Skip to main content

Will Fusion Become Commercial?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor

Abstract

The road to fusion energy is now in its third stage. Between 1970 and 1980 the first reactors, such as the United States’ TFTR, Europe’s JET, and Japan’s JT-60, demonstrated the scientific feasibility of fusion making it clear that the concepts developed by researchers were valid and functioning. Second, a large machine had to be built to demonstrate technological feasibility by producing large quantities of energy and testing certain technologies essential to building a fusion reactor. This is the milestone that ITER represents. Third, a machine should demonstrate the commercial viability of an industrial prototype and produce electricity. This will be a demonstration fusion power reactor (DEMO). Each ITER member has already defined the broad lines of what its own DEMO might be. It may open the door to industrial exploitation. What does this mean exactly? ITER is expected to produce 500 MW of thermal fusion power compared with about 50 MW that will be injected for the purposes of heating plasma. This represents a “gain factor” of 10. However, if we want to estimate the energy efficiency of a tokamak and its potential use as an energy source on the industrial scale, we should consider not only the heating power injected into the plasma but the power that will be supplied to all its equipment and systems during the experiment (all necessary to keep the plasma at a given temperature). The industrial viability of fusion energy will only be proven if the output power exceeds the power consumed by the complete installation. What would be the point from an economic point of view of ITER producing 500 MW if it turns out that the average electricity consumption on site is the same, or perhaps even more? Before fusion can become an industrial source of energy yet another major challenge is to identify the best economic conditions for its industrial exploitation. This involves, in particular, finding new structural materials for tokamaks. Last but not least the supply of some existing materials might be an issue in the industrial age of fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is the record for a civil experiment. We do not have much information about experiments carried out during military operations or tests of nuclear weapons, which are discussed in the penultimate chapter. However, the hydrogen bomb is so far the only manmade device to achieve a gain factor of more than 1.

  2. 2.

    This assumes that the order of magnitude of Q is confirmed and that the construction and operational costs of future tokamaks are compatible with the economic sustainability of the technology.

  3. 3.

    Actually, we should take into account the fact that the 16 MW represents thermal power, while the 700 MW represents electrical power. As the conversion factor between thermal and electrical power is about 1/3, this means that the engineering gain factor is only 0.007.

  4. 4.

    https://w3.pppl.gov/tftr/info/aps9903/GP01_104-BellM.pdf.

  5. 5.

    Arnoux [1].

  6. 6.

    http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/iter/ITER-fusion-reactor-investigation.shtml.

  7. 7.

    However, the following sentence, which is still online, is misleading: “ITER is designed to produce a ten times return on invested energy: 500 MW of fusion power from 50 MW of input heating power (Q = 10)”, https://www.iter.org/sci/Goals.

  8. 8.

    As explained in the final report on ITER’s technical design (ITER EDA Documentation Series n°21, AIEA, Vienna, 2001): “The overall programmatic objective of ITER is to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion power for peaceful purposes. ITER would accomplish this objective by demonstrating controlled ignition and extended burn of deuterium–tritium plasmas, with steady-state as an ultimate goal, by demonstrating technologies essential to a reactor in an integrated system, and by performing integrated testing of the high-heat-flux and nuclear components required to utilize fusion energy for practical purposes”.

  9. 9.

    Janeschitz [2].

  10. 10.

    Entered into force on June 1, 2007 for at least 10 years the Broader Approach Agreement, concluded between the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and Japan, consists of activities that aim to complement the ITER project and to accelerate the realization of fusion energy through research and development and advanced technologies for future demonstration fusion power reactors (DEMOs). Both parties contribute equally financially. The Broader Approach covers three main projects being built in Japan: an International Fusion Energy Research Centre (IFERC) equipped with a supercomputer in Rokkasho-Mura for modeling and simulation studies; a prototype for IFMIF, a future facility for neutron production also located in Rokkasho-Mura; and a “satellite” reactor to optimize plasma operation in ITER and to investigate advanced operating modes for a DEMO to be tested at the ITER facility located in Naka. The Broader Approach Agreement should be extended for a further 10 years.

  11. 11.

    Pacchioni [3].

References

  1. Arnoux R (November 28, 2016) The balance of power. In: Newsline. https://www.iter.org/newsline/-/2589

  2. Janeschitz G (2019) An economical viable tokamak fusion reactor based on the ITER experience. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci A 377:20170433. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pacchioni G (2019) The road to fusion. Nat Rev Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0069-8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Claessens .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Claessens, M. (2020). Will Fusion Become Commercial?. In: ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27580-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27581-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics