Skip to main content

The Role of Higher Education in the Maturity of Knowledge Commercialization Ecosystem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit (THS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 43))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge commercialization ecosystem is a concept, which considers a high level of convergence, synergy, participation, and innovation based on the interactions between parties involved in the process. In this paper, the knowledge commercialization ecosystem has been regarded as an open system and the role of higher education in the formation and maturity of it has been conceptualized. This study used a qualitative approach to explore the experiences of the knowledge commercialization experts through case studies. Thirty participants from four large universities of Iran participated in this study. The data was analysed through thematic analysis approach. The results showed that according to the experience and perspective of experts, higher education institutions play a vital role in maturity of knowledge commercialization ecosystem alongside the other institutions. Furthermore, this study explored the intellectual and practical barriers, drivers, vital processes and the concerns of knowledge commercialization. Finally, findings showed that by establishing an effective communication between Triple Helix Partners in Iran, the knowledge commercialization process would be facilitated through breaking down barriers and reducing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The material presented as Quotes is the same statements and phrases used by the contributors, and the use of direct quotes from the interviewees is one of the main tools for conveying their understanding and interpretation of the phenomenon in question [31].

References

  1. Friedrichsen M, Zarea H, Tayebi A, Abad FAS (2017) Competitive strategies of knowledge and innovation commercialization: a unified swot and fuzzy ahp approach. AD-minister (30):45–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ismail N, Nor MJM, Sidek S (2015) A Framework for a successful research products commercialisation: A case of Malaysian academic researchers. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdlatif NS, Abdullah A, Mohadjan N (2016) A pilot study of entrepreneurial orientation towards commercialization of university research products. Procedia Econ Finance 37(8):93–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cahill C, Palcic D, Reeves E (2017) Commercialization and airport performance: the case of Ireland’s DAA. J Air Transp Manage 59(2):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 29(2):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weckowska, D.M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation 41 & 42:62–74

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson AJ (2014) From the ivory tower to the startup garage: organizational context and commercialization processes. Res Policy 43(7):1144–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farhan J, Kamariah I, Nasir M (2015) A review of commercialization tools: university incubators and technology parks. Int J Econ Financial 5(1):223–228

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shane SA (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: university spin offs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Carletto C, Corral P, Guelfi A (2017) Agricultural commercialization and nutrition revisited: empirical evidence from three African countries. Food Policy 67:106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmad NH, Halim HA, Ramayah T, Popa S, Papa A (2018) The ecosystem of entrepreneurial university: the case of higher education in a developing country. Int J Technol Manage 78(1–2):52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clayton P, Feldman M, Lowe N (2018) Behind the scenes: intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Acad Manage Perspect 32(1):104–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belitski M, Heron K (2017) Expanding entrepreneurship education ecosystems. J Manage Dev 36(2):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salamzadeh A, Kawamorita Kesim H (2017) The enterprising communities and startup ecosystem in Iran. J Enterprising Communities People Places Global Econ 11(4):456–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrera F, Guerrero M, Urbano D (2018) Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem’s drivers: the role of higher education organizations. In: Entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable ecosystems, pp 109–128. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper RG (1983) A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 1:2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Rourke D (2005) Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. J Ind Ecol 9:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karlsson M (2004) Commercialization of research results in the United States–an overview of federal and academic technology transfer: ITPS, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bandarian R (2007) Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. J Technol Manage Innovation 2(4):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christian RR (2009) Concepts of ecosystem, level and scale. Ecology I:34

    Google Scholar 

  21. Durst S, Poutanen P (2013) Success factors of innovation ecosystems: a literature review. In: Smeds R, Irrmann O (eds) CO-CREATE 2013: the boundary-crossing conference on co-design in innovation, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Chevalier A, Roche F (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Res Policy 34(12):994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Acs ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Res Policy 43(3):476–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman M, Francis J, Bercovitz J (2005) Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Reg Stud 39(1):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rong K, Wu J, Shi Y, Guo L (2015) Nurturing business ecosystems for growth in a foreign market: incubating, identifying and integrating stakeholders. J Int Manage 21(4):293–308

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baxter P, Jack S (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 13(4):544–559

    Google Scholar 

  28. Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 1(3):385–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadiqi Shahmirzadi S, Adli F (2010) The relationship between higher education and the entrepreneurship spirituality of students. Educ Instruction 7(22):73–90.(in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cummings JL, Teng B (2003) Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. J Eng Technol Manage 20:39–68

    Google Scholar 

  33. Farasatkhah M (2012) University and higher education, worldviews and issues of Iran, Tehran. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lynch J (2006) It’s not easy being interdisciplinary. Int J Epidemiol 35(5):1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Parand K, Nirmandeh, Pourandokht, Faraji Ermaki, Akbar Alizadeh, Abolfazl Ahdiyeh, Narges (2011) The proposed framework for students’ learning and empowerment with a merit-oriented approach. In: The first international conference on the industry and exports of Iran. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Etzkowitz H (2002) Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Sci Public Policy 29(2):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Luthans F, Stajkovic A, Ibrayera E (2000) Enviormental and psychological callenges fading entrepreneuriral development in transitional economic. J World Bus 35(1):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jin Z (2011) Global technological change: from hard technology to soft technology. Intellect Books

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zahiri M (2007) Developing entrepreneurship in medical science universities. J Employ Entrepreneurship 5(17):9–20.(in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Etzkowitz H (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Res Policy 27(8):823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Khalidi H, Agahi H (2008) The role of university in entrepreneurship education. A collection of articles on entrepreneurship development conference in applied agricultural science education. Publication of Applied Higher Education Institution, Jihad Agriculture, Winter 2008, pp 489–480. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schotter A, Bontis N (2009) Intra-organizational knowledge exchange: an examination of reverse capability transfer in multinational corporations. J Intellectual Capital 10(1):149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carneiro A (2001) The role of intelligent resources in knowledge management. J Knowl Manage 5(4):358–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bardach E (2011) A practical guide for policy analysis: the eightfold path to more effective problem solving. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. ISBN 9781608718429

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kutinlahti P (2006) Universities approaching market: intertwining scientific and entrepreneurial goals. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.632.8479&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghasem Salimi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sepahi, M., Salimi, G., Sohrabpour, V. (2020). The Role of Higher Education in the Maturity of Knowledge Commercialization Ecosystem. In: Abu-Tair, A., Lahrech, A., Al Marri, K., Abu-Hijleh, B. (eds) Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit. THS 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23898-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics