Skip to main content

An Augmented Reality Environment to Provide Visual Feedback to Amputees During sEMG Data Acquisitions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11650))

Abstract

Myoelectric hand prostheses have the potential to improve the quality of life of hand amputees. Still, the rejection rate of functional prostheses in the adult population is high. One of the causes is the long time for fitting the prosthesis and the lack of feedback during training. Moreover, prosthesis control is often unnatural and requires mental effort during the training. Virtual and augmented reality devices can help to improve these difficulties and reduce phantom limb pain. Amputees can start training the residual limb muscles with a weightless virtual hand earlier than possible with a real prosthesis. When activating the muscles related to a specific grasp, the subjects receive a visual feedback from the virtual hand. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents one of the first portable augmented reality environment for transradial amputees that combines two devices available on the market: the Microsoft HoloLens and the Thalmic labs Myo. In the augmented environment, rendered by the HoloLens, the user can control a virtual hand with surface electromyography. By using the virtual hand, the user can move objects in augmented reality and train to activate the right muscles for each movement through visual feedback. The environment presented represents a resource for rehabilitation and for scientists. It helps hand amputees to train using prosthetic hands right after the surgery. Scientists can use the environment to develop real time control experiments, without the logistical disadvantages related to dealing with a real prosthetic hand but with the advantages of a realistic visual feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example http://www.coaptengineering.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.myo.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/.

  4. 4.

    https://unity3d.com/.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/rondagdag/hololens-littlebits/.

  6. 6.

    https://bitbucket.org/AngryBurritoCoder/.

References

  1. Anderson, F., Bischof, W.F.: Augmented reality improves myoelectric prosthesis training. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 13(3), 349–354 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atzori, M., et al.: Clinical parameter effect on the capability to control myoelectric robotic prosthetic hands. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 53(3), 345–358 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atzori, M., Gijsberts, A., Müller, H., Caputo, B.: Classification of hand movements in amputated subjects by semg and accelerometers. In: 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3545–3549. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atzori, M., Müller, H.: Control capabilities of myoelectric robotic prostheses by hand amputees: a scientific research and market overview. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 162 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biddiss, E.A., Chau, T.T.: Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31(3), 236–257 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bullock, I.M., Zheng, J.Z., De La Rosa, S., Guertler, C., Dollar, A.M.: Grasp frequency and usage in daily household and machine shop tasks. IEEE Trans. Haptics 6(3), 296–308 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castellini, C., Gruppioni, E., Davalli, A., Sandini, G.: Fine detection of grasp force and posture by amputees via surface electromyography. J. Physiol.-Paris 103(3–5), 255–262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cipriani, C., et al.: Online myoelectric control of a dexterous hand prosthesis by transradial amputees. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 19(3), 260–270 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cognolato, M., et al.: Hand gesture classification in transradial amputees using the Myo armband classifier. In: 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), pp. 156–161. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson, J.: A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J. Hand Ther. 15(1), 62–70 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupont, A.C., Morin, E.L.: A myoelectric control evaluation and trainer system. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 2(2), 100–107 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farina, D., et al.: The extraction of neural information from the surface emg for the control of upper-limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22(4), 797–809 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jang, C.H., et al.: A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 35(6), 907–921 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuttuva, M., Burdea, G., Flint, J., Craelius, W.: Manipulation practice for upper-limb amputees using virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 14(2), 175–182 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamounier, E., Lopes, K., Cardoso, A., Andrade, A., Soares, A.: On the use of virtual and augmented reality for upper limb prostheses training and simulation. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 2451–2454. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mendez, I., et al.: Evaluation of the Myo armband for the classification of hand motions. In: 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 1211–1214. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ortiz-Catalan, M., et al.: Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for phantom limb pain: a single group, clinical trial in patients with chronic intractable phantom limb pain. Lancet 388(10062), 2885–2894 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palermo, F., Cognolato, M., Gijsberts, A., Müller, H., Caputo, B., Atzori, M.: Repeatability of grasp recognition for robotic hand prosthesis control based on sEMG data, pp. 1154–1159 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peerdeman, B., et al.: Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(6), 719–738 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pizzolato, S., Tagliapietra, L., Cognolato, M., Reggiani, M., Müller, H., Atzori, M.: Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks. PloS one 12(10), e0186132 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roeschlein, R., Domholdt, E.: Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 13(1), 14–18 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silcox, D.H., Rooks, M.D., Vogel, R.R., Fleming, L.L.: Myoelectric prostheses. a long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. JBJS 75(12), 1781–1789 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soares, A., Andrade, A., Lamounier, E., Carrijo, R.: The development of a virtual myoelectric prosthesis controlled by an emg pattern recognition system based on neural networks. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 127–141 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takeuchi, T., Wada, T., Mukobaru, M., Doi, S.: A training system for myoelectric prosthetic hand in virtual environment. In: IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, CME 2007, pp. 1351–1356. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ziegler-Graham, K., MacKenzie, E.J., Ephraim, P.L., Travison, T.G., Brookmeyer, R.: Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the united states: 2005 to 2050. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89(3), 422–429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Palermo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Palermo, F., Cognolato, M., Eggel, I., Atzori, M., Müller, H. (2019). An Augmented Reality Environment to Provide Visual Feedback to Amputees During sEMG Data Acquisitions. In: Althoefer, K., Konstantinova, J., Zhang, K. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11650. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25332-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25332-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25331-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25332-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics