Abstract
This chapter represents a first attempt at building a collection of learning behaviors in L2 speakers’ social practices in the wild. Research has shown that repair, word search activities, and definition talk provide fruitful soil for L2 learning (Brouwer 2003; Eskildsen 2018a; Eskildsen and Theodórsdóttir 2017; Eskildsen and Wagner 2015; Kasper and Burch 2016; Koshik and Seo 2012; Kurhila 2006; Markee 1994; Markee Appl Ling 29:404–427, 2008; Theodórsdóttir 2018; Theodórsdóttir and Eskildsen 2011), but a principled overview of L2 speakers’ learning behaviors when using the L2 outside of class remains to be built. Filling that gap, the chapter shows three distinct learning behaviors: (1) noticing and using new word in word searches; (2) making explicit use of the expert; and (3) re-indexing previously learned items. Consisting of out-of-classroom Danish L2 interactions, the data reveal that word searches may be built in a variety of ways, sequentially and with respect to turn-taking design, but public noticing and use of the new word on the part of the L2 speaker is argued to be a recurring learning behavior in all the examples. The re-indexing of previously learned items follows talk where an L2 speaker has been previously corrected or displayed lack of understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Adopted and revised from Eskildsen and Theodórsdóttir (2017). The present analysis focuses exclusively on learning behavior. For a fuller analysis, please see the original source.
- 2.
The clerk’s actions, correspondingly, may be referred to as “doing teaching”. My concerns are with learning behaviors and I will not deal in any principled way with such actions here (but see Theodórsdóttir 2018 for a discussion).
- 3.
This is not necessarily applicable to all word search instances but it seems to be a prototype of the instances found in my data where learning is argued to be involved. Speakers may, for instance, orient to a co-participant’s speech perturbations as a word search even though the troubling item has not been specifically indexed (Brouwer 2003).
- 4.
Note that Lena also fits the new expression semantico-syntactically to her own purposes: she changes the pronoun to “vi” (“we”) and the tense to preterit “sku” (“went”), and she coerces the structure into the general Danish V2-pattern that posits that the finite verb is in the second syntactic position (here following the adverbial “in Grand Canyon”). Note also that the verb “sku” (preterit of “skal”) is an auxiliary, etymologically related to English “shall”, that in cases like this doubles as main verb denoting motion.
- 5.
On the role of language play in L2 learning, see Bell (2017) for a recent overview.
- 6.
This lexical distinction is expressed through a modal verb in Danish (“skal”, lit: “shall”). “Bruge” is most typically translated into “use”, and “skal bruge” can be translated into the English “need” in this context.
References
Bell, N. (Ed.). (2017). Multiple perspectives on language play. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS–NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545.
Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29–47.
Brouwer, C. E. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second Language Conversations (pp. 93–113). London: Continuum.
Burch, A. R. (2014). Pursuing information. A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684.
Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62.
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 337–373). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence?: Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). The emergence of creativity in L2 English – A usage-based case-study. In N. Bell (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on language play (pp. 281–316). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018a). ‘We’re learning a lot of new words’: Encountering new L2 vocabulary outside of class. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 46–63.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018b). L2 constructions and interactional competence: Subordination and coordination in English L2 learning. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from the L2 classroom and SLA studies (pp. 61–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018c). Building a semiotic repertoire for social action: Interactional competence as biographical discovery. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 68–76.
Eskildsen, S. W. (in press a). The daily routine: Learning to do public writing in the L2 classroom. In S. Kunitz, O. Sert, & Markee, N. (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Eskildsen, S. W. (in press b). From constructions to social action: The substance of English and its learning from an interactional usage-based perspective. In C. J. Hall & R. Wicaksono (Eds.), Ontologies of English. Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 3–10.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 69–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G. (2017). Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 148–164.
Eskildsen, S., & Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 139–161.
Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65, 419–448.
Evnytskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). S/FL learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a “reconceptualised” SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819.
Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 205–217.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.
Greer, T. (this volume). Noticing words in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 131–158). Cham: Springer.
Hayashi, M. (2003). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2), 109–141.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, J., Thorne, S. L., & Haley, J. (this volume). Building socio-environmental infrastructures for learning in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 193–218). Cham: Springer.
Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 13–36.
Kasper, G., & Burch, A. R. (2016). Orienting to focus on form in the wild. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 198–232). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Koschmann, T. (2012). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In K. Mortensen & J. Wagner (Eds.), Conversation analysis. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Koshik, I., & Seo, M.-S. (2012). Word (and other) search sequences initiated by language learners. Text & Talk, 32(2), 167–189.
Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lee, Y.-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(3), 403–422.
Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98–116.
Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 594–623.
Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 193–207.
Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second-language acquisition studies. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602–615.
Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500.
Mori, J. (2010). Learning language in real time: A case study of the Japanese demonstrative pronoun ‘are’ in word-search sequences. In G. Kasper, H. t. Nguyen, D. Yoshimi, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Pragmatics in language learning (Vol. 12, pp. 15–42). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 3–24.
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (this volume). On the reflexive relation between developing L2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the ‘wild’. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 51–75). Cham: Springer.
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Piirainen-Marsh, A. & Tainio, L. (2009). Other-repetition as resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 153–169.
Rasmussen, G., Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Embedded corrections in second language talk. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 75–92). London: Continuum.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation analytic research into language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 345–363). New York: Routledge.
Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 489–516.
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machinecommunication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011a). Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. In G. Palotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 185–208). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011b). Second language interaction for business and learning. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 93–116). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Theodórsdóttir, G. (2018). L2 teaching in the wild: A closer look at correction and explanation practices in everyday L2 interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 30-45.
Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). Achieving intersubjectivity and doing learning: The use of English as a lingua franca in Icelandic L2. Nordand, 6(2), 59–85.
Turk, M. J. (1999). Negatively formulated questions in interaction. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 1, 39–48.
Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild. Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–104). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wagner, J., & Gardner, R. (2004). Introduction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 1–17). London: Continuum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eskildsen, S.W. (2019). Learning Behaviors in the Wild: How People Achieve L2 Learning Outside of Class. In: Hellermann, J., Eskildsen, S., Pekarek Doehler, S., Piirainen-Marsh, A. (eds) Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action. Educational Linguistics, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22165-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22164-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22165-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)