Skip to main content

Influence of the Choice of a Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale on Results of the Geochronological and Geohistorical Analysis of the Marine Magnetic Anomalies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Problems of Geocosmos–2018

Abstract

Based on the Vine-Matthews hypothesis, dozens of magnetic reversal time scales have been constructed over the past 50 years, covering the Cenozoic and part of the Mesozoic eras. Using these time scales, marine magnetic anomalies have been identified, the grids of ocean floor ages have been constructed, and plate rotation parameters have been estimated from reconstructions of the edges of magnetic isochrons. Here, we study how the choice of a geomagnetic time scale influences geochronological and geohistorical interpretations of magnetic anomalies using well-mapped marine magnetic anomalies from the Indian Ocean. For the analysis, 15 of the most widely used Cenozoic time scales were chosen. For chrons C1–C5 and C23–C26, we quantify the degree of influence of the reversal time scales on the geohistorical and kinematic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Karasik, A.M.: Magnetic anomalies of the ocean and the ocean floor spreading hypothesis. Geotectonika 2, 3–18 (1971) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heirtzler, J.R.: The paleomagnetic field as inferred from marine magnetic studies. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 22(1–2), 197–211 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shreyder, A.A.: Chronology of linear marine magnetic anomalies. Izvestiya Phys. Solid Earth 29(4), 305–319 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mead, G.A.: Correlation of Cenozoic-late cretaceous geomagnetic polarity time scales: an internet archive. J. Geophys. Res. 101(B4), 8107–8110 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heirtzler, J.R., Dickson, G.O., Herron, E.M., Pitman III, W.C., Le Pichon, X.: Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals, and motions of the ocean floor and continents. J. Geophys. Res. 73(6), 2119–2136 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarling, D.H., Mitchell, J.G.: Revised Cenozoic polarity time scale. Geology 4(3), 133–136 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LaBrecque, J.L., Kent, D.V., Cande, S.C.: Revised magnetic polarity time scale for Late cretaceous and cenozoic time. Geology 5(6), 330–335 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mankinen, E.A., Dalrymple, G.B.: Revised geomagnetic polarity time scale for the interval 0–5 m.y. B.P. J. Geophys. Res. 84(B2), 615–626 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ness, G., Levi, S., Couch, R.: Marine magnetic anomaly time scales for the Cenozoic and Late Cretaceous: a Precis, critique, and synthesis. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 18(4), 753–770 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowrie, W., Alvarez, W.: One hundred million years of geomagnetic polarity history. Geology 9(9), 392–397 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harland, W.B., Cox, A.V., Llewellyn, P.G., Pickton, C.A.G., Smith, A.G., Walters, R.: A Geologic Time Scale, 131 pp. Cambridge University Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Flynn, J.J., Van Couvering, J.A.: Cenozoic geochronology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 96(11), 1499–1510 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kent, D.V., Gradstein, F.M.: A Jurassic to recent chronology. In: Vogt, P., Tucholke, B.E. (eds.) The Western North Atlantic Region, vol. M, pp. 45–50, Boulder, CO, Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harland, W.B., Armstrong, R.L., Cox, A.V., Craig, L.E., Smith, A.G., Smith, D.G.: A Geologic Time Scale 1989, 263 pp. Cambridge University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V.: A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 97(B10), 13917–13951 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100(B4), 6093–6095 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Swisher III, C.C., Aubry, M.-P.: A revised cenozoic gochronology and chronostratigraphy. In: Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Aubry, M.-P., Hardenbol, J. (eds.) Geochronology time scales and global stratigraphic correlation, pp. 129–212. SEPM, Tulsa, Oklahoma (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Huestis, S.P., Acton, G.D.: On the construction of geomagnetic timescales from non-prejudicial treatment of magnetic anomaly data from multiple ridges. Geophys. J. Int. 129, 176–182 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M., Ogg, G.: The Geologic Time Scale 2012, 1144 pp. Boston, Elsevier (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cox, A.: Geomagnetic reversals. Science 163, 237–245 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordin, V.M.: Selected Works and Memories, 138 pp. IFZ RAN (2007) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cande, S.C., LaBrecque, J.L.: Behavior of the Earth’s paleomagnetic field from small scale marine magnetic anomalies. Nature 247, 26–28 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Agrinier, P., Gallet, Y., Lewin, E.: On the age calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale. Geophys. J. Int. 137, 81–90 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Malinverno, A., Hildebrandt, J., Tominaga, M., Channell, J.E.T.: M-sequence geomagnetic polarity time scale (MHTC12) that steadies global spreading rates and incorporates astrochronology constraints. J. Geophys. Res. 117(B6), B06104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. De Vleeschouwer, D., Parnell, A.C.: Reducing time-scale uncertainty for the Devonian by integrating astrochronology and Bayesian statistics. Geology 42, 491–494 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Merkouriev, S., DeMets, C.: Constraints on Indian plate motion since 20 Ma from dense Russian magnetic data: implications for Indian plate dynamics. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q02002 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gc001079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seton, M., et al.: Community infrastructure and repository for marine magnetic identifications. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 1629–1641 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson, D.S.: Confirmation of the astronomical calibration of the magnetic polarity timescale from sea-floor spreading rates. Nature 364, 788–790 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ivanov, S.A., Merkuriev, S.A.: Preliminary results of the geohistorical and paleomagnetic analysis of marine magnetic anomalies in the Northwestern Indian Ocean. In: Nurgaliev, D., Shcherbakov, V., Kosterov A., Spassov, S., (eds.) Recent Advances in Rock Magnetism, Environmental Magnetism and Paleomagnetism, pp. 479–490. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lourens, L., Hilgen, F.J., Laskar, J., Shackleton, N.J., Wilson, D.: The neogene period. In: Gradstein, F., Ogg, J., Smith, A. (eds.) A Geologic Time Scale 2004, pp. 409–440. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wessel, P., Smith, W.H.F.: Free software helps map and display data. Eos Trans. AGU 72, 441–446 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In preparing the drawings, the GMT software package [31] was used.

We are grateful to Prof. A. L. Piskarev for critically reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergei A. Merkuryev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Merkuryev, S.A., Ivanov, S.A., DeMets, C. (2020). Influence of the Choice of a Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale on Results of the Geochronological and Geohistorical Analysis of the Marine Magnetic Anomalies. In: Yanovskaya, T., Kosterov, A., Bobrov, N., Divin, A., Saraev, A., Zolotova, N. (eds) Problems of Geocosmos–2018. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21788-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics