Skip to main content

Sensitive Information Security in Network as a Service Model in Cloud-IPSec

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Decision Sciences, Image Processing, Security and Computer Vision (ICETE 2019)

Part of the book series: Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems ((LAIS,volume 3))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 784 Accesses

Abstract

The integration of material for use of the Internet, which is utilized by IT technology, is a cloud. The well-defined cloud is one of the best modern technology companies for product performance and changes depending on demand. Now, all the infrastructure of day-to-day business infrastructures, there is a lot of data necessary for the safe transfer of data through the Internet. This may include a company’s confidential information about product designs, product expiration dates, patent owner information, human resources, job evaluation, etc. Currently, all organizations are waiting on the web. Conversely, the information necessity be moderated, although it can capture the information. Consequently, all customers must use the cloud. In Hacker’s observation which in some cases is the immediate move that the sensitive information will be held within the virtual private cloud. The global security record during 2018, containing the data mobility in the cloud at about 86.67%, a global analyst estimates that this liming can be achieved at 100%. Therefore, this research paper focuses on IP security, which is a typical set of rules for obtaining Internet Protocol (IP) communication by verifying and encrypting the transfer of the information stream from the network routing as OSPF and EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) protocol to implements, the effects of using the IP security tunnel on the Network as a Service in the edge router. AES - Encryption algorithm, SHA1 hash algorithm and Pre-Shared keys are used in the proposed structure. The looking at of the domino effect also shows to facilitate the ESP protocol is vaguely less effective than the header authentication protocol, which is obviously due to the ESP protocol that supports data encryption, where Cloud is implemented with GNS3, tested in the Wireshark to protect against attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harikrishna B, Kiran S, Deep KM (2018) Network as a service model in cloud authentication by HMAC algorithm. Int J Adv Netw Appl 9(6):3623–3631

    Google Scholar 

  2. Online Source. https://docs.gns3.com/

  3. Harikrishna B, Kiran S, Murali G, Pradeep kumar Reddy R (2016) Security issues in service model of cloud computing environment. Procedia Comput Sci 87:246–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Free CCNA Tutorials (2017) Study CCNA for free! Study-ccna.com. N.p., 2017. Web. 21 March 2017

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harikrishna B, Kiran S, Pradeep Kumar Reddy R, Protection on sensitive information in cloud — cryptography algorithms. IEEE digital library. https://doi.org/10.1109/CESYS.2016.7889894

  6. Neumann JC (2015) The book of GNS3 device nodes, live switches, and the internet

    Google Scholar 

  7. Check point FireWall-1 (1997) Version 3.0 White paper. June 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace K (2015) CCNP routing and switching ROUTE 300-101 official cert guide, 1st edn. Pearson Education, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  9. Internet Key Exchange Security Protocol Commands (2002) Cisco Systems, Inc. 66973. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1828/products_command_summary_chapter09186a00800eeaf5.html

  10. Bellovin S (1996) Problem areas for the IP security protocols. In: Proceedings of the sixth usenix unix security symposium, p 116. San Jose, CA, July 1996

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kent S, Atkinson R (1998) IP authentication header. RFC 2402, November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maughan D, Schertler M, Schneider M, Turner J (1998) Internet security association and key management protocol (ISAKMP). RFC 2408, November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thayer R, Doraswamy N, Glenn R (1998) IP security document roadmap. RFC 2411, November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madson C, Glenn R (1998) The use of HMAC-SHA-1- 96 within ESP and AH. RFC 2404, November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mairs J (2002) VPNs a beginner’s guide. McGraw-Hill\Osborne, 209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kiran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bommala, H., Kiran, S. (2020). Sensitive Information Security in Network as a Service Model in Cloud-IPSec. In: Satapathy, S.C., Raju, K.S., Shyamala, K., Krishna, D.R., Favorskaya, M.N. (eds) Advances in Decision Sciences, Image Processing, Security and Computer Vision. ICETE 2019. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24322-7_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics