Skip to main content

The Legal Protection of Animals in Brazil: An Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animals In Brazil

Abstract

Firstly, this chapter offers a historical analysis of the animal welfare and animal protection legislation in Brazil. Although the Brazilian Constitution brings an important rule (in article 225, paragraph 1º, VII) which determines the duty of public power to protect animals against cruelty, this is usually interpreted in the sense of conferring just an indirect protection to animals, i.e., as a way of promoting the dignity of human existence. This opens a dangerous window to practices that explore animals as things and property. The authors then argue for a different, yet plausible, interpretation of that Constitutional rule: it is possible to claim that, according to the Brazilian Constitution, animals are not mere things, they are subjects of right, and entitled to freedom from cruelty. Finally, they examine bills in the Brazilian Legislative that aim to change the status of animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2010. Homo sacer: o poder soberano e a vida nua. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2013. O aberto: o homem e o animal. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, Erika. 2003. A Proteção da Fauna sob a Ótica Constitucional. São Paulo: Juarez de Oliveira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil. 2013. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil: Constitutional text of October 5, 1988, with the alterations introduced by Constitutional Amendments no. 1/92 through 72/2013 and by Revision Constitutional Amendments no. 1/94 through 6/94; translation by Istvan Vajda, Patrícia de Queiroz Carvalho Zimbres, Vanira Tavares de Souza. Brasilia: The Federal Senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, Donald. 2014. Sentience and animal welfare. Oxfordshire: CABI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Carl, and Tom Regan. 2001. The animal rights debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, David Brion. 2006. Inhumane bondage: The rise and fall of slavery in the new world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2002. O animal que logo sou. São Paulo: UNESP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digard, Jean-Pierre. 1989. L’homme et les animaux domestiques: Anthropologie d’une passion. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayer, Joan. 2001. Animal equality: Language and liberation. Derwood, MD: Ryce Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Todd E., and Jon M. Mallatt. 2016. The ancient origins of consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorillo, C.A. Pacheco. 2002. Curso de Direito Ambiental Brasileiro. São Paulo: Saraiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C.P. 2010. Embracing humanimality: Deconstructing the human/animal dichotomy. In Arguments about animal ethics, ed. G. Goodale and J.E. Black, 11–30. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, René. 1986. The scapegoat. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houaiss, Antonio, and Mauro Villar. 2009. Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 1994. Humanity and animality. In Companion encyclopedia of anthropology, 14–32. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzey, Andrew (ed.). 2009. The link between animal abuse and human violence. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, Paulo A.L. 2015. Direito Ambiental Brasileiro, 23rd ed. São Paulo: Malheiros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis Dicionário Brasileiro da Língua Portuguesa. 2017. São Paulo: Melhoramentos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. 1998. Justice, reasons and moral standing. In Rational commitment and social justice, ed. J. Coleman and C. Morris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, J.A. Teixeira. 2017. Tutela penal de animais: uma compreensão onto-antropológica. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford dictionary of English. 2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Harper Collins (portuguese edition: 2010, São Paulo: Martins Fontes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Belknap: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Tom. 2004. The case for animal rights, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, Rogério. 2012. História da Legislação Ambiental Brasileira: Um Passeio pela Legislação, pelo Direito Ambiental e por Assuntos Correlatos. In Curso de Direito Ambiental, ed. Flávio Ahmed and Ronaldo Coutinho, 3–27. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Braga Lourenço .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lourenço, D.B., de Jesus, C.F.R. (2019). The Legal Protection of Animals in Brazil: An Overview. In: Naconecy, C. (eds) Animals In Brazil. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23377-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics