Skip to main content

Momentum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership OS
  • 758 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors introduce the second element of their Leadership OS model, momentum. Using both their own and previous research, they describe the four components of momentum—motivation, empowerment, confidence and connection. They reveal the research showing the functions momentum plays in a leaders’ Operating System—how it affects people’s performance. And they introduce a case study that highlights the role and importance of momentum in leadership (Tony Hsieh, CEO of Zappo’s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Halbesleben and A. Wheeler, “The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave,” Work & Stress, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 242–256, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Slater, S. Haslam and N. Steffens, “Singing it for ‘us’: Team passion displayed during national anthems is associated with subsequent success,” European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 541–549, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Green Jr., E. Finkel, G. Fitzsimons and F. Gino, “The energizing nature of work engagement: Toward a new need-based theory of work motivation,” Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 1–18, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Hays, O. Thomas, I. Maynard and M. Bawden, “The role of confidence in world-class sport performance,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1185–1199, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Moritz, D. Feltz, K. Fahrbach and D. Mack, “The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review,” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 280–294, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The Centre for Army Leadership, “The army leadership code” [Online]. Available: https://www.army.mod.uk/media/2698/ac72021_the_army_leadership_code_an_introductory_guide.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  7. F. Mendes and M. Stander, “Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention,” South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Xu and H. Cooper Thomas, “How can leaders achieve high employee engagement?” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 399–416, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Schunk and P. Ertmer, “Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions,” in M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 631–649.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Harter, F. Schmidt and T. Hayes, “Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 2, p. 268, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Pfeffer and R. Sutton, “Profiting from evidence-based management,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 35–42, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Walumbwa, B. Avolio and W. Zhu, “How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 793–825, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Britt, C. Castro and A. Adler, “Self-engagement, stressors, and health: A longitudinal study,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1475–1486, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Christian, A. Garza and J. Slaughter, “Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 89–136, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AON, “2018 trends in global employee engagement,” New York, NY: AON Plc., 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Wollard and B. Shuck, “Antecedents to employee engagement: A structured review of the literature,” Advances in Developing Human Resources, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 429–446, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Bailey, A. Madden, K. Alfes and L. Fletcher, “The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–53, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Bakker, “Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions,” European Psychologist, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 227–236, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Breevaart, A. Bakker, J. Hetland, E. Demerouti, O. Olsen and R. Espevik, “Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 138, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kinley, N., Ben-Hur, S. (2020). Momentum. In: Leadership OS. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27293-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics