Skip to main content

Introduction: The Gothic in Contemporary British Trauma Fiction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Gothic in Contemporary British Trauma Fiction
  • 450 Accesses

Abstract

Critics tend to view the Gothic as a means of fulfilling trauma theory’s ethical imperative of evoking in readers an empathic identification with the Gothic/psychoanalytic subject. Doing so, however, relies on problematic assumptions about the inevitability of ethical responses from writers and audiences alike. This monograph re-evaluates the link between trauma and the Gothic through six British novels: Martin Amis’s London Fields (1989), Margaret Drabble’s The Gates of Ivory (1991), Ian McEwan’s Atonement (2001), Pat Barker’s Regeneration (1991) and Double Vision (2003), and Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005). Over the course of these texts, a progression emerges towards greater awareness of the ethical contradictions existing within literary trauma studies, which are brought to light by the Gothic conventions appearing in these narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These include, in addition to Caruth, Shoshana Felman, Dori Laub, and Geoffrey Hartman.

  2. 2.

    Felman and Laub theorize the Holocaust as a crisis of history and of representation that is analogous to the post-structuralist notion, elaborated by Paul De Man and others, of the slippage between language (sign) and that to which it refers (referent). Caruth (1996) later applies this loss of referentiality (in combination with Freudian models of memory) to the relationship between trauma and victim and, by extension, testimony and listener, leading her to envision trauma as a perpetually “unclaimed” experience (p. 10).

  3. 3.

    Steven Bruhm (2002) notes the “enormous popularity of the Gothic … since the Second World War,” attributing this surge in popularity partially to the ways in which the genre “play[s] with chronology, looking back to moments in an imaginary history, pining for a social stability that never existed” (p. 259).

  4. 4.

    For example, the Cambodian genocide, which is the focus of Margaret Drabble’s The Gates of Ivory, discussed in Chap. 3.

  5. 5.

    The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-VI) includes “numbing of general responsiveness” alongside “persistent symptoms of increased arousal” as characteristics of post-traumatic stress disorder (APA 2000, p. 463). The links between trauma and the Gothic will be discussed in further detail later in this chapter.

  6. 6.

    The abject is theorized by Julia Kristeva (1982) as neither subject nor object, sharing “only one quality of the object—that of being opposed to I” (p. 2). The abject, for Kristeva, is all that which is composite and which threatens the ideal of the unified self, and is hence cast off as filth. The abject “relates to a boundary, and, more particularly, represents the object jettisoned out of that boundary, its other side, a margin” (p. 69). “And yet,” Kristeva argues, “from its place of banishment, the abject does not cease challenging its master” (p. 2). In the context of the Gothic, the abject presents a point of entry into understanding the overdetermined Gothic villain or monster, which Jack Halberstam (1991) argues “always represents the disruption of categories, the destruction of boundaries, and the presence of impurities” (p. 27), whether or not the narratives that peddle the monster as impure can, in fact, be trusted. Jerrold Hogle (2002) connects the Kristevan abject directly with the “Gothic others or spaces ” that “can abject myriad cultural and psychological contradictions,” in order to confront audiences with “the hidden reality that oppositions of all kinds cannot maintain their separations,” and “that each ‘lesser term’ is contained in its counterpart” (p. 11).

  7. 7.

    Bruhm names, in addition to “The Uncanny,” Freud’s “A Seventeenth-Century Demonological Neurosis” as an example.

  8. 8.

    Here Beville is likely relying on Burke’s contention that what is “dark, uncertain, confused, [and] terrible” is “sublime to the last degree” (Burke 2008, pp. 102–103). Beville is not the only critic to have picked up on this particular aspect of Burke’s argument in order to emphasize terror and a concern for the unrepresentable as core elements of the Gothic; Wright (2007) argues that “Burke demonstrates with force that terror, intimately connected with the fear of subjection and death, is the ‘ruling principle of the sublime’” (p. 40), and that “By challenging the certainties of representation, the Gothic sublime continues to challenge the essence of representability” (p. 56).

  9. 9.

    This notion follows Mary Favret’s argument in War at a Distance that the origins of the contemporary experience of wartime as an event occurring “at a distance, outside and beyond our reach” and yet “somehow fugitive and omnipresent at one” can be located in the Romantic period (p. 4). Her study of literature and art produced during the Napoleonic wars suggests that these wars are distinctly contemporary in part due to their infiltration into everyday life by a burgeoning print media, which made wartime “less … an object of cognition bounded by dates … and more … an affecting experience which resonates beyond the here and now” (p. 11). Favret’s theorization of modern warfare as part of the “long eighteenth century” is discussed in detail in Chap. 3.

  10. 10.

    Derrida (1992) proposes that “a text would not belong to any genre. Every text participates in one or several genres, there is no genreless text, there is always a genre and genres, yet such participation never amounts to belonging” (p. 230, original emphasis).

References

  • Aguirre, Manuel. 2008. Geometries of Terror: Numinous Spaces in Gothic, Horror and Science Fiction. Gothic Studies 10 (2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikin, Anna Laetitia. 1773. On the Pleasure Derived from Objects of Terror. In Miscellaneous Pieces in Prose, ed. J. Aikin and A.L. Barbauld, 119–137. London: Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., Ron Eyerman, Bernard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser, and Piotr Sztompka. 2004. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TSR). Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amis, Martin. 1989. London Fields. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, Chris, and Robert Mighall. 2001. Gothic Criticism. In A New Companion to the Gothic, ed. David Punter, 267–287. Hoboken: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beville, Maria. 2009. Gothic-Postmodernism: Voicing the Terrors of Postmodernity. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Gothic Memory and the Contested Past: Framing Terror. In The Gothic and the Everyday: Living Gothic, ed. Lorna Piatti-Farnell and Maria Beville, 52–68. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomarito, Jessica. 2006. Gothic Literature: A Gale Critical Companion. Vol. 1. Farmington Hills: Thomson/Gale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhm, Steven. 2002. Contemporary Gothic: Why We Need It. In The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction, ed. Jerrold E. Hogle, 259–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund. 2008. In A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Adam Phillips. Oxford: Oxford U Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Angela. 1974. Afterword. In Fireworks: Nine Profane Pieces, 132–133. London: Quartet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruth, Cathy. 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craps, Stef. 2014. Beyond Eurocentrism: Trauma Theory in the Global Age. In The Future of Trauma Theory: Contemporary Literary and Cultural Criticism, ed. Gert Buelens and Robert Eaglestone, 45–62. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosthwaite, Paul. 2007. Speed, War, and Traumatic Affect: Reading Ian McEwan’s Atonement. Cultural Politics 3 (1): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A.R. 2008. Rethinking Historical Trauma: Narratives of Resilience. Transcultural Psychiatry 45 (3): 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992. The Law of Genre. In Acts of Literature, ed. Derek Attridge, 221–252. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Kirby. 1998. Post-traumatic Culture: Injury and Interpretation in the Nineties. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felman, Shoshana, and Dori Laub. 1992. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1950. Remembering, Repeating and Working-Through (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psycho-Analysis II) (1914). Standard Edition 12: 45–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Uncanny (1919). In Psychological Writings and Letters, ed. Sander L. Gilman, 120–153. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund, and Joseph Breuer. 1974. Studies on Hysteria (1895). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamer, Michael. 2000. Romanticism and the Gothic: Genre, Reception and Canon Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gampel, Yolanda. 2000. Reflections on the Prevalence of the Uncanny in Social Violence. In Cultures Under Siege: Collective Violence and Trauma, ed. Antonius C.G.M. Robben and Marcelo M. Suarez-Orozco, 48–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, Jack (Judith). 1991. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Geoffrey. 1995. On Traumatic Knowledge and Literary Studies. New Literary History 26 (3): 537–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockenhull, Stella. 2010. Sublime Landscapes in Contemporary British Horror: The Last Great Wilderness and Eden Lake. Horror Studies 1 (2): 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogle, Jerrold E., ed. 2002. Introduction: The Gothic in Western Culture. In The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogle, Jerold, and Andrew Smith. 2009. Revisiting the Gothic and Theory: An Introduction. Gothic Studies 11 (1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, Coral Ann. 1995. Love, Mystery and Misery: Feeling in Gothic Fiction. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansteiner, Wulf. 2004. Genealogy of a Category Mistake: A Critical Intellectual History of the Cultural Trauma Metaphor. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 8 (2): 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCapra, Dominick. 1998. History and Memory after Auschwitz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, Dori. 1992. Bearing Witness, or the Vicissitudes of Listening. In Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History, co-auth. Shoshana Felman and Dori Laub, 57–74. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Titus. 2011. Human Rights Storytelling and Trauma Narrative in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. Journal of Human Rights 10 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, Roger. 2006. Mixing Memory and Desire: Psychoanalysis, Psychology, and Trauma Theory. In Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide, ed. Patricia Waugh, 497–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Trauma Question. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Beyond Trauma: Torturous Times. European Journal of English Studies 14 (1): 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massé, Michelle A. 2012. Psychoanalysis and the Gothic. In A New Companion to the Gothic, ed. David A. Punter, 307–320. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Robert. 2002. Gothic Writing 1750–1820: A Genealogy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modlinger, Martin, and Philipp Sonntag. 2011. Other People’s Pain: Narratives of Trauma and the Question of Ethics. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piatti-Farnell, Lorna, and Maria Beville. 2014. Introduction: Living Gothic. In The Gothic and the Everyday: Living Gothic, ed. Lorna Piatti Farnell and Maria Beville, 1–12. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radstone, Susannah. 2011. Trauma Studies: Contexts, Politics, Ethics. In Other People’s Pain: Narratives of Trauma and the Question of Ethics, ed. Martin Modlinger and Philipp Sonntag, 63–90. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1986. The Coherence of Gothic Conventions. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, Catherine. 2006. Contemporary Gothic. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, Terrie, Nick Flynn, Blaffer Gallery, and Grey Art Gallery. 2008. Damaged Romanticism: A Mirror of Modern Emotion. Houston: Blaffer Gallery, the Art Museum of the University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, Sara, and Emily Alder, eds. 2014. Introduction. In Gothic Science Fiction 1980–2010, 1–20. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Anne. 2004. Trauma Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Gilda. 2007. The Gothic. Aldgate and Cambridge: Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Angela. 2007. Gothic Fiction: A Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Joyce, A. (2019). Introduction: The Gothic in Contemporary British Trauma Fiction. In: The Gothic in Contemporary British Trauma Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26728-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics