participative governance oriented toward the sustainable use of natural resources. Although there are many challenges, in this chapter we discuss two of them: (1) to build an analytical framework to understand the environmental governance modes currently available in Latin America and (2) to generate a new sociopolitical interdisciplinary framework involving both natural and sociopolitical systems as a contribution to a new analytical framework for environmental governance. In other words, new environmental governance for Latin America.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguilar M (2007) Reseña de “Gobernanza y gestión pública”. Foro Internacional, El Colegio de México, AC 47(2):443–447
Aguiar A, Mastrangelo ME, García Collazo MA et al (2018) ¿Cuál es la situación de la Ley de Bosques en la Región Chaqueña a diez años de su sanción? Revisar su pasado para discutir su futuro. Ecología Austral 28:400–417
Álvarez R, Ther F (2016) Fragmentos de una Cosmovisión Mesriza Asociada al acceso y uso del entorno costero en el Archipielago de Chiloé. Diálogo Andino 49:123–129
Arnouts R, van der Zouwen M, Arts B (2012) Analysing governance modes and shifts-Governace arragements in Dutch nature policy. Forest Policy Econ 16:43–50
Arts B, Van Tatenhove J, Leroy P (2000) Conclusions and research agenda: political modernisation and the dynamics of environmental policy arrangements. In: Tatenhove J, Arts B, Leroy P (eds) Political modernization and the environment. The renewal of environmental Policy Arrangements. Van Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 199–215
Arts B, Leroy P, Van Tatenhove J (2006) Political modernization and policy arrangements: a framework for understanding environmental policy change. Publ Organ Rev 6:93–106
Baldwin E, McCord P, Dell’Angelo J et al (2018) Collective action in a polycentric water gobernanza system. Environ Policy Gov 28:212–222
Basurto X, Gelcich S, Ostrom E (2013) The social ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Global Environ Change Hum Policy Dimen 23:1366–1380
Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D et al (2012) Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Env Resour 37(1):421–448
Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annu Rev Env Resour 34:253–278
Brunner R, Steelman T, Coe-Juell L et al (2005) Adaptive governance: integrating science, policy and decision making. Columbia University Press, New York
Buciega A, Esparcia J (2013) Desarrollo, Territorio y Capital Social. Un análisis a partir de dinámicas relacionales en el desarrollo rural. Redes 24(1):1–33
Calame P (2009) Hacia una revolución de la gobernanza: reinventar la democracia. LOM Ediciones, Santiago
Calix JA (2016) Enfoques de Desarrollo en América Latina-Hacia una transformación Social-Ecológica. Análisis 1:1–36
Carlisle KM, Gruby RL (2018) Why the path to polycentricity matters: evidence from fisheries governance in Palau. Environ Policy Gov 28:223–235
Castro F, Hogenboom B, Boud M (eds) (2015) Gobernanza Ambiental en América Latina. Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires. CLACSO, Buenos Aires
Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship. Ecol Soc 19(3):56. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356. Accessed 9 Jun 2019
Contesse M, Van Vliet BJM, Lenhart J (2018) Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile. Land Use Policy 71:566–577
Córdova Montúfar M (2018) Gobernanza y políticas públicas. La seguridad ciudadana de Bogotá y Quito. Editorial Universidad del Rosario/Flacso
Cruz-Garcia GS, Sachet E, Blundo-Canto G et al (2017) To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia and Latin America? Ecosyst Serv 25:201–212
Delgado LE, Marin VH, Bachmann P et al (2009) Conceptual models for ecosystem management through the participation of local social actors: the río cruces wetland conflict. Ecol Soc 14(1):50
Delgado LE, Tironi A, Vila I et al (2014) El humedal del Río Cruces, Valdivia Chile: una síntesis ecosistémica. Lat Am J Aquat Res 42:937–949
Delgado LE, Torres-Gomez M, Tironi A et al (2015) Estrategia de Adaptación Local al cambio Climático para el acceso equitativo al agua en zonas rurales de Chile. Rev Am Latina Hoy 69:113–137
Delgado LE, Marín VH (2016) Well-being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed, southern Chile. Ecosyst Serv 21:81–91
Delgado LE, Tironi-Silva A, Marín VH (2019) Sistemas socioecológicos y servicios ecosistémicos: modelos conceptuales para el humedal del Río Cruces (Valdivia, Chile). In: Cerda C, Silva-Rodriguez E, Briceño C (eds) Naturaleza en sociedad: Una mirada a la dimensión humana de la conservación de ls biodiversidad. Editorial OchoLibros, Santiago, pp 177–205
Díaz, S Demissew S, Carabias J et al (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912
Duffield M (2001) Las nuevas guerras y el mundo global. La convergencia entre desarrollo y seguridad. Cataratas, Madrid
Eakin H, Lemos MC (2006) Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization. Glob Environ Chang 16:7–8
Figueroa LM, Gutiérrez RA (2018) Enfrentados por el ambiente: incidencia de las coaliciones sociedad-estado en la protección de bosques nativos. In: Gutiérrez RA (ed) Construir el ambiente: sociedad, estado y políticas ambientales en Argentina. Teseo, Buenos Aires, pp 103–166
Garrick D, Heikkila T, Villamayor-Tomas S et al (2018) The lens of polycentricity: Identifying polycentric governance systems illustrated through examples from the field of water governance. Environ Policy Gov 28:236–251
Hogenboom B, Baud M, de Castro F (2012) Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina: hacia agenda de investigación integradora. Revista del Centro Andino de Estudios Internacionales 12:51–71
Kooiman J (2003) Governing as governance. Sage Publications, London
Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Laterra P, Martín-López B, Mastrangelo M et al (2017) Servicios ecosistémicos en Latinoamérica: de la investigación a la acción. Ecol Austral 27:94–98
Latour B (2005) Re-assembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Env Resour 31:297–325
Leroy P, Arts B (2014) Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Berlín
Marín VH, Delgado LE, Tironi-Silva A et al (2018) Exploring social-ecological complexities of wetlands of international importance (Ramsar sites): the Carlos Anwandter Sanctuary (Valdivia, Chile) as a case study. Wetlands 38:1171–1182
Martínez Alier J (2014) El ecologismo de los pobres. Editorial Quimantú, Santiago de Chile
McGinnis MD, Ostrom E (2014) Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol Soc 19(2):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
MINAGRI (2009) Reglamento general de la ley sobre recuperación del bosque nativo y fomento forestal Nro 20.283. Ministerio de Agricultura, Santiago
Nahuelhual L, Donoso P, Lara A et al (2007) Valuing ecosystem services of Chilean temperate rainforests. Environ Dev Sustain 9:481–499
Natenzon C, Ríos D (2015) Una revisión sobre catástrofes, riesgo y ciencias sociales. In: Natenzon C, Ríos D (eds) Riesgos, catástrofes y vulnerabilidades: aportes desde la geografía y otras ciencias sociales para casos argentinos. Ediciones Imago Mundi, Buenos Aires, pp 1–27
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422
Paavola J (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63:93–103
Paredes L (2019) Desarrollo de un modelo conceptual para el manejo de servicios ecosistémicos costeros: Isla Grande de Chiloé. Tesis para optar al cargo de Magíster en Gestión y Planificación Ambiental. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Universidad de Chile, Santiago
Pellet PF, Ugarte E, Osorio E et al (2005) Biodiversity conservation in Chile, legally enough? The need for mapping the law before deciding. Rev Chil Hist Nat 78:125–141
Perevchtchikova M (ed) (2014) Pago por servicios ambientales en México. Un acercamiento para su estudio. El Colegio de México AC, México DF
Piccolo JJ (2017) Intrinsic values in nature: objective good or simply half of an unhelpful dichotomy? J Nat Conserv 37(1):8–11
Pittman J, Armitage D (2019) Network governance of land-sea social-ecological systems in the Lesser Antilles. Ecol Econ 157:61–70
Primmer E, Jokinen P, Blicharska M et al (2015) Governance of ecosystem services: a framework for empirical analysis. Ecosyst Serv 16:158–166
Reyes R, Sepulveda C, Astorga L (2014) Gobernanza del Sector Forestal Chileno: Tensiones y Conflictos entre las Fuerzas de Mercado y las Demandas de la Ciudadania. In: González DCM, Lara A (eds) Ecología forestal. Bases para el manejo sustentable y conservación de los bosques nativos de Chile. Ediciones Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, pp 693–720
Sarkki S (2017) Governance services: co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 27:82–91
Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:8349–8356
Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H et al (2015) Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital: Fig. 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7369–7374
Schöder NJS (2018) The lens of polycentricity: identifying polycentric governance systems illustrated through examples from the field of water governance. Environ Policy Gov 28:236–251
Swyngedouw E (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Stud 42:1991–2006
Yu Iwama A, Delgado LE (2018) Acción: Participación Comunitaria en Procesos de decisión en la Conservación del territorio. Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 56:1–3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Delgado, L.E. et al. (2019). A New Environmental Governance. In: Delgado, L., Marín, V. (eds) Social-ecological Systems of Latin America: Complexities and Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28452-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28452-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28451-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28452-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)