Abstract
Prior to the widespread use of tracers, early forest hydrology studies relied mostly on hydrometric measurements (soil moisture content, groundwater levels, discharge, precipitation inputs). A dominant pre-tracer paradigm was that high precipitation intensities resulted in rapid runoff responses, when infiltration rates were exceeded by precipitation rates, as deduced from hydrometric data. Early hydrologic tracer applications included performing hydrograph separations to understand the fractions of event and pre-event water in streams. Using additional tracers, the end-member mixing analysis model was introduced for quantifying contributions of multiple geographic stormflow sources. With longer series of tracer measurements, more sophisticated inferences became possible, such as transit time distributions and young water fractions. A limitation to the common toolbox of hydrological tracers is that stable isotopes and geochemical tracers do not specifically show surface connectivity, allowing for ambiguity in our understanding of how ‘event water’ actually reaches streams. Furthermore, there are challenges in aggregating these tracer measurements across diverse landscapes to understand larger scale connectivity patterns. Here, we provide a primer on tracer applications in studying the hydrological connections in watersheds and forests. After providing an overview of general basics in tracer applications, we focus on a new type of tracer—terrestrial diatoms—and give some insights into their use for tracing the onset/cessation of surface hydrological connectivity. Given that this is a newly developing tracer method, we demonstrate the process of exploring and testing tracer applications. Furthermore, we discuss the differences among and complementarity between diatoms and more traditional tracers (e.g. solutes).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambroise B (2004) Variable ‘active’ versus ‘contributing’ areas or periods: a necessary distinction. Hydrol Process 18:1149–1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5536
Barron JA, Baldauf JG (1995) Cenozoic marine diatom biostratigraphy and applications to paleoclimatology and paleoceanograhy. In: Blome CD et al (eds) (Convenors) Siliceous microfossils, paleontological society short courses in paleontology, vol 8, pp 107–118
Barthold FK, Tyralla C, Schneider K, Vaché KB, Frede HG, Breuer L (2011) How many tracers do we need for end member mixing analysis (EMMA)? A sensitivity analysis. Water Resour Res 47:W08519. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010604
Benettin P, Velde Y, van der Zee S, Rinaldo A, Botter G (2013) Chloride circulation in a lowland catchment and the formulation of transport by travel time distributions. Water Resour Res 49:4619–4632. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20309
Bonell M, Barnes CJ, Grant CR, Howard A, Burns J (1999) High rainfall, response-dominated catchments: a comparative study of experiments in tropical northeast Queensland with temperate New Zealand. In: Kendall C, JJ MD (eds) Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 347–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81546-0.50018-5
Boulêtreau S, Garabétian F, Sauvage S, Sánchez-Pérez JM (2006) Assessing the importance of a self-generated detachment process in river biofilm models. Freshw Biol 51:901–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01541.x
Bracken L, Croke J (2007) The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrol Process 21:1749–1763. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6313
Burns DA, McDonnell JJ, Hooper RP, Peters NE, Freer JE, Kendall C et al (2001) Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analyses and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA). Hydrol Process 15: 1903–1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.246
Burns DA (2002) Stormflow hydrograph separation based on isotopes: the thrill is gone – what’s next? Hydrol Process 16:1515–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5008
Buttle JM, Peters DL (1997) Inferring hydrological processes in a temperate basin using isotopic a geochemical hydrograph separation: a re-evaluation. Hydrol Process 11:557–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199705)11:6<557::AID-HYP477>3.0.CO;2-Y
Coles AE, Wetzel CE, Martínez-Carreras N, Ector L, McDonnell JJ, Frentress J et al (2016) Diatom as a tracer of hydrological connectivity: are they supply limited? Ecohydrology 9:631–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1662
Coplen TB, Neiman PJ, White AB, Ralph FM (2015) Categorisation of northern California rainfall for periods with and without a radar brightband using stable isotopes and a novel automated precipitation collector. Tellus Ser B Chem Phys Meteorol 67:28574. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28574
De Graaf L, Cammeraat E, Pfister L, Wetzel C, Klaus J, Hissler C (2015) Do diatoms percolate through soil and can they be used for tracing the origin of runoff? EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 2015 17:EGU2015-8961
Desilets SLE, Ferré TPA, Ekwurzel B (2008) Flash flood dynamics and composition in a semiarid mountain watershed. Water Resour Res 44:W12436. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006159
Dunne T, Black RD (1970) Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed. Water Resour Res 6:1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i005p01296
Dunne T, Moore TR, Taylor CH (1975) Recognition and prediction of runoff-producing areas in humid regions. Hydrol Sci Bull 20:305–327
Ector L, Rimet F (2005) Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: an overview. In: Lek S, Scardi M, PFM V, Descy JP, Park YS (eds) Modelling community structure in freshwater ecosystems. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26894-4_2
Fischer BM, van Meerveld HI, Seibert J (2017) Spatial variability in the isotopic composition of rainfall in a small headwater catchment and its effect on hydrograph separation. J Hydrol 547:755–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.045
Foussereau X, Graham WD, Akpoji GA, Destouni G, Rao PSC (2001) Solute transport through a heterogeneous coupled vadose-saturated zone system with temporally random rainfall. Water Resour Res 37:1577–1588. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900389
Freeman MC, Pringle CM, Jackson CR (2007) Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:5–14
Fritz SC, Juggins S, Battarbee RW, Engstrom DR (1991) Reconstruction of past changes in salinity and climate using a diatom-based transfer function. Nature 352:706–708
Harman CJ (2015) Time-variable transit time distributions and transport: theory and application to storage-dependent transport of chloride in a watershed. Water Resour Res 51:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015707
Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR (1967) Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. In: Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds) International symposium on forest hydrology. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 275–290
Hooper RP, Christophersen N, Peters NE (1990) Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soil water end-members – an application to the Panola Mountain catchment, Georgia, USA. J Hydrol 116:321–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90131-G
Horton RE (1933) The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Trans Am Geophys Union 14:446–460. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR014i001p00446
Ingraham NL, Caldwell EA, Verhagen BT (1999) Arid catchments. In: Kendall C, JJ MD (eds) Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81546-0.50020-3
Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (1998) Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam
Kirchner JW, Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C (2010) Comparing chloride and water isotopes as hydrological tracers in two Scottish catchments. Hydrol Process 24:1631–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676
Kirchner JW (2016) Aggregation in environmental systems – part 1: seasonal tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in spatially heterogeneous catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:279–297. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016
Klaus J, McDonnell JJ (2013) Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes: review and evaluation. J Hydrol 505:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.006
Klaus J, Chun KP, McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ (2015a) Temporal dynamics of catchment transit times from stable isotope data. Water Resour Res 51:4208–4223. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016247
Klaus J, Wetzel CE, Martínez-Carreras N, Ector L, Pfister L (2015b) A tracer to bridge the scales: on the value of diatoms for tracing fast flow path connectivity from headwaters to meso-scale catchments. Hydrol Process 29:5275–5289. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10628
Leibundgut C, Malozewski P, Külls C (2009) Tracers in hydrology. Wiley, Chichester
Lobo EA, Heinrich CG, Schuch M, Wetzel CE, Ector L (2016) Diatoms as bioindicators in rivers. In: Neccho O (ed) River algae. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31984-1_11
Maloszewski P, Rauert W, Stichler W, Herrmann A (1983) Application of flow models in an alpine catchment area using tritium and deuterium data. J Hydrol 66:319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90193-2
Maloszewski P, Zuber A (1993) Principles and practice of calibration and validation of mathematical models for the interpretation of environmental tracer data in aquifers. Adv Water Resour 16:173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(93)90036-F
Martínez-Carreras N, Wetzel CE, Frentress J, Ector L, McDonnell JJ, Hoffmann L et al (2015) Hydrological connectivity inferred from diatom transport through the riparian-stream system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19: 3133–3151. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3133-2015
Martínez-Carreras N, Hissler C, Gourdol L, Klaus J, Juilleret J, Iffly JF et al (2016) Storage controls on the generation of double peak hydrographs in a forested headwater catchment. J Hydrol 543:255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.004
McDonnell JJ (1990) A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. Water Resour Res 26:2821–2832. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i011p02821
McDonnell JJ, Sivapalan M, Vaché K, Dunn S, Grant G, Haggerty R et al (2007) Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: a new vision for watershed hydrology. Water Resour Res 43:W07301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005467
McDonnell JJ, McGuire K, Aggarwal P, Beven KJ, Biondi D, Destouni G et al (2010) How old is streamwater? Open questions in catchment transit time conceptualization, modelling and analysis. Hydrol Process 24:1745–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7796
McGlynn BL, McDonnell JJ (2003) Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff. Water Resour Res 39:1310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002091
McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ, Weiler M, Kendall C, McGlynn BL, Welker JM et al (2005) The role of topography on catchment-scale water residence time. Water Resour Res 41:W05002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003657
McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling. J Hydrol 330: 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020
Morgenstern U, Stewart MK, Stenger R (2010) Dating of streamwater using tritium in a post nuclear bomb pulse world: continuous variation of mean transit time with streamflow. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:2289–2301. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010
Pfister L, McDonnell JJ, Wrede S, Hlúbiková D, Matgen P, Fenicia F et al (2009) The rivers are alive: on the potential for diatoms as a tracer of water source and hydrological connectivity. Hydrol Process 23:2841–2845. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7426
Pfister L, Wetzel CE, Klaus J, Martínez-Carreras N, Antonelli M, Teuling A et al (2017) Terrestrial diatoms as tracers in catchment hydrology: a review. WIREs Water 4:e1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1241
Pringle C (2003) The need for a more predictive understanding of hydrologic connectivity. Aquat Conserv 13:467–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.603
Richey DG, McDonnell JJ, Erbe MW, Hurd TM (1998) Hydrograph separations based on chemical and isotopic concentrations: a critical appraisal of published studies from New Zealand, North America and Europe. J Hydrol (NZ) 37:95–111
Rodriguez NB, McGuire KJ, Klaus J (2018) Time-varying storage–water age relationships in a catchment with a Mediterranean climate. Water Resour Res 54:3988–4008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021964
Shukla SK, Mohan R (2012) The contribution of diatoms to worldwide crude oil deposits. In: Gordon R, Seckbach J (eds) The science of algal fuels. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5110-1_20
Sklash MG, Farvolden RN (1979) The role of groundwater in storm runoff. J Hydrol 43:45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90164-1
Smucker NJ, Detenbeck NE, Morrison AC (2013) Diatom responses to watershed development and potential moderating effects of near-stream forest and wetland cover. Freshwater Sci 32:230–249. https://doi.org/10.1899/11-171.1
Soulsby C, Tetzlaff D, Hrachowitz M (2009) Tracers and transit times: windows for viewing catchment scale storage? Hydrol Process 23:3503–3507. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7501
Stewart MK, Mehlhorn J, Elliott S (2007) Hydrometric and natural tracer (oxygen-18, silica, tritium and sulphur hexafluoride) evidence for a dominant groundwater contribution to Pukemanga Stream, New Zealand. Hydrol Process 21:3340–3356. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6557
Stewart MK, Thomas JT (2008) A conceptual model of flow to the Waikoropupu Springs, NW Nelson, New Zealand, based on hydrometric and tracer (18O, Cl, 3H and CFC) evidence. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:1–19. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-1-2008
Stewart MK, Morgenstern U, McDonnell JJ (2010) Truncation of stream residence time: how the use of stable isotopes has skewed our concept of streamwater age and origin. Hydrol Process 24:1646–1659. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7576
Stewart MK, Fahey BD (2010) Runoff generating processes in adjacent tussock grassland and pine plantation catchments as indicated by mean transit time estimation using tritium. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1021-2010
Stoermer EF, Smol JP (2010) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tauro F, Martínez-Carreras N, Barnich F, Juilleret J, Wetzel CE, Ector L et al (2016) Diatom percolation through soils: a proof of concept laboratory experiment. Ecohydrology 9: 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1671
Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, Bacon PJ, Youngson AF, Gibbins C, Malcolm IA (2007) Connectivity between landscapes and riverscapes – a unifying theme in integrating hydrology and ecology in catchment science. Hydrol Process 21:1385–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6701
Uhlenbrook S, Frey M, Leibundgut C, Maloszewski P (2002) Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales. Water Resour Res 38. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000938
Uhlenbrook S, Hoeg S (2003) Quantifying uncertainties in tracer-based hydrograph separations: a case study for two-, three- and five-component hydrograph separations in a mountainous catchment. Hydrol Process 17:431–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1134
Van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J (1994) A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Neth J Aquat Ecol 28:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334251
Wrede S, Fenicia F, Martínez-Carreras N, Juilleret J, Hissler C, Krein A et al (2015) Towards more systematic perceptual model development: a case study using 3 Luxembourgish catchments. Hydrol Process 29:2731–2750. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10393
Wu N, Faber C, Sun X, Qu Y, Wang C, Ivetic S et al (2016) Importance of sampling frequency when collecting diatoms. Sci Rep 6:36950. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36950
Wu N, Faber C, Ulrich U, Fohrer N (2018) Diatoms as an indicator for tile drainage flow in a German lowland catchment. Environ Sci Eur 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0133-5
Acknowledgements
Research on the potential for terrestrial diatoms to serve as hydrological tracers has been funded through the National Research Fund of Luxembourg (Grants C09/SR/14—BIGSTREAM & C12/SR/4018854—ECSTREAM). The authors would like to acknowledge Jeffrey J. McDonnell for providing comments on an earlier version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfister, L., Allen, S.T., Wetzel, C.E., Martínez-Carreras, N. (2020). On Complementing the Tracer Toolbox for Quantifying Hydrological Connectivity: Insights Gained from Terrestrial Diatom Tracer Experiments. In: Levia, D.F., Carlyle-Moses, D.E., Iida, S., Michalzik, B., Nanko, K., Tischer, A. (eds) Forest-Water Interactions. Ecological Studies, vol 240. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26086-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26086-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26085-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26086-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)