Skip to main content

The Consequences of Generosity: From the Interpersonal to the Collective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Science of Generosity
  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the consequences of generosity for individual givers, for interpersonal relationships, for organizations, networks, communities, and institutions, and for society, more generally, in the sphere of culture, religion, politics, and economics. For givers and receivers, some of these consequences play out in an ongoing, reciprocal process involving both rewards and sanctions, such as generosity within marital dynamics, groups, and workplaces. Findings on the dynamics of generosity within social networks, especially the flow of generous activities across social ties, are also described. Not all consequences of generosity are necessarily desirable. These multiple levels of outcomes form rippling consequences of generosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acs, Zoltan. 2013. Why Philanthropy Matters: How the Wealthy Give, and What It Means for Our Economic Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, Coren L., Frank W. Marlowe, James H. Fowler, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2012. Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers. Nature 481 (7382): 497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbesman, Samuel, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2011. Scaling of Prosocial Behavior in Cities. Physica A 390 (11): 2155–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman, Emily. 2017. The Social Bases of Philanthropy. Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Arthur C. 2007. Does Giving Make Us Prosperous? Journal of Economics and Finance; New York 31 (3): 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, Joseph Andrew. 2013. Ripples of Generosity in the Workplace: The Benefits of Giving, Getting, and Glimpsing. UC Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, Joseph, Kristin Layous, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2015. Recalling Positive Events at Work Makes Employees Feel Happier, Move More, but Interact Less: A 6-Week Randomized Controlled Intervention at a Japanese Workplace. Journal of Happiness Studies 16 (4): 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, Joseph, Seth Margolis, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2018a. The Propagation of Everyday Prosociality in the Workplace. The Journal of Positive Psychology 13 (3): 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, Joseph, Seth Margolis, Katherine Jacobs Bao, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2018b. Everyday Prosociality in the Workplace: The Reinforcing Benefits of Giving, Getting, and Glimpsing. Emotion 18 (4): 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A. 1974. Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A., and Rose Laub Coser. 1974. The Housewife and Her ‘Greedy Family’. In Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment, 88–100. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dew, Jeffrey, and W. Bradford Wilcox. 2013. Generosity and the Maintenance of Marital Quality. Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (5): 1218–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, Alnoor, and V. Kasturi Rangan. 2010. The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Marc J., and Kristi Yuthas. 2017. Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies and Impact Investors. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, James H., and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2010. Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (12): 5334–5338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudiani, Claire. 2010. Generosity Unbound: How American Philanthropy Can Strengthen the Economy and Expand the Middle Class. New York: Broadway Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, Arthur, and Anne-Claire Pache. 2015. Research on Corporate Philanthropy: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (3): 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, Kristin A. 2007. Foundations of Feminism: How Philanthropic Patrons Shaped Gender Politics. Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1174–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young-Il, and Jeffrey Dew. 2016. Marital Investments and Community Involvement: A Test of Coser’s Greedy Marriage Thesis. Sociological Perspectives 59 (4): 743–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapwijk, Anthon, and Paul A.M. Van Lange. 2009. Promoting Cooperation and Trust in ‘Noisy’ Situations: The Power of Generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (1): 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konow, James, and Joseph Earley. 2008. The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier? Journal of Public Economics 92 (1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layous, Kristin, Joseph Chancellor, and Sonja Lyubomirsky. 2014. Positive Activities as Protective Factors against Mental Health Conditions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 123 (1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, Lela P., and Sukhsimranjit Singh. 2013. Following the Golden Rule and Finding Gold: Generosity and Success in Negotiation. In Educating Negotiators for a Connected World, ed. Christopher Honeyman, James R. Coben, and Andrew Wei-Min Lee. Saint Paul: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, Sonja, Joseph Chancellor, and Jacobs Katherine. n.d. Lyubomirsky, Sonja Final Report – Ripples of Generosity in the Workplace: The Hedonic and Behavioral Benefits of Giving and Receiving. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, Karen, and Kellie Liket. 2011a. Social Impact Measurement: Classification of Methods. In Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management, 171–202. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (3): 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, A. James, Samuel Arbesman, Darby Miller Steiger, James H. Fowler, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2012. Egocentric Social Network Structure, Health, and Pro-Social Behaviors in a National Panel Study of Americans. PLoS One 7 (5): e36250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osburg, Thomas, and René Schmidpeter, eds. 2013. Social Innovation: Solutions for a Sustainable Future, CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, Markus, and Chris Moore. 2017. Preschoolers’ Generosity Increases with Understanding of the Affective Benefits of Sharing. Developmental Science 20 (3): e12417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, David G., Samuel Arbesman, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2011. Dynamic Social Networks Promote Cooperation in Experiments with Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (48): 19193–19198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, Lyle, and James P. Allan. 2006. The Material Consequences of Welfare States: Benefit Generosity and Absolute Poverty in 16 OECD Countries. Comparative Political Studies 39 (7): 880–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian, and Hilary Davidson. 2014. The Paradox of Generosity: Giving We Receive, Grasping We Lose. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ule, Aljaž, Arthur Schram, Arno Riedl, and Timothy N. Cason. 2009. Indirect Punishment and Generosity Toward Strangers. Science 326 (5960): 1701–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, James D., and Max S. Wortman. 2000. Strategic Philanthropy: Responding to Negative Portrayals of Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review 3 (2): 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Jeffrey Dew. 2016. The Social and Cultural Predictors of Generosity in Marriage: Gender Egalitarianism, Religiosity, and Familism. Journal of Family Issues 37 (1): 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herzog, P.S. (2020). The Consequences of Generosity: From the Interpersonal to the Collective. In: The Science of Generosity. Palgrave Studies in Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26500-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26500-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26499-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26500-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics