Abstract
Over the past few years, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) has become a major topic for discussions about Russia’s attempts to resurge as a regional—and even a global—power. However, in the political and scholarly discourse about the EAEU, there exist multiple images of this organization. The goal of this chapter is to review the perceptions of the EAEU in Eurasia and beyond. It argues that both the Russian and international observers share an important common feature in their view of the EAEU: the focus on the geopolitical role of the organization and in particular its alleged ability to enhance Russia’s influence in the global arena. From this point of view, however, the research on the EAEU faces an important problem: the institutional design of this regional organization does not seem to be particularly suitable to promote the Russian hegemony as the subsequent discussion of this chapter will show.
This chapter draws on Alexander Libman, “Russian Power Politics and the Eurasian Economic Union: The Real and the Imagined,” Rising Powers Quarterly 1, no. 1 (2017): 81–103. http://risingpowersproject.com/quarterly/russian-power-politics-eurasian-economic-union-real-imagined. The research is supported by the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities of China (Center for Russian Studies of East China Normal University), Project Number: 16JJDGJW004.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The existence of these barriers can be linked to both lack of resources and language knowledge. There is, however, a substantial tradition in Russia consciously insisting on separating Russian scholarly debate from the international one, either referring to the epistemological specifics of the Russian scholarly tradition (Yurevich 2015) or to the political tension in the relations with the West (Fenenko 2016).
- 2.
Elibrary.ru indexes most of the Russian-language academic journals. See elibrary.ru.
- 3.
On how problematic it is to try to fit the “real” EAEU into the Eurasianist rhetoric, see Laruelle (2015).
- 4.
Or, at least, did it until recently. Libman (2018) argues that there is evidence of declining interest of the Russian leadership in Eurasian regionalism since 2015.
- 5.
- 6.
Obviously, one cannot make unambiguous claims about the direction of causality between the official discourse and the discourse of the epistemic communities.
- 7.
Identifying the actual governance practices of the EAEU could, however, be a very difficult task. For instance, one should, as mentioned, hardly find any evidence of actorness of the EAEU bureaucracy vis-à-vis the nation states—the authoritarian nature of the post-Soviet countries and the bureaucratic traditions in these countries play an important role in this context. However, the actorness of the EAEU bureaucracies could manifest itself in relations with the individual national agencies, with the EAEU competing with them for attention and recognition from national leaders. This type of interaction would be very difficult to grasp empirically.
- 8.
As mentioned, however, there is very little evidence that Russia is successful in this strategy.
References
Andronova, Inna. 2016. Yevraziyskiy ekonimicheskiy soyuz: potentsial i ogranicheniya dlya global’nogo i regional’nogo liderstva. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsiy 11 (2): 7–23.
Börzel, T., and V. van Hüllen, eds. 2015. Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braterskiy, Maksim. 2015. Izolyatsionizm protiv geopolitiki: dvoystvernnaya rol’ yevraziyskogo soyuza v sisteme global’nogo upravleniya. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsiy 11 (2): 58–70.
Butorina, Olga. 2005. Ponyatie regional’noy integratsii: novye podkhody. Kosmopolis 3: 136–145.
Butorina, Olga, and Aleksandr Zakharov. 2015. O nauchnoy osnove yevraziyskogo soyuza. Yevraziyskaya Ekonomicheskaya Integratsiya 2: 52–68.
Cadier, David. 2014. Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU–Russia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis. Global Policy 5 (1): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12152.
Christiansen, Thomas, Knut Jorgensen, and Antje Wiener. 1999. The Social Construction of Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343450.
Delcour, Laure, and Kataryna Wolczuk. 2013. Eurasian Economic Integration: Implications for the EU Eastern Policy. In Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics, ed. Rilka Dragneva and Kataryna Wolczuk, 177–203. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Diesen, Glenn. 2017. Russia’s Geoeconomic Strategy for a Greater Eurasia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Elgström, Ole. 2007. Outsiders’ Perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4): 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00755.x.
Eurasian Economic Commission. 2017. Barriers, Derogations and Restrictions in the Eurasian Economic Union. Moscow: Eurasian Economic Commission.
Fenenko, Aleksey. 2016. Pochemu v Amerike ne lyubyat publikovat’ rossiyskikh avtorov? Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy 14 (1): 172–180. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2016.14.1.44.12.
Fonarev, Mikhail. 2012. Tendentsii i perspektivy rasshireniya politicheskogo vliyaniy i granits yevraziyskogo soobshestva. Yevraziyskiy Soyuz 1: 69–76.
Gast, Ann-Sophie. 2017. Regionalism in Eurasia: Explaining Authority Transfers to Regional Organizations. Free University of Berlin Working Paper. http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/wp/wp82/WP_82_Gast_WEB_neu.pdf
Glinkina, Svetlana. 2015. Geopoliticheskoe sopernichestvo na postsovetskom prostranstve kak faktor zderzhivaniya sotrudnichestva v ramkakh SNG. In Ekonomicheskoe Vzaimodeistvie Stran-Chlenov SNG v Kontekste Yevraziyskogo Integratsionnogo Proekta, ed. Leonid Vardomskiy and Artem Pylin, 11–32. Moscow: IE RAN.
Hancock, Kathleen. 2009. Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hancock, Kathleen, and Alexander Libman. 2016. Eurasia. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, ed. Tanja Börzel and Thomas Risse, 202–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Juliet, and Seçkin Köstem. 2016. Frustrated Leadership: Russia’s Economic Alternative to the West. Global Policy 7 (2): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12301.
Kheyfets, Boris. 2015. Tri videniya stran-uchstnits Yevraziyskogo Ekonimicheskogo Soyuza. In Ekonomicheskoe Vzaimodeistvie Stran-Chlenov SNG v Kontekste Yevraziyskogo Integratsionngo Proekta, ed. Leonid Vardomskiy and Artem Pylin, 33–44. Moscow: IE RAN.
Kirkham, Ksenia. 2016. The Formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How Successful Is the Russian Regional Hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies 7 (2): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.06.002.
Knobel, Aleksandr. 2015. Yevraziyskiy Ekonomicheskiy Soyuz: Perspektivy razvitiya i vozmozhnyye prepyatstviya. Voprosy Ekonomiki 3: 87–108.
Knyazev, Yuriy. 2016. Rossiya v izmenivsheysya geopoliticheskoy situatsii: uchastiye v integratsionnykh proyektakh. Svobodnaya Mysl 3: 149–162.
Krickovic, Andrej. 2014. Imperial Nostalgia or Prudent Geopolitics? Russia’s Efforts to Reintegrate the Post-Soviet Space in Geopolitical Perspective. Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (6): 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.900975.
Krotov, Mikhail, and Valeriy Muntian. 2015. Yevraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz: istoriya, osobennosti, perspektivy. Upravlencheskoe Konsultirovanie 11: 33–47.
Kühn, Werner. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union: Risks and Opportunities of an Emerging Bipolar Europe. Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 20 (2): 185–234.
Lagutina, Marina. 2015. Global’nyi region kak element mirovoy politicheskoy sistemy XXI veka. Sravnitel’naya Politika 2: 16–21.
Lane, David. 2015. Eurasian Integration as a Response to Neoliberal Globalization. In The Eurasian Project and Europe, ed. David Lane and Vsevolod Samokhvalov, 3–22. London: Macmillan.
Laruelle, Marlene. 2015. Eurasia, Eurasianism, Eurasian Union: Terminological Gaps and Overlaps. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 366. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/eurasia-eurasianism-eurasian-union-terminological-gaps-and-overlaps
Leshukov, Vladimir. 2016. Yevraziyskiy Ekonomicheskiy Soyuz: tendentsii razvitiya i riski. Masterskaya Yevraziyskikh Idei. http://eurasianworkshop.com/?p=1114
Li, Yongquan. 2018. The Greater Eurasian Partnership and the Belt and Road Initiative: Can the Two Be Linked? Journal of Eurasian Studies 9 (2): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.07.004.
Libman, Alexander. 2012. Studies of Regional Integration in the CIS and in Central Asia: A Literature Survey. EDB Center for Integration Studies Report, no. 2. https://eabr.org/en/analytics/integration-research/cii-reports/studies-of-regional-integration-in-the-cis-and-central-asia-a-literature-survey
———. 2018. Regionale Wirtschaftliche Organisation in Eurasien: Die Eurasische Wirtschaftsunion. Russland-Analysen 353: 3–6.
Libman, Alexander, and Anastassia Obydenkova. 2018. Regional International Organization as a Strategy of Autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian Foreign Policy. International Affairs 94 (5): 1037–1058.
Libman, Alexander, and Daria Ushkalova. 2013. Foreign Trade Effects of the Customs Union Between Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia. George Washington University Central Asia Program Central Asia Economic Paper, no. 8. http://centralasiaprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Economic_Papers_8_May_2013.pdf
Libman, Alexander, and Evgeny Vinokurov. 2018. Autocracies and Regional Integration: The Eurasian Case. Post-Communist Economies 30 (3): 334–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1442057.
Lukin, Alexander. 2014. Eurasian Integration and the Clash of Values. Survival 56 (4): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.920144.
Mattli, Walter. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mohammeddinov, Mikhail. 2017. What’s the Point of the Eurasian Economic Union? Russian Politics 2 (3): 334–363. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00203004.
Popescu, Nicu. 2014. Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely. Chaillot Paper, no. 132. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/183574/CP_132.pdf
Pryce, Paul. 2013. Putin’s Third Term: A Triumph of Eurasianism. Romanian Journal of European Affairs 13 (1): 25–43.
Rivera, Pablo, and Anna Garashchuk. 2016. The Eurasian Economic Union: Prospective Regional Integration in the Post-Soviet Space or Just Geopolitical Project? Eastern Journal of European Studies 7 (2): 91–110.
Roberts, Sean, and Arkady Moshes. 2016. The Eurasian Economic Union: A Case of Reproductive Integration? Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (6): 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1115198.
Saivetz, Carol. 2012. The Ties That Bind? Russia’s Evolving Relations with Its Neighbors. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (3–4): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.07.010.
Sergi, Bruno. 2018. Putin’s and Russian-Led Eurasian Economic Union: A Hybrid Half-Economics and Half-Political ‘Janus Bifrons’. Journal of Eurasian Studies 9 (1): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.12.005.
Staeger, Ueli, and Christian Bobocea. 2018. Bureaucratic Authority and Mimesis: The Eurasian Economic Union’s Multiple Integration Logics. International Spectator 53 (3): 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1490506.
Sushko, Oleksandr. 2004. The Dark Side of Integration: Ambitions of Domination in Russia’s Backyard. Washington Quarterly 27 (2): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1162/016366004773097740.
Svetlichnyi, Sergey. 2012. Yevraziyskiy Soyuz: protivodeistvie strategii anakondy. Geopolitika i Bezopasnost 1: 103–106.
Timofeev, Ivan, Yaroslav Lissovolik, and Liudmila Filippova. 2017. Russia’s Vision of the Belt and Road Initiative: From the Rivalry of the Great Powers to Forging a New Cooperation Model in Eurasia. China and World Economy 25 (5): 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12214.
Titarenko, Mikhail. 2009. Yevraziystvo kak paradigma sosushchestvovaniya i rastsveta mnogoobraziya kul’tur i tsivilizatsiy. Ekonomicheskie Strategii 5–6: 18–23. http://www.inesnet.ru/article/evrazijstvo-kak-paradigma-sosushhestvovaniya-i-rascveta-mnogoobraziya-kultur-i-civilizacij
Vasilyeva, Natalya. 2015. EAES: Rossiyskiye geopoliticheskie interesy. Upravlencheskoe Konsultirovanie 11: 98–104.
Vertzberger, Yaacov. 1990. The World in Their Mind: Information Processing, Cognition and Perception in Foreign Policy Decisionmaking. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Vinokurov, Evgeny. 2018. Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yurevich, Andrey. 2015. Imeet li nauka natsional’nye osobennosti? Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal 36 (1): 123–132.
Zhuravlev, Vitaliy. 2015. Geopoliticheskie aspekty yevraziyskoy integratsii. Vestnik Nauik i Obrazovaniya 10: 139–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Libman, A. (2020). (Mis)interpreting the Eurasian Economic Union? Images of the EAEU in Russia and the West. In: Parlar Dal, E., Erşen, E. (eds) Russia in the Changing International System. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21832-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21832-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21831-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21832-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)