Skip to main content

IPL for Port-Wine Stains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Aesthetic Applications of Intense Pulsed Light

Abstract

Vascular anomalies can be classified as tumors (characterized by proliferating endothelium) and malformations (normal endothelial turnover). Port-wine stain (PWS) is the most common vascular malformation of the skin, present in 0.3–0.5% of newborns. Seventy to 80% of PWS occur in the face and neck regions, initially appearing as flat, pink-red macules that may gradually thicken and darken with time and may be associated with soft tissue or bone overgrowth.

In the last decades lasers have gained popularity in the treatment of PWS. Though the popular pulse-dye laser has shown benefits in the treatment of superficial PWS, it is not as effective in treating deeper PWS. There are some reasons why PWS may be resistant to treatment: inadequate depth of light penetration, inadequate conduction of heating from the chromophore to the vessel wall, inadequate blood volume (small diameter capillaries do not have enough hemoglobin) and inadequate fluence entering the capillary. Unlike lasers, owing to its variability of pulse and fluence and to its option to divide energy into different pulses, IPL enables additional heating and the coagulation of blood vessels of different diameter and different depth. Moreover, it differs from lasers by its wide spectrum of wavelengths, that leads to different absorption by the skin and a more complex tissue response. IPL respects the principle of selective photothermolysis; the preferential absorption of light by oxy/deoxy-hemoglobin and its conversion into thermal energy, leading to selective coagulation of blood vessels. Various filters can be used (available from 500 nm to 755 nm), that filter out light below the indicated wavelength. In addition, a wide range of other treatment parameters, including pulse duration, fluence, multipulse mode and intrapulse time delay, can be customized and further adjusted from treatment to treatment. The immediate appearance of perilesional erythema, a bluish-purple coloring, blanching or transient purpura is a sign of a good clinical response to the treatment. The usual treatment interval is 4–6 weeks.

We prefer starting treatment early in childhood when they are smaller and more superficially located. The child may be also referred to a pediatric consultation to rule out possible associated abnormalities. Before the treatment parents should be provided with a thorough explanation and matching of expectations should be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, et al. Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of vascular anomalies. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e203–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58:218–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JK, Ghasri P, Aguilar G, et al. An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(2):289–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly KM, Choi B, McFarlane S, et al. Description and analysis of treatments for port-wine stain birthmarks. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7(5):287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jasim ZF, Handley JM. Treatment of pulsed dye laser-resistant port wine stain birthmarks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(4):677–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adatto MA, Luc-Levy J, Mordon S. Efficacy of a novel intense pulsed light system for the treatment of port wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(2):54–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalick SM. Toward an interdisciplinary psychology of appearances. Psychiatry. 1978;41:243–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heller A, Rafman S, Svagulis I, et al. Birth defects and psychosocial adjustment. AJDC. 1985;139:257–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malm M, Calber MN. Port-wine stain: a surgical and psychological problem. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;20:512–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang B, Wu Y, Zhu X, et al. Treatment of neck port-wine stain with intense pulsed light in Chinese population. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2013;15(2):85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivas CR, Kumaresan M. Lasers for vascular lesions - standard guidelines of care. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(3):349–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pençe B, Aybey B, Ergenekon G. Outcomes of 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd -YAG laser use in the treatment of port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(5):509–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin XX, Wang W, Wu SF, et al. Treatment of capillary vascular malformation (port-wine stains) with photochemotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1826–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans AV, Robson A, Barlow RJ, et al. Treatment of port wine stains with photodynamic therapy, using pulsed dye laser as a light source, compared with pulsed dye laser alone: a pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36(4):266–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piccolo D, di Marcantonio D, Crisman G, et al. Unconventional use of intense pulsed light. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:618206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross EV, Smirnov M, Pankratov M, et al. Intense pulsed light and laser treatment of facial telangiectasias and dyspigmentation: some theoretical and practical comparisons. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 2):1188–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grillo E, et al. Histochemical evaluation of the Vessel Wall destruction and selectivity after treatment with intense pulsed light in capillary malformations. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107(3):215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raulin C, Hellwig S, Schonermark MP. Treatment of a nonresponding port-wine stain with a new pulsed light source (PhotoDerm VL). Lasers Surg Med. 1997;21(2):203–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Babilas P, Schreml ST, Hohenleutner U, et al. Split-face comparison of intense pulsed light with short- and long-pulsed dye lasers for the treatment of port-wine stains. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bjerring P, Christiansen K, Troilius A. Intense pulsed light source for the treatment of dye laser resistant port-wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2003;5(1):7–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozdemir M, Engin B, Mevlitoglu I. Treatment of facial port-wine stains with intense pulsed light: a prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(2):127–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cliff S, Misch K. Treatment of mature port wine stains with the PhotoDerm VL. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(2):101–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan PC, et al. Treatment of port wine stains with intense pulsed light: a prospective study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(6):887–90; discussion 890–1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Verkruysse W, Choi B, Zhang JR, et al. Thermal depth profiling of vascular lesions: automated regularization of reconstruction algorithms. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(5):1463–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dierickx CC, Casparian JM, Venugopalan V, et al. Thermal relaxation of port-wine stain vessels probed in vivo: the need for 1-10-millisecond laser pulse treatment. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;105(5):709–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lanigan SW. Port-wine stains unresponsive to pulsed dye laser: explanations and solutions. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(2):173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shafirstein G, Baumler W, Lapidoth M, et al. A new mathematical approach to the diffusion approximation theory for selective photothermolysis modeling and its implication in laser treatment of port-wine stains. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(4):335–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Renfro L, Geronemus RG. Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(2):182–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lanigan SW. Port wine stains on the lower limb: response to pulsed dye laser therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996;21(2):88–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McGill DJ, Mackay IR. Capillary vascular malformation response to increased ambient temperature is dependent upon anatomical location. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(2):193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adamic M, Troilius A, Adatto M, et al. Vascular lasers and IPLS: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9(2):113–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ciocon DH, Boker A, Goldberg DJ. Intense pulsed light: what works, what’s new, what’s next. Facial Plast Surg. 2009;25(5):290–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Railan D, Parlette EC, Uebelhoer NS, et al. Laser treatment of vascular lesions. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldman MP, Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Intense pulsed light as a nonablative approach to photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 2):1179–87; discussion 1187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldman MP, Eckhouse S. Photothermal sclerosis of leg veins. ESC Medical Systems, LTD Photoderm VL Cooperative Study Group. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22(4):323–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baumler W, Vural E, Landthaler M, et al. The effects of intense pulsed light (IPL) on blood vessels investigated by mathematical modeling. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(2):132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Black JF, Barton JK. Chemical and structural changes in blood undergoing laser photocoagulation. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Enjolras O, Riche MC, Merland JJ. Facial port-wine stains and Sturge-weber syndrome. Pediatrics. 1985;76(1):48–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chapas AM, Geronemus RG. Our approach to pediatric dermatologic laser surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37(4):255–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grossman MC. What is new in cutaneous laser research. Dermatol Clin. 1997;15(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Multiple Choice Questions

Multiple Choice Questions

13.1.1 Q1: Which One of the Following Statements Is Correct Regarding Vascular Anomalies?

  1. (a)

    Vascular tumors are benign vascular anomalies that may grow over time.

  2. (b)

    Vascular malformations are a result of faulty embryonic morphogenesis.

  3. (c)

    Locally aggressive vascular tumors may result from aberrant nerve supply.

  4. (d)

    Combined vascular malformations are simple malformations that are associated with other anomalies.

13.1.2 Q2: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding Port-Wine Stains (PWS) Is Correct?

  1. (a)

    PWS occurs in 3–5% of newborns.

  2. (b)

    The limbs are the most common anatomic location.

  3. (c)

    They comprise of normal numbers of capillaries with normal endothelium.

  4. (d)

    They are more commonly observed in males.

13.1.3 Q3: For Each of the Following Wavelengths, Select the Corresponding Laser Type:

  1. (A)

    532 nm

  2. (B)

    585 nm

  3. (C)

    1064 nm

  4. (D)

    390–1200 nm

    1. (a)

      PDL (Pulsed dye laser)

    2. (b)

      KTP (Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate laser)

    3. (c)

      IPL (Intense pulsed light)

    4. (d)

      Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser)

13.1.4 Q4: For Each of the Following Wavelengths, Select the Corresponding Chromophore:

  1. (A)

    Absorption peaks at 980, 1480, 2940 and 10,600 nm

  2. (B)

    Absorption peaks at 418, 542 and 577 nm

  3. (C)

    Absorption spectrum 600–750 nm

  4. (D)

    Absorption spectrum 610–870 nm

    1. (a)

      Melanin

    2. (b)

      Water

    3. (c)

      Oxyhemoglobin

    4. (d)

      Deoxyhemoglobin

13.1.5 Q5: Which of the Following Lesions Was Not Found to Be More Resistant to IPL Treatment?

  1. (a)

    PWS in lower limbs.

  2. (b)

    PWS in the central part of the face.

  3. (c)

    Deep lesions.

  4. (d)

    None of the above.

13.1.6 Q6: Which One of the Following Statements May Not Explain IPL Treatment Failure of PWS?

  1. (a)

    Inadequate penetration depth of light energy.

  2. (b)

    Inadequate conduction of light-induced heating.

  3. (c)

    Inadequate epidermal cooling.

  4. (d)

    Inadequate blood volume.

13.1.7 Q7: Which One of the Following Carry a Higher Risk for Complications When Using IPL for the Treatment of PWS?

  1. (a)

    Red PWS lesions.

  2. (b)

    Lesions in Dark skin patients.

  3. (c)

    Lesion located in the face.

  4. (d)

    Lesion of small diameter.

13.1.8 Q8: Which Is the Most Suitable IPL Parameter for a Deep, Purple, PWS Lesion?

  1. (a)

    Single pulses.

  2. (b)

    Short Interpulse delays.

  3. (c)

    Short pulse duration (<10 ms).

  4. (d)

    Epidermal cooling is not needed.

13.1.9 Q9: Which Is the Most Suitable Technique When Using IPL for a Shallow PWS Lesion?

  1. (a)

    Inject local anesthetics with adrenaline before the treatment.

  2. (b)

    Press the hand piece firmly against the skin to enable appropriate contact.

  3. (c)

    Use intense epidermal cooling during the procedure.

  4. (d)

    Apply transparent gel on the lesion before passing with the hand piece.

13.1.10 Q10: Which One of the Following Statements Regarding the Post-procedure Is Not Correct?

  1. (a)

    The immediate appearance of a purple coloring of the PWS is a sign of a good clinical response.

  2. (b)

    The usual treatment interval is 2 weeks.

  3. (c)

    Avoiding sun exposure between treatments is important

  4. (d)

    There is no restriction to using make-up immediately after treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duek, O.S., Ullmann, Y. (2020). IPL for Port-Wine Stains. In: Fodor, L., Ullmann, Y. (eds) Aesthetic Applications of Intense Pulsed Light. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22829-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22829-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22828-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22829-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics