Skip to main content

Complex and Supercomplex Adaptive Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supercomplexity in Interaction
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter starts by looking at complex systems theory and, more importantly, complex adaptive systems theory; these systems are defined, their features are outlined and the items that make up the systems are described. Important phenomena such as boundaries and balance are addressed. It is also shown how complex systems theory fits in with other systems theories. An important point in this chapter is the introduction of supercomplex systems and, more precisely, supercomplex adaptive systems and the characteristics of them. It is important to understand these systems and how they work as they are developed in detail in the subsequent chapters. This chapter ends with a section outlining how the term supercomplexity has been used in other work and how it is used in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some work by Baianu the term ultracomplex was used but it seems that supercomplex has become the adopted term for frequent use.

References

  • Arnold, R., and J. Wade. 2015. A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science 44: 669–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baicchi, A. 2015. Construction learning as a complex adaptive system. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu, I., and R. Poli. 2011. From simple to complex and ultra-complex systems: A paradigm shift towards non-abelian systems dynamics. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana, Trento University and Mitteleuropa Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. 2014. The university in an age of supercomplexity: Challenges and possibilities. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabej, N. 2015. Building the most complex structure on Earth: An epigenetic narrative of development and evolution of animals. Academic Press and Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. 2001. Complex adaptive systems. ESD.83 Research Seminar in Engineering Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 2016. Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. In Critical Complexity, ed. PaulHG Cilliers, 85–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 2001. Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowcroft, J. 2019. Introduction to network theory. [Online] Available at https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1011/PrincComm/slides/graph_theory_1-11.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  • Colchester, J. 2016. Innovation home—Systems innovation. Systems Innovation. [Online] Available at https://complexitylabs.io/complex-system/?print-posts=word. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  • Cottingham, J., R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. 1985. The philosophical writings of descartes. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., D. Sumara, and R. Luce-Kapler. 2008. Engaging minds. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodder, R., and R. Dare. 2000. Complex adaptive systems and complexity theory: Inter-related knowledge domains. Cambridge: Complex Adaptive Systems and Complexity Theory: Inter-related Knowledge Domains by Rebecca Dodder and Robert DareESD.83: Research Seminar in Engineering Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducard, G. 2017. Modeling and analysis of dynamic systems. Zürich: Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnam Street. 2019. An introduction to complex adaptive systems. [Online] Available at https://fs.blog/2014/04/mental-model-complex-adaptive-systems/. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2016. On the critiques of the concept of sex: An interview with Anne Fausto-Sterling. differences 27 (1): 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivaz, R. 1994. The nature of order in complex systems. Systems Research 11: 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. 2016. How change happens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, F. 2018. Shaked, H., and Schechter, C. (2017). Systems thinking for school leaders: Holistic leadership for excellence in education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Leadership and Policy in Schools 17 (4): 647–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, L., S. Higgins, K. Livingston, and D. Wyse. 2017. Living with supercomplexity. The Curriculum Journal 28 (2): 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P. 2008. History of mathematics—A short history of dynamical systems theory: 1885–2007. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogduin, Lex. 2016. Complexity, uncertainty and economic policy. Paper prepared for the OECD-EC-INET Oxford Workshop on Complexity and Policy, 29–30 September, OECD HQ, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. 2012. Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics? Mélanges CRAPEL 33 (Special Edition): 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, David. 1999. Geography and moral education in a super complex world: The significance of values education and some remaining dilemmas. Philosophy & Geography 2 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668799908573652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2013. Complexity theory: A new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 13 (2): 369–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., X. Duan, C. Zhao, and L. Xu. 2013. Systems science: Methodological approaches (Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (ASSE)), 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louie, A. 2010. Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight 12 (3): 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola, T., and D. Nelson. 2014. Systems theory. [Online] Available at https://www.slideserve.com/ray-dorsey/csc551-systems-theory-living-systemstheory.

  • Meadows, D.H. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. 2003. Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Y. 2014. Complex systems and networks. [Online] Available at https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/ern/docs/ev_20140623_co03_en.pdf.

  • New England Complex Systems Institute. 2019. Concepts: Adaptive—New England complex systems institute. [Online] Available at http://www.necsi.edu/guide/concepts/adaptive.html. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  • Osberg, D., G. Biesta, and P. Cilliers. 2008. From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (1): 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, S., and Simmering, V. 2017. Applications of dynamic systems theory to cognition and development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 52: 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinazo-Calatayud, D. 2006. An approach to the study of emotions As complex dynamical systems. Electronic Magazine of Motivation and Emotion 9 (22): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickles, D., P. Hawe, and A. Shiell. 2007. A simple guide to chaos and complexity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61 (11): 933–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1985. Anticipatory systems. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevaldson, B. 2011. Giga-mapping: Visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Ocean Design Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., and E. Thelen. 2003. Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8): 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirkin, A. 1983. Dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stave, K.A., Hopper, M. 2008. Assessing the effectiveness of systems thinking interventions in the classroom. 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education (THE). 2019. New life amid chaos. [Online] Available at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/new-life-amid-chaos/156411.article. Accessed 22 March 2019.

  • Tyers, D. 2015. Using dynamic systems theory as a conceptual framework to understand the interaction of culture and language in language education. 15th IALIC Conference Intercultural Communication in Social Practice.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Orange .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orange, V. (2019). Complex and Supercomplex Adaptive Systems. In: Supercomplexity in Interaction. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28018-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics