Skip to main content

Building Socio-environmental Infrastructures for Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 38))

Abstract

Language use, second-language development, and technology mediated human activity are complex processes situated in, and in some cases demonstrably interwoven with, specific material and social contexts. This study highlights the context embedded and context producing interactional practices of learning in the wild as participants in small groups notice visible aspects of their immediate environment. The groups are involved in mobile augmented reality (AR) game play and are walking across an urban university campus and adjacent environments. Video-recorded interactions from 15 groups of three participants from four languages (English, German, Hungarian, and Japanese) were observed and transcribed. Sequential, multimodal analysis revealed numerous instances of noticing environmental resources and we show how participants use coordinated gaze, gesture, and language to make relevant particular perceived objects from the built environment for accomplishing the groups’ goal-directed activity as well as for co-constructing socio-environmental infrastructures for learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We thank the 503 design collective, David Aline, Simona Pekarek Doehler, and Leila Kääntä for their participation in the analysis sessions.

  2. 2.

    The phrase “the game’s notebook” refers to the metaphorical notebook, the place in the game app where the groups’ video or audio recordings are stored.

References

  • Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. (2009). Distributed language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefani, E. (2013). The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment. Shopping as a couple. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 123–151). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefani, E. (2014). Rearranging (in) space: On mobility and its relevance for the study of face to face interaction. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, & A. Stukenbrock (Eds.), Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional, and cognitive perspectives (pp. 434–463). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153–181). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. (1999). Directions in research: Language and the body. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. (2001). On the embodied nature of grammar. In J. Bybee & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson (pp. 79–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program. Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lantham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games and good learning. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture studies: Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes. Semiotica, 191(1–4), 257–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddington, P. (2013). Projecting mobility: Passengers directing drivers at junctions. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 179–209). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J., Thorne, S. L., & Fodor, P. (2017). Mobile reading as social and embodied practice. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., & Sykes, J. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., Dikkers, S., Martin, J., & Litts, B. (Eds.). (2015). Mobile media learning: Innovation and inspiration. Pittsburgh: ETC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches (pp. 155–175). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, T. (2009). The theory of the organism-environment system as a basis of experimental work in psychology. Ecological Psychology, 21, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, O. (2010). Erving Goffman and everyday life mobility. In M. H. Jabobsen (Ed.), The contemporary Goffman (pp. 333–351). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. M. (2015). Starting and stopping as a group: Multimodal practices for walking as a group in an augmented reality place based game. Unpublished Masters thesis. Portland State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisanen, T. (2012). “Uh-oh, we were going there”: Environmentally occasioned noticings of trouble in in-car interaction. Semiotica, 191, 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. (1982). Local deixis in route directions. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 161–182). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., & Zemel, A. (2014). Instructed objects. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 357–377). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E., Brown, B., & McGregor, M. (2016). Mediated pedestrian mobility: Walking and the Map App. Mobilities, 11(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1099900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, K. (2013). More studies in ethnomethodology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzotti, R. (2016). Experiences are objects: Towards a mind-object identity theory. Rivista Internazionale Di Filosofia E Psicologia, 7(1), 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (2006). Cognition on the ground. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2017). An interactionist perspective on the ecology of linguistic practices: The situated and embodied production of talk. In R. Ludwig, S. Pagel, & P. MĂĽhlhäusler (Eds.), Linguistic ecology and language contact (pp. 77–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.). (2014). Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1972). Notes on conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, S. B. K., & Scollon, R. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. D. (2009). Mobile media learning: Multiplicities of place. Horizon, 17(1), 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301.

  • Thorne, S. L. (2013). Language learning, ecological validity, and innovation under conditions of superdiversity. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(2), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., & Lantolf, J. (2007). A linguistics of communicative activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 170–195). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., Fischer, I., & Lu, X. (2012). The semiotic ecology and linguistic complexity of an online game world. ReCALL Journal, 24(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., Jones, A., & Lester, D. (2015). Interactional practices and artifact orientation in mobile augmented reality game play. PsychNology Journal, 13(2–3), 259–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 140–164). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–101). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). “Put your fingers right in here”: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hellermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hellermann, J., Thorne, S.L., Haley, J. (2019). Building Socio-environmental Infrastructures for Learning. In: Hellermann, J., Eskildsen, S., Pekarek Doehler, S., Piirainen-Marsh, A. (eds) Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action. Educational Linguistics, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22164-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22165-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics