Abstract
This chapter focuses on the sound-symbolism-based approach, which has been dominant in onomatopoeia research. It is often claimed in sound-symbolism research that there is a systematic or non-arbitrary link between sound and meaning. This view of onomatopoeia presents a particular challenge to de Saussure’s (1916) notion that the link between word, form, and meaning is completely arbitrary. However, it will be argued that the context dependency of onomatopoeia means that what appears to be a systematic link between sound and meaning is a result of humans’ inferential processes. Sound symbolism is a repertoire of links that humans are capable of making between sound and meaning, rather than such links existing independently of the human mind. This leads to the main relevance-theoretic analysis of onomatopoeia presented in Chap. 3.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Akita (2013b) for a fuller discussion of research development in sound-symbolism studies.
- 2.
I will return to this point in Chap. 3.
- 3.
http://www.writtensound.com/index.php?term=tack+tack+tack. Accessed 20 October 2017.
- 4.
https://outlandishblog.com/about-high-heels/. Accessed 12 May 2019.
- 5.
https://hellogiggles.com/fashion/stopped-high-heels. Accessed 20 October 2017.
- 6.
In relevance theory, on which this study is based, metaphor or metonymy interpretation is seen as a pragmatic process, not a semantic process. I will return to the notion of semantic extension in Chap. 4.
- 7.
Kanayama Kazuhiko ryu Chahan no gokui & Okazu no moto special. [Kazuhiko-Kanayama style, The secret of fried rice & other dishes (my translation)].
Bibliography
Ahlner, Felix, and Jordan Zlatev. 2010. Cross-Modal Iconicity: A Cognitive Semiotic Approach to Sound Symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4): 298–348.
Akita, Kimi. 2009. A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. Kobe: Kobe University.
———. 2013a. Kyoki Tokusei Kara Miru Onomatope No Fureemu Riron. In Onomatope Kenkyu No Shatei: Chikazuku Oto to Imi , ed. Kazuko Shinohara and Ryoko Uno, 101–116. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
———. 2013b. Onomatope/Otoshocho No Kenkyu-Shi. In Onomatope Kenkyu No Shatei: Chikazuku Oto to Imi , ed. Kazuko Shinohara and Ryoko Uno, 333–364. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
———. 2013c. Constraints on the Semantic Extension of Onomatopoeia. Public Journal of Semiotics 5 (1): 21–37.
Akita, Kimi, and Mark Dingemanse. 2019. Ideophones (Mimetics, Expressives). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. Mark Aronoff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Akita, Kimi, and Natsuko Tsujimura. 2016. Mimetics. In Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation, ed. Taro Kageyama and Hideki Kishimoto, vol. 3, 133–160. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512097-008.
Assaneo, Maria Florencia, Juan Ignacio Nichols, and Marcos Alberto Trevisan. 2011. The Anatomy of Onomatopoeia. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28317. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028317.
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011a. Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and Iconicity in Siwu. In Semblance and Signification, ed. Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer, and Christina Ljungberg, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://www.mpi.nl/publications/446081.
———. 2011b. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu—Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Nijmegen: Radboud University. https://www.mpi.nl/publications/1005623.
———. 2011c. Ideophones and the Aesthetics of Everyday Language in a West-African Society. The Senses and Society 6 (1): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589311X12893982233830.
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. The Linguistics Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin. https://www.coursehero.com/file/29281284/Fillmore-1982-Frame-Semanticspdf/.
———. 1985. Frames and the Semantics of Understanding. Quaderni Di Semantica 6: 222–254.
Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA38075516.
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John Ohala, eds. 1995a. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001.
———. 1995b. Introduction: Sound-Symbolic Processes. In Sound Symbolism, ed. Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John Ohala, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001.
Hirata, Sachiko, Jun Ukita, and Shinichi Kita. 2011. Implicit Phonetic Symbolism in Voicing of Consonants and Visual Lightness Using Gerner’s Speeded Classification Task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 113 (December): 929–940. https://doi.org/10.2466/15.21.28.PMS.113.6.929-940.
Hosoma, Hiromichi. 2017. Japanese Language Education in Europe. Belfast.
Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. 2006. Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. Munich: LINCOM.
Inoue, Kazuko. 2013. Onomatope No Tagisei to Sōzōsei [Polysemy and Creativity of Onomatopoeia]. In OnomatopeKenkyū No Shatei: ChikazukuOto to Imi [Sound Symbolism and Mimetics: Rethinking the Relationship Between Sound and Meaning in Language], ed. Kazuko Shinohara and Ryoko Uno, 203–216. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
Ivanova, Gergana. 2006. Sound-Symbolic Approach to Japanese Mimetic Words. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 103–114.
Kagitani, Tatsuki, Mao Goto, Junji Watanbe, and Maki Sakamoto. 2014. Sound Symbolic Relationship between Onomatopoeia and Emotional Evaluations in Taste. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36: 2871–2876.
Kenji, Miyazawa, Sarah M. Strong, and Karen Colligan-Taylor. 2002. Masterworks of Miyazawa Kenji – Poems and Fairy Tales. Tokyo: International Foundation for the Promotion of Languages and Culture.
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929. Gestalt Psychology. New York: H. Liveright.
Nasu, Akiko. 2015. The Phonological Lexicon and Mimetic Phonology. In Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, ed. Haruo Kubozono, 253–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Newman, Paul. 2001. Are Ideophones Really as Weird and Extra-Systematic as Linguists Make Them Out to Be? In Ideophones, ed. F.K.E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz, 251–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nuckolls, Janis B. 2010. The Sound-Symbolic Expression of Animacy in Amazonian Ecuador. Diversity 2 (3): 353–369. https://doi.org/10.3390/d2030353.
Oswalt, Robert L. 1995. Inanimate Imitatives in English. In Sound Symbolism, ed. Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John Ohala, 293–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.020.
Ramachandran, V.S., and E.M. Hubbard. 2001. Synaesthesia—A Window Into Perception, Thought and Language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (12): 3–34.
Rhodes, Richard. 1995. Aural Images. In Sound Symbolism, ed. Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John Ohala, 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.019.
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
Shinohara, Kazuko, and Shigeto Kawahara. 2013. Otoshocho No Gengo Fuhensei: “ookisa” No Imeeji o Motoni [Linguistic Universality of Sound Symbolism: Based on the Images of Size]. In OnomatopeKenkyū No Shatei: ChikazukuOto to Imi [Sound Symbolism and Mimetics: Rethinking the Relationship Between Sound and Meaning in Language], 43–57. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
Sugimura, Yasushi. 2017. Nihongo No Onomatope “Hirihiri HiriQ, Hiriri”, “Piripiri, PiriQ, Piriri”, “Biribiri, BiriQ, Biriri” No Kijutsuteki Kenkyu [A Descriptive Study of Japanese Onomatopoeia “Hirihiri HiriQ, Hiriri”, “Piripiri, PiriQ, Piriri”, “Biribiri, BiriQ, Biriri”]. Nagoya Daigaku Gengo Bunka Kenkyukai, Kotoba No Kagaku [Studia Linguistica] 31: 111–130.
Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2001. Revisiting the Two-Dimensional Approach to Mimetics: Reply to Kita (1997). Linguistics 39 (2): 409–418.
Ward, Jamie, and Julia Simner. 2003. Lexical-Gustatory Synaesthesia: Linguistic and Conceptual Factors. Cognition 89 (3): 237–261.
Ward, Jamie, Brett Huckstep, and Elias Tsakanikos. 2006. Sound-Colour Synaesthesia: To What Extent Does It Use Cross-Modal Mechanisms Common to Us All? Cortex 42 (2): 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70352-6.
Wharton, Tim. 2003. Natural Pragmatics and Natural Codes. Mind & Language 18 (5): 447–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00237.
———. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635649.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics 15 (January): 273–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sasamoto, R. (2019). Onomatopoeia and Sound Symbolism. In: Onomatopoeia and Relevance. Palgrave Studies in Sound. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26318-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26318-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26317-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26318-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)