Skip to main content

Is it Possible to Run a Change Laboratory if the Company Does not Recognize its Demand as Legitimate?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Development for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases

Abstract

In recent years, there have been 12 fatal work accidents at a metropolitan passenger railway company. The Labor Prosecution Office contacted the School of Public Health to carry out a research making a deep analysis to understand the accidents and implementation of changes in this company to prevent accidents. Considering the presence of a civil accident inquiry and that the demand did not come from the company, the negotiation process for implementing the research was delayed and resulted in difficulties during the ethnographic phase. The research is still under progress. This chapter presents partial results of the application of the methodology, highlighting difficulties and strategies adopted by researchers in order to overcome difficulties. One of the strategies was the realization of workshops at the end of the ethnographic phase, aiming at presenting Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) concepts and consolidating cooperation between researchers and participants, a crucial point for the activity development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fundacentro is a governmental occupational safety, health, and environment research institution created to produce and disseminate knowledge, incorporating these themes into the elaboration and management of public policies for “sustainable development with economic growth, promotion of social equity, and environment protection” (http://www.fundacentro.gov.br/)

References

  • Almeida, I. M., & Vilela, R. A. G. (2010). Modelo de análise e prevenção de acidente de trabalho – MAPA. Piracicaba: CEREST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, I. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Silva, A. J. N., & Beltran, S. L. (2014). Modelo de Análise e Prevenção de Acidentes - MAPA: ferramenta para a vigilância em Saúde do trabalhador. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 19(12), 4679–4688. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141912.12982014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2007). In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. M. Wertsch (Eds.), Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation (pp. 363–425). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, L. L. (1993). Análise Coletiva do Trabalho. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 78(21), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Filho, J. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Garcia, E. G., & Almeida, I. M. (2013). Sobre a “aceitabilidade social” dos acidentes do trabalho e o inaceitável conceito de ato inseguro. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 38(127), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572013000100001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. G., & Querol, M. A. P. (2018). Anomalies and contradictions in an airport construction project: A historical analysis based on Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 34, ePub 00130816. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00130816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen, M., & Norros, L. (2009). Core task analysis in accident investigation: Analysis of maritime accidents in piloting situations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 11(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0104-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osório, C., Machado, J. M. H., & Minayo-Gomez, C. (2005). Proposição de um método de análise coletiva dos acidentes de trabalho no hospital. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 21(2), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000200018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Querol, M. A. P., Jackson Filho, J. M., & Cassandre, M. P. (2011). Change Laboratory: uma proposta metodológica para pesquisa e desenvolvimento da aprendizagem organizacional. Administração: ensino e pesquisa., 11(4), 609–640. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2011.v12n4.143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y. S., Ham, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2016). Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 150, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoela Gomes Reis Lopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lopes, M.G.R., Vilela, R.A.d.G., de Almeida, I.M., Zuccolotto, S., Vezzá, F.M.G. (2020). Is it Possible to Run a Change Laboratory if the Company Does not Recognize its Demand as Legitimate?. In: Vilela, R., Pereira Querol, M., Beltran Hurtado, S., Cerveny, G., Lopes, M. (eds) Collaborative Development for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24420-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24420-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24419-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24420-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics