Skip to main content

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

Increased prosthetic ankle surgeries have led to a corresponding increase in prosthetic revision surgeries. It is important first to identify the appropriate candidates on whom to perform a revision and implant a new prosthesis. A thorough physical examination allows us to identify a malalignment of the hindfoot or tibia in different planes, which will need to be corrected with additional surgeries during the revision. Imaging tests identify the cause of the prosthetic failure, which in most cases is due to loosening with or without subsidence of the talar component. A CT scan can assess the bone stock deficit (a fundamental aspect in deciding on the prosthetic model to be implanted), the need for autograft/cancellous or structural allograft, and the performance of other complementary surgeries. The surgical technique does not differ much from revision surgery of the knee or hip prosthesis, but it is crucial that it be performed by a surgeon experienced in prosthetic ankle surgery. Most important is to perform an extensive debridement of the fibrous tissues and a posterior capsulotomy, then send intraoperative samples to microbiology to rule out an infectious process, and be thorough in extracting the components, avoiding excessive bone loss. When there is suspicion or a clear diagnosis of prosthetic infection, the implantation of a new prosthesis can also be considered, provided that a series of circumstances are met: identifying the pathogenic agent to establish a specific antibiotic treatment, debriding and removing prosthetic implants, and only performing a new arthroplasty if the clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters have normalized after 6–8 weeks of antibiotic treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. 257 Ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 y 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:575–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Henricson A, Nilsson JA, Carlsson A. 10-Year survival of total ankle arthroplasties: a report on 780 cases form the Swedish Ankle Register. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:655–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:569–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prissel MA, Troukis TS. Incidence of revision after primary implantation of the Scandinavian Total ankle Replacement System: a systematic review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30:237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lachman JR, Ramos JA, Adams SB, NunleyII JA, Easley ME, DeOrio JK. Patient-reported outcomes before and after primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40:34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dekker TJ, Walton D, Vinson EN, Hamid KS, Federer AE, Easley ME, et al. Hindfoot arthritis progression and arthrodesis risk after total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:1183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawton CD, Bennet AB, Dekker RG, Prescott A, Kadakia AR. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis: a comparison of outcomes of the last decade. J Ortho Surg Res. 2017;12:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkowitz J, Clare MP, Walling AK, Sanders R. Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusión using structural allograft and internal fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:S493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitaoka HB, Romness DW. Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1992;7:255–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Myerson MS, Aiyer AA, Ellington JK. Revision total ankle replacement. Based on an original article. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:2112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zajonz D, Prager F, Edel M, Möbius R, Daikos A, Fakler JK, et al. The significance of the vitamin D metabolism in the development of periprosthetic infections after THA and TKA: a prospective matched-pair analysis of 240 patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maier GS, Horas K, Seeger JB, Roth KE, Kurth AA, Maus U. Is there an association between periprosthetic joint infection and low vitamin D levels? Int Orthop. 2014;38:1499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hintermann B, Zwicky L, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Barg A. Hintegra revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1166–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellington JK, Gupta S, Myerson MS. Management of failures of total ankle replacement with the agility total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:2112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teller RE, Christie MJ, Martin W, Nance EP, Haas DW. Sequential indium-labeled leukocyte and bone scans to diagnose prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;373:241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bibbo C, Patel DV, Gehrmann RM, Lin SS. Chlorhexidine provides superior skin decontamiantion in foot and ankle surgery: a prospective randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:204–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scorzolini L, Lichtner M, Iannetta M, Mengoni F, Russo G, Panni AS, et al. Sonication technique improves microbiological diagnosis in patients treated with antibiotics before surgery for prosthetic joint infections. New Microbiol. 2014;37:321–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roukis TS, Berlet GC, Bibbo C, Hyer CF, Penner MJ, Wünschel M. Primary and revision total ankle replacement: evidence-based surgical management. Cham: Springer; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortega-Andreu M, Talavera G, Padilla-Eguiluz NG, Perez-Chrzanowska H, Figueredo-Galve R, Rodríguez-Merchán EC, et al. Tranexamic acid in a multimodal blood loss prevention protocol to decrease blood loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study. Open Orthop J. 2016;10:439–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu AR, Franceschina D, Haddad SL. A novel method of postoperative wound care following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:719–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moracia-Ochagavía, I., Noriega-Díaz, F., Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C. (2020). Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E. (eds) Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24773-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24773-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24772-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24773-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics