Skip to main content

“Nested Interculturality”: Dispositions and Practices for Navigating Tensions in Immersion Experiences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Redefining Teaching Competence through Immersive Programs

Abstract

This chapter explores the model of “nested interculturality” (Avineri, 2015), a collective of dispositions and practices for ethical intercultural engagement that can be used to navigate tensions often experienced in cultural and linguistic immersion experiences. The conceptualization of “nests” foregrounds an ecological and dynamic view of interculturality in which both cultivation/growth and precariousness/risk are negotiated simultaneously in partnership with others. The chapter explores interculturality as an individual-in-context learning process and an “oppositional practice” (Kramsch & Nolden, 1994) negotiated through interactions across spaces, temporalities, and narratives. Ultimately, this chapter is both theoretical and model-building as well as pedagogical and practice-oriented, highlighting how interculturally-minded and relationally-oriented educators can mobilize their professional practice for societal change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In workshops and courses in which I introduce “nested interculturality” I first ask the students/participants to share their associations with the word “nest”, which invites them to consider both the positive and negative aspects of the term. I also show a short video in which a bird is sitting on branches and there is a second bird struggling underneath the branches. Though at first they are not able to see the second bird, eventually they are able to. I then highlight how interculturality is about “seeing the second bird” (i.e., noticing and acknowledging what may be at first be invisible or marginalized, and thoughtfully engaging with it).

  2. 2.

    http://www.servicelearning.umn.edu/crimson/dependancies/multimedia/reflection1.pdf.

  3. 3.

    http://www.servicelearning.umn.edu/info/reflection.html.

  4. 4.

    http://servicelearning.duke.edu/uploads/media_items/dealreflection-questions.original.pdf.

  5. 5.

    This needs assessment tool is adapted from Peter Shaw’s Curriculum Design needs assessment tool.

References

  • Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development,48(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antal, A. B., & Friedman, V. J. (2008). Learning to negotiate reality: A strategy for teaching intercultural competencies. Journal of Management Education,32(3), 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arao, B., & Clemens, K. (2013). From safe spaces to brave spaces: A new way to frame dialogue around diversity and social justice. In L. M. Landreman (Ed.), The art of effective facilitation: Reflections from social justice educators (pp. 135–150). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arieli, D., Friedman, V. J., & Agbaria, K. (2009). The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research,7(3), 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N. (2015). Nested interculturality, multiple knowledges, and situated identities through service-learning in language education. In J. M. Perren & A. J. Wurr (Eds.), Learning the language of global citizenship: Strengthening service-learning in TESOL. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N. (2017). Research methods for language teaching: Inquiry, process, and synthesis. London, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N. (2019). The ‘heritage narratives’ of yiddish metalinguistic community members. In E. Falconi & K. Graber (Eds.), Storytelling and narrative practice: Ethnographic approaches to the tales we tell. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N., Graham, L. R., Johnson, E. J., Riner, R. C., & Rosa, J. (Eds.). (2018). Language and social justice in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N., & Perley, B. C. (2018). Mascots, name calling, and racial slurs: Seeking social justice through audience coalescence. In N. Avineri, L. R. Graham, E. J. Johnson, R. C. Riner, & J. Rosa (Eds.), Language and social justice in practice (pp. 147–156). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, N., & Perren, J. (in press). Language testing in service-learning: A critical approach to socially-situated language-in-use. In S.-A. Mirhosseini & P. DeCosta (Eds.), The sociopolitics of English language testing. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, R. (2004). A world of others’ words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. A. (2007). Theoretical frameworks for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook (pp. 3–15). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury-Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest? Action Research,8(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interviewer in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. C., Clayton, P. H., & Price, M. (2009). Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service-Learning and Civic Engagement, 1(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus-community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues,58(3), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist,32(7), 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M. (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Substandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,11(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butin, D. (2010). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, A. F., Guido-DiBrito, F., & Mallory, S. L. (2003). Learning to value the “other”: A framework of individual diversity development. Journal of College Student Development,44(4), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. H., Bringle, R. G., Senor, B., Huq, J., & Morrison, M. (2010). Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitative, transactional, or transformational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,16(2), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook for leaders of change (2nd ed.). Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum,1989, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education,10(3), 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (Ed.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCosta, P. I. (Ed.). (2015). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2011). Introduction: Interviews vs. ‘natural’ contexts: A false dilemma. Language in Society,40, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, F. (2011). A plea for change in research on intercultural discourses: A ‘liquid’ approach to the study of the acculturation of Chinese students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses,6(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, Santos B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeStigter, T. (1999). Public displays of affection: Political community through critical empathy. Research in the Teaching of English,33(3), 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, B. (2004). Action research literature: Themes and trends. Action Research,2(4), 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S., & Giles, D. E., Jr. (2004). Service-learning partnerships: Paths of engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,11, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, M. A. (1996). A nested theory of conflict. A Leadership Journal: Women in Leadership,1, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (1996). A practitioner’s guide to reflection in service learning. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconi, E., & Graber, K. (Eds.). (2019). Storytelling and narrative practice: Ethnographic approaches to the tales we tell. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, V. (2014). Negotiating reality: Intercultural communication as constructing social space. In S. Poutiainen (Ed.), Theoretical turbulence in intercultural communication studies (pp. 9–25). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education,19(6), 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,27(4), 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B. A. (2001). A comprehensive model for assessing service-learning and community-university partnerships. New Directions for Higher Education,2001(114), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, Z. (2018). Exploring intercultural communication: Language in action (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, B., & Associates (Eds.). (2003). Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, J., Clayton, P., & Jaeger, A. (2010). Community engaged scholarship as mutually transformative partnerships. In L. M. Harter, J. Hamel-Lambert, & J. L. Millesen (Eds.), Participatory partnerships for social action and research (pp. 259–277). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke, E. M. (2008). Shared partnership identity between faculty and community partners (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (Order No. 3336046).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. G. (2001). Privilege, power, and difference. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C., & Nolden, T. (1994). Redefining literacy in a foreign language. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 27(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). The ideology of interculturality in Japanese language-in-education policy. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 20.1–20.16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., Pirbhai-Illich, F., & Pete, S. (2017). Beyond culturally responsive pedagogy: Decolonizing teacher education. In F. Pirbhai-Illich, S. Pete, & F. Martin (Eds.), Culturally responsive pedagogy (pp. 235–255). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(2), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, K., & Condon, J. (2010). The DIE is cast: The continuing evolution of intercultural communication’s favorite classroom exercise. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,34(1), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nero, S. (2009). Inhabiting the other’s world: Language and cultural immersion for US-based teachers in the Dominican Republic. Language, Culture, and Curriculum,22(3), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neururer, J., & Rhoads, R. A. (1998). Alternative spring breaking: Learning through community service. NASPA Journal,35(2), 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (Eds.). (2010). Language and culture: Reflective narratives and the emergence of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, J. (2017). Safe spaces, brave spaces: Diversity and free expression in education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. K., & Menard-Warwick, J. (2012). Short-term study abroad for Texas preservice teachers: On the road from empathy to critical awareness. Multicultural Education, 19(3), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2017). Posthumanist applied linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2013). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remen, R. (1996). Helping, fixing or serving? [PDF file]. Retreived from https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/honors/docs/communityengagement/HelpingFixingServing.pdf.

  • Reyes Cruz, M. (2008). What if I just cite Graciela? Working toward decolonizing knowledge through a critical ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry,14(4), 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, D. L., & Knarr, L. (2013). Building awareness of dispositions: Enhancing moral sensibilities in teaching. Journal of Moral Education,42(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R., Tryon, E. A., & Hilgendorf, A. (Eds.). (2009). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (2008). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J. (Ed.). (2000). Benchmarks for campus/community partnerships. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, D. (2012). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, N. (2013). Salt. New York, NY: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling Neal, J., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development,22(4), 722–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. G., & Areepattamannil, S. (Eds.). (2016). Dispositions in teacher education: A global perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction [PDF document]. Retrieved From https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/11736/A%20brief%20introduction%20to%20CoP.pdf?sequence%E2%80%B0=%E2%80%B01.

  • Wicks, P. G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research,7(3), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. (2008). Morality: An anthropological perspective. New York, NY: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Avineri, N. (2019). “Nested Interculturality”: Dispositions and Practices for Navigating Tensions in Immersion Experiences. In: Martin, D., Smolcic, E. (eds) Redefining Teaching Competence through Immersive Programs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24788-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24788-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24787-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24788-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics