Skip to main content

Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategy, Value and Risk

Part of the book series: Global Financial Markets ((GFM))

  • 884 Accesses

Abstract

To deliver sustainable shareholder value, management has to simultaneously manage operations in the short term while delivering on plans for the long term. Commitments in the short term include delivering on earnings and maintaining liquidity, while in the long term, they involve developing and executing on strategy and investments. The following framework discusses the metrics that encompass current and future performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibiography

  • Amram, M, and Kulatilaka, N. Strategy and Shareholder Value Creation, the Real Option Frontier, Harvard Business School Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. and Clark, K. Design Rules, MIT, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninga, S. and Sarig, O. Corporate Finance, A Valuation Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and Scholes, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R and Myers, S. Principles of Corporate Finance, McGraw Hill, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys, E, Bellalah, M, Minh Ma, i H, and De Varenne, F. Options, Futures and Exotic Derivatives, Wiley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, M., Fridson, M. and Troughton, G. Corporate Finance – A Practical Approach, J. Wiley & Sons, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland T and Antikarov V, Real Options, Texere, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T. The Firm as a Three-Layer Cake – Optimal Investment and Financial Structure, MIT Sloan School of Business, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson K, Nitzsche D, Financial Engineering: Derivatives and Risk Management, Wiley 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A. Applied Corporate Finance, Wiley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A. Investment Valuation, Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A, and Pindyck, R. Investment under uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, K. and Pecherot Petitt, B. Valuation: Avoiding the Winner’s Curse, Prentice Hall, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geske, R. and Zhou, Y. Capital Structure Effects on Prices of Firm Stock Options: Tests Using Implied Market Values of Corporate Debt, November 2007, revised January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geske, R. The Valuation of Compound Options, Journal of Financial Economics, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. Analysis for Financial Management, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. and Lee, S. The Oxford Guide to Financial Modeling, Oxford, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke J C, Security Analysis on Wall Street, Wiley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard R A & Matheson J E, The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, SDG, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B, and Koller, T. Data focus: a long-term look at ROIC, McKinsey Quarterly 2006 Number 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, T. Strategy as a portfolio of Real Options, Harvard Business Review, September–October 1998a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, T. Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers, Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998b.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. I. Leone and R. Oriani, “Explaining the Remuneration Structure of Patent Licenses”, 14th Annual International Real Options Conference, LUISS Business School, Rome, Italy, June 16–19, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. What Management Is, The Free Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. Applications of Option-Pricing Theory: Twenty Five Years Later, The American Economic Review, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M, Modigliani, F. Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares, Journal of Business, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, R, and Jarrell, S. Driving Shareholder Value, McGraw Hill, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. Financial Theory and Financial Strategy, Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. The Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. Accounting for Intangible Assets: There is Also an Income Statement, Abacus, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2009a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. Accounting For Value, Columbia University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation, McGraw Hill/Irwin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. Accounting for Intangible Assets: There is also an Income Statement. CEASA Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis, June 2009b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, N and Ellison, M. Capital Budgeting and Long-Term Financing Decisions, The Dryden Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W, Alexander, G, and Bailey, J. Investments, Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Much Ado About Options? Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe J, Robinson T, Pinto, McLeavey W. Equity Asset Valuation, Wiley 2002/2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist, Corporate finance, 27 January 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility And Strategy In Resource Allocation, MIT Press 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Modularity

Appendix: Modularity

The waves of innovation since the start of the industrial evolution have created an economic system that is increasingly sophisticated and complex. This economic system consists of objects that result from human intelligence and endeavours. These objects, or artefacts, include physical activities such as technologies and products, and intangible objects such as systems of law, organizations, strategies, science and designs.

Artefacts develop and evolve over time, as do the firms and markets that create and support these objects. These markets, technologies, products and firms evolve interactively to produce adaptive complex systems that ultimately become industries. An artefact is described by its design, and this designing of artefacts is a continuing process that accumulates at all levels to transform industries and economies.

Modularity is a theory of complex adaptive systems, design and industrial evolution that describes the creation of complex products and processes from smaller subsystems or modules that, although are independent in their design, nonetheless function together as a complete system. The modularity concept facilitates the management of complex systems by dividing them into smaller, more manageable components. This is achieved by creating a particular design structure with a set of design principles that separate the knowledge and tasks required for complex designs and artefacts.

The modularity concept has numerous applications, which include production scale and scope, mass customization and organization theory. An example can be found in computers, an artefact that has grown in complexity over the twentieth century. In the 1970s, the computer business evolved from a highly concentrated industry to modular clusters that manufactured components of larger computers systems. New designs created the opportunity for the emergence of new firms, which focused on manufacturing specialized components, or modules, that were linked by design rules for the creation of computer systems.

At the start of a modular design process, mandatory design rules are established for all stages of design and production. These design rules allow pieces of a modular system to be changed without the need to change the system as a whole. This capability creates the flexibility for the design to evolve at the module level, and therefore creates options for designers. These options provide opportunities for innovation and capabilities for firms to complete in today’s environment.

In the twenty-first century the dynamics of global commerce will continue. The new technologies, markets, products and competitors that emerge from this process present both risk and rewards. In this context, modularity can address three issues—it increases the ability to manage complexity, it facilitates various components of a design to be worked on simultaneously, and it accommodates uncertainty. Modularity therefore offers the capabilities to manage the complexities and uncertainties in this environment, and provides a framework for creating value, growth and innovation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rogers, J. (2019). Value. In: Strategy, Value and Risk. Global Financial Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21978-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21978-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21977-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21978-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics