Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Iran in Perspective

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

  • 280 Accesses

Abstract

Three years have passed since the publication of Iran Revisited, and, in the present study, I retract nothing from my initial thought that members of a community, people, are all responsible for their own welfare as well as the wellbeing of the community. In this context, people are perceived not as a collection of individuals with various interests, but as a collective enterprise intended to co-exist and share common objectives. If I erred, it is due to my conviction that people hold the power to change their circumstances and elevate themselves above an existing condition. Conversely, to refute this belief means to defy a human community and ascertain that men are nothing more than passive and submissive agencies that left the cave and landed on the moon by fortunes and pure coincidences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Part of the problem with these sorts of standard categorizations in Iran is due to the fact that terms in use are either misunderstood or incorrectly understood. For instance, a well-known narrative describes that Cossack Brigade marched on Tehran on February 22, 1921 was a coup d’état organized by Cossack commander Reza Khan and his associate Sayyid Zia-ud-Din Tabatabai, who later became Prime Minister for a short period. By definition, however, coup d’état means the overthrow of an existing government, but the King, Ahmed Shah, was left undisturbed on the throne even after February 22, 1921. Only in 1925, the Majlis proclaimed the disposition of the Ahmad Shah, to which he made no attempt to defend his throne and left the country. For details, see Faridul Haq (1968), pp. 4.

References

  • Faridul Haq M (1968) The constitution of Iran in its historical setting. Pak Horiz 21(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1962) Civilization and its discontents. (trans: Strachey J. W. W. Norton)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AD (2007) Body politics: political metaphor and political violence. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pirzadeh, A. (2019). Concluding Remarks. In: Modern Iran in Perspective. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25708-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics