Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Current Concepts in Ophthalmology pp 1–33Cite as

Updates in Refractive Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 795 Accesses

Abstract

An improved understanding of ammetropia and its effect on visual quality have led to the latest developments in refractive surgery. Eyedrops for presbyopia target the crystalline lens to improve accommodation. Corneal inlays alter the curvature of the cornea to enhance vision at all distances. Diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses—which aim light at several discrete foci—and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses—which aim light in a continuous plane—improve vision at all distances. Accommodating intraocular lenses change power with accommodative effort. Corneal refractive surgeries like PRK and LASIK have been joined by Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)—an all femtosecond laser flapless procedure. Phakic intraocular lens implantation is indicated for a wider range of refractive errors than corneal refractive procedures. These techniques allow for safer and more effective correction of refractive errors, and adequate monitoring of visual quality at all distances for new refractive surgery techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Renna A, Alió J, Vejarano L. Pharmacological treatments of presbyopia: a review of modern perspectives. Eye Vis. 2017;4:3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krader C, Feinbaum C. Simple solution for presbyopia: topical agent acts by reducing pupil size to increase depth of focus. Ophthalmology Times. http://www.ophthalmologytimes.com/modern-medicine-feature-articles/simple-solution-presbyopia. Published 2015. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.

  3. Patel S, Salamun F, Matovic K. Pharmacological correction of presbyopia. In: Poster Presentation European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Congress XXXI. http://www.escrs.org/amsterdam2013/programme/posters-details.asp?id=19804. Published 2013. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  4. Renna A, Vejarano L, De la Cruz E, Alió J. Pharmacological treatment of presbyopia by novel binocularly instilled eye drops: a pilot study. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2016;5:63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cole J. Can an eye drop eliminate presbyopia? Rev Optom. https://www.reviewofoptometry.com/article/ro0617-can-an-eye-drop-eliminate-presbyopia. Published 2017. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.

  6. Tsuneyoshi Y, Higuchi A, Negishi K, Tsubota K. Suppression of presbyopia progression with pirenoxine eyedrops: experiments on rats and non-blinded, randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6819.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Krader C. Topical drops show promise as treatment for presbyopia. Ophthalmol Times Eur. 2016;12(6):18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garza E, Gomez S, Chayet A, Dishler J. One-year safety and efficacy results of a hydrogel inlay to improve near vision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:166–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Konstantopoulos A, Mehta J. Surgical compensation of presbyopia with corneal inlays. Expert Rev. 2015;12(3):341–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulet M, Alió J, Knorz M. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1455–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alió J, Shabayek M, Montes-Mico R, Mulet M, Ahmed A, Merayo J. Intracorneal hydrogel lenses and corneal aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:247–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindstrom R, Macrae S, Pepose J, Hoopes P. Corneal inlays for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:281–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arlt E, Krall E, Moussa S, Grabner G, Dexl A. Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia : the evidence to date. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:129–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitman J, Dougherty P, Parkhurst G, et al. Treatment of presbyopia in emmetropes using a shape-changing corneal inlay: one-year clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:466–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Malandrini A, Martone G, Menabuoni L, et al. Bifocal refractive corneal inlay implantation to improve near vision in emmetropic presbyopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1962–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Limnopoulou A, Bouzoukis D, Kymionis G, et al. Visual outcomes and safety of a refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia using femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(1):12–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alió J, Plaza-Puche A, Montalban R, Javaloy J. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:978–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baily C, Kohnen T, Keefe M. Preloaded refractive-addition corneal inlay to compensate for presbyopia implanted using a femtosecond laser: one-year visual outcomes and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1341–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Naroo S, Bilkhu S. Clinical utility of the KAMRA corneal inlay. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:913–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita M, Kanamori T, Waring G, et al. Simultaneous corneal inlay implantation and laser in situ keratomileusis for presbyopia in patients with hyperopia, myopia, or emmetropia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:495–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomita M, Kanamori T, Waring G, Nakamura T, Yukawa S. Small-aperture corneal inlay implantation to treat presbyopia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:898–905.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Igras E, Caoimh R, Paul O, William P. Long-term results of combined LASIK and monocular small-aperture corneal inlay implantation. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(6):379–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huseynova T, Kanamori T, Waring G, Tomita M. Outcomes of small aperture corneal inlay implantation in patients with pseudophakia. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(2):110–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin L, Vilupuru S, Pepose J. Contrast sensitivity in patients with emmetropic presbyopia before and after small-aperture inlay implantation. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:386–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alió J, Abbouda A, Huseynli S, Knorz M, Homs M, Durrie D. Removability of a small aperture intracorneal inlay for presbyopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(8):550–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dexl A, Seyeddain O, Riha W, Hohensinn M, Hitzl W, Grabner G. Reading performance after implantation of a small-aperture corneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia:two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:525–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gooi P, Ahmed I. Review of presbyopic IOLs: multifocal and accommodating IOLs. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52(2):41–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohnen T. Multifocal IOL technology: a successful step on the journey toward presbyopia treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosen E, Alió J, Dick H, Dell S, Slade S. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: meta-analysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:310–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Davison J, Simpson M. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):849–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Duran-Garcia M, Multifocal Intraocular Lenses AJ. Types and models. In: Alió J, Pikkel J, editors. Multifocal intraocular lenses. The art and the practice. 1st ed. London: Springer Healthcare; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alió J, Plaza-Puche A, Javaloy J, et al. Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:555–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alió J, Plaza-Puche A, Javaloy J, Ayala M. Comparison of the visual and intraocular optical performance of a refractive multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry and an apodized diffractive multifocal IOL. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:100–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McNeely R, Pazo E, Spence A, et al. Comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision with combined symmetrical inferonasal near addition versus inferonasal and superotemporal placement of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1721–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rocha K. Extended depth of focus IOLs: the next chapter in refractive technology? J Refract Surg. 2017;33(3):46.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Breyer D, Kaymak H, Ax T, Kretz F, Auffarth G, Hagen P. Multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6:339–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Beiko G. Status of accommodative intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(1):74–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu J-P, Zhang F, Zhao J-Y, Ma L-W, Zhang J-S. Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(5):690–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosen E, Alió J, Dick H, Dell S, Slade S. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:310–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:579–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sachdev G, Sachdev M. Optimizing outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:1294–300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Aliò J, Plaza-Puche A, Férnandez-Buenaga R, Pikkel J, Maldonado M. Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:611–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Shimizu K, Negishi K, Sato M, Bissen-Miyajima H. Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:215.220.e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lichtinger A, Rootman D. Intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction: past, present and future. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(1):40–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Prieto J, Bautista M. Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1508–16.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Akella S, Juthani V. Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:318–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. MacRae S, Holladay J, Glasser A, et al. Special report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force consensus statement for extended depth of field intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:139–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Balducci N, Barboni P. Visual performance of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens compared to a distance-dominant diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(4):228–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Domínguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada J, Del Águila-Carrasco A, Monsálvez-Romin D, Montés-Micó R. In vitro optical quality comparison of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 progressive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):138–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bellucci R, Curatolo M. A new extended depth of focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(6):389–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Savini G, Balducci N, Carbonara C, et al. Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens. Eye. 2019;33:404–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pepose J, Burke J, Qazi M. Accommodating intraocular lenses. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6:350–7.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Siatiri H, Mohammadpour M, Gholami A, Ashrafi E, Siatiri N, Mirshahi R. Optical aberrations, accommodation, and visual quality with a bioanalogic continuous focus intraocular lens after cataract surgery. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;29(4):274–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim Y, Kang K, Yeo Y, Kim K, Siringo F. Consistent pattern in positional instability of polyfocal full-optic accommodative IOL. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(6):1299–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Srinivasan S. Small aperture intraocular lenses: the new kids on the block. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(8):927–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dick H, Elling M, Schultz T. Binocular and monocular implantation of small-aperture intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(9):629–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dick H, Pioevella M, Vukich J. Prospective multicenter trial of a small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:956–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ang R. Small-aperture intraocular lens tolerance to induced astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1659–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Schultz T, Dick H. Small-aperture intraocular lens implantation in a patient with an irregular cornea. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):706–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Trindade C, Trindade B, Trindade F, Werner L, Osher R, Santhiago M. New pinhole sulcus implant for the correction of irregular corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(10):1297–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. De Vries N, Webers C, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nujits R. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00D or +4.00D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1316–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Alió J, Piñero D, Plaza-Puche A, et al. Visual and optical performance with two different diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses compared to a monofocal lens. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:570–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cochener B, Boutillier G, Lamard M, Auberger-Zagnoli C. A comparative evaluation of a new generation of diffractive trifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(8):507–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Carson D, Xu Z, Alexander E, Choi M, Zhao Z, Hong X. Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1361–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee S, Choi M, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Alexander E, Liu Y. Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1031–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengózar-Vela A, Ruiz-Santos M. A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(2):182–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. García-Pérez J, Gros-Otero J, Sánchez-Ramos C, Blázquez V, Contreras I. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0462-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lawless M, Hodge C, Reich J, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes following implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Eye Vis. 2017;4(4):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-017-0076-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Akondi V, Pérez-Merino P, Martinez-Enriquez E, et al. Evaluation of the true wavefront aberrations in eyes implanted with a rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):257–65.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Plaza-Puche A, Alió J, MacRae S, Zheleznyak L, Sala E, Yoon G. Correlating optical bench performance with clinical defocus curves in varifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(5):300–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Veliká V, Hejsek L, Raiskup F. Clinical results of implantation of two types of multifocal rotationally-asymmetric intraocular lenses. Čes a slov Oftal. 2017;73(1):3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Aliò J, Piñero D, Plaza-Puche A, Chan M. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:241–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cochener B, Group CS. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: International Multicenter Concerto Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1268–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gatinel D, Loicq J. Clinically relevant optical properties of bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(4):273–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yoo Y-S, Whang W, Byun Y, et al. Through-focus optical bench performance of extended depth-of-focus and bifocal intraocular lenses compared to a monofocal lens. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(4):236–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Camps V, Tolosa A, Piñero D, de Fez D, Caballero M, Miret J. In vitro aberrometric assessment of a multifocal intraocular lens and two extended depth of focus IOLs. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:7095734.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Escandón-García S, Ribeiro F, McAlinden C, Queirós A, González-Méijome MJ. Through-focus vision performance and light disturbances of 3 new intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:6165493. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Hayashi K, et al. A multicenter prospective cohort study on refractive surgery in 15,011 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:159–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Werner L, Olson R, Mamalis N. New technology IOL optics. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19:469–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Alió J, Piñero D, Plaza-Puche A. Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1656–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Alió J, Plaza-Puche A, Montalban R, Ortega P. Near visual outcomes with single optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1568–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Liang Y-L, Jia S-B. Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(6):1028–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Kramer G, Werner L, Neuhann T, Tetz M, Mamalis N. Anterior haptic flexing and in-the-bag subluxation of an accommodating intraocular lens due to excessive capsular bag contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2010–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Page T, Whitman J. A stepwise approach for the management of capsular contraction syndrome in hinge-based accommodative intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1039–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Jardim D, Soloway B, Starr C. Asymmetric vault of an accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(2):347–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Menapace R, Findl O, Kriechbaum K. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:473–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Saiki M, Negishi K, Dogru M, Yamaguchi T, Tsubota K. Biconvex posterior chamber accommodating intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery: long-term outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:603–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wolffsohn J, Davies L, Gupta N, et al. Mechanism of action of the tetraflex accommodative intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:858–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Cleary G, Spalton D, Gala K. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(5):619–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Nguyen N, Sietz B, Reese S, Langenbucher A, Küchle M. Accommodation after Nd:YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens 1CU. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(2):120–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bohórquez V, Alarcon R. Long-term reading performance in patients with bilateral dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1880–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Peris-Martínez C, Díez-Ajenjo A, García-Domene C. Short-term results with the Synchrony lens implant for correction of presbyopia following cataract surgery. J Emmetropia. 2013;4:137–43.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ale J, Manns F, Ho A. Magnifications of single and dual element accommodative intraocular lenses: paraxial optics analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(1):7–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kohl J, Werner L, Ford J, et al. Long-term uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a new accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:2113–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Alió J, Ben-nun J, Rodríguez-Prats J, Plaza-Puche A. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1671–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Alió J, Simonov A, Plaza-Puche A, et al. Visual outcomes and accommodative response of the lumina accommodative intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:37–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Sheppard A, Bashir A, Wolffsohn J, Davies L. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93(6):441–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Boyd B, Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A. Lasik and beyond Lasik: wavefront analysis and customized ablation. Highlights of Ophthalmology Int’l: Panama; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Manche E, Haw W. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011;109:201–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Vestergaard A. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92 Thesis(2):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Vestergaard A, Hjortdal J, Ivarsen A, Work K, Grauslund J, Sjølie A. Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy for low to high myopia: 13 to 19 years of follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(5):312–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Spadea L, Sabetti L, D’Alessandri L, Balestrazzi E. Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK for the correction of hyperopia: 2-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:131–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Reinstein D, Archer T, Gobbe M. The history of LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(4):291–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Hayashi K, et al. A multicenter retrospective survey of refractive surgery in 78,248 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):598–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Hersh P, Brint S, Maloney R, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: a randomized protective study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1512–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Torky M, Al Zafiri Y, Khattab A, Farag R, Awad E. Visumax femtolasik versus Moria M2 microkeratome in mild to moderate myopia: efficacy, safety, predictability, aberrometri changes and flap thickness predictability. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0520-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Aristeidou A, Taniguchi E, Tsatsos M, et al. The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis. 2015;2:12.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ikeda T, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kasahara S, Kamiya K. Twelve-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9391436. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9391436

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Frings A, Richard G, Steinberg J, Druchkiv V, Linke S, Katz T. LASIK and PRK in hyperopic astigmatic eyes: is early retreatment advisable? Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:565–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Jaycock P, O’Brart D, Rajan M, Marshall J. 5-year follow-up of LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(2):191–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Wolle M, Randleman J, Woodward M. Complications of refractive surgery: ectasia after refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2016;56(2):129–41.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Sajjadi V, Ghoreishi M, Jafarzadehpour E. Refractive and aberration outcomes after customized photorefractive keratectomy in comparison with customized femtosecond laser. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2015;4(4):136–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Reinstein D, Carp G, Archer T, et al. In: Reinstein D, Carp G, Archer T, editors. The Surgeon’s Guide to SMILE: small incision lenticule extraction. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Reinstein D, Archer T, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis. 2014;1:3.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(9):1513–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(5):837–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Vestergard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2003–10.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Kataoka T, Nishida T, Murata A, et al. Control-matched comparison of refractive and visual outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:865–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Han T, Xu Y, Han X, et al. Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:565–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Titiyal J, Kaur M, Rathi A, Falera R, Chaniyara M, Sharma N. Learning curve of small incision lenticule extraction: challenges and complications. Cornea. 2017;36(11):1377–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Krueger R, Meister C. A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):292–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Liu Y, Teo E, Ang H, et al. Biological corneal inlay for presbyopia derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Sci Rep. 2018;8:1831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20267-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Jacob S, Kumar D, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Aravind R, Saijimol A. Preliminary evidence of successful near vision enhancement with a new technique: PrEsbyopic Allogenic Refractive Lenticule (PEARL) corneal inlay using a SMILE lenticule. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):224–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Titiyal J, Shaikh F, Kaur M, Rathi A. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1685–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Huang D, Schallhorn S, Sugar A, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2244–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Alió J, Mulet M. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1368–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Baïkoff G, Matach G, Fontaine A, Ferraz C, Spera C. Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(7):1454–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Alió J, Toffaha B, Peña-Garcia P, Sádaba L, Barraquer R. Phakic intraocular lens explantation: causes in 240 cases. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(1):30–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Aerts A, Jonker S, Wielders L, et al. Phakic intraocular lens: two-year results and comparison of endothelial cell loss with iris-fixated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2258–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Ferreira T, Portelinha J. Endothelial distance after phakic iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation: a new safety reference. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:225–61.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Alió J, Abbouda A, Peña-Garcia P. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of long-term phakic angle-supported intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):894–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Rosman M, Alió J, Ortiz D, Pérez-Santonja J. Refractive stability of LASIK with the VISX 20/20 excimer laser vs ZB5M phakic IOL implantation in patients with high myopia (>−10.00D): a 10-year retrospective study. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(4):279–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Alió J, De la Hoz F, Pérez-Santonja J, Ruiz-Moreno J, Quesada J. Phakic anterior chamber lenses for the correction of myopia: a 7-year cumulative analysis of complications in 263 cases. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:458–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Gimbel H, Norton N, Amritanand A. Angle-supported phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of myopia: three-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2179–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Qasem Q, Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. 5-year prospective follow-up of Artisan phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(5):283–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Karimian F, Baradaran-Rafii A, Hashemian S, et al. Comparison of three phakic intraocular lenses for correction of myopia. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9(4):427–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Sedaghat M, Ansari-Astaneh M, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Davis S, Sikder S. Artisan iris-supported phakic IOL implantation in patients with keratoconus: a review of 16 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(7):489–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Dick H, Budo C, Malecaze F, et al. Foldable Artiflex phakic intraocular lens for the correction of myopia: two-year follow-up results of a prospective European multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):671–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Ozertürk Y, Kuboaglu A, Sari E, et al. Foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: two years of follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(1):23–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Stulting R, Group UVS. Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation: results of the United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):464–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Simões P, Ferreira T. Iris-fixated intraocular lenses for ametropia and aphakia. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2014;3(4):116–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Davidorf J, Zaldivar R, Oscherow S. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia of +4 to +11 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(3):306–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Dougherty P, Taylor T. Refractive outcomes and safety of the implantable collamer lens in young low-to-moderate myopes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:273–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;0:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1135/bjophthalmol-2017-310164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Pesando P, Ghiringhello M, Tagliavacche P. Posterior chamber collamer phakic intraocular lens for myopia and hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 1999;15(4):415–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Matsumura K, Komatsu M, Shimizu K. Long-term quality of life after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:2019–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Asgari S. Comparison of the visual outcomes between PRK-MMC and phakic IOL implantation in high myopic patients. Eye. 2014;28:1113–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Hassaballa M, Macky T. Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs Visian ICL. Eye. 2011;25(10):1365–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Ben-nun J. The NuLens Accommodating Intraocular Lens. Ophthalmol Clinic North Am. 2006;19:129–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vissum, Alicante, Spain

    M. Joan T. D. Balgos & Jorge L. Alió

  2. Division of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain

    Jorge L. Alió

Authors
  1. M. Joan T. D. Balgos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge L. Alió
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge L. Alió .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Poznan, Poland

    Andrzej Grzybowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balgos, M.J.T.D., Alió, J.L. (2020). Updates in Refractive Surgery. In: Grzybowski, A. (eds) Current Concepts in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25389-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25389-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25388-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25389-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation