Skip to main content

POEM: Pre-procedural Work-Up and Indications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy

Abstract

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a transluminal endoscopic procedure which dissects the lower esophageal sphincter via access obtained through a submucosal tunnel. The procedure was first developed as a treatment for achalasia, but its indications have quickly spread. In addition to all the clinical subtypes of achalasia, its indications now include a subset of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, distal esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, and as retreatment following prior achalasia therapy. Current clinical practice suggests that the minimum work-up required prior to POEM should include upper endoscopy and high-resolution manometry. Here we review the growing body of literature regarding indications for POEM and the appropriate work-up including advanced diagnostic testing to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from LES targeted therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Presentation, diagnosis, and management of achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(8):887–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(8):1238–49; quiz 50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007;39(9):761–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42(04):265–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Samo S, Carlson DA, Gregory DL, Gawel SH, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Incidence and prevalence of achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004–2014, since the widespread use of high-resolution manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):366–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffield JA, Hamer PW, Heddle R, Holloway RH, Myers JC, Thompson SK. Incidence of achalasia in South Australia based on esophageal manometry findings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(3):648–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sodikoff JB, Lo AA, Shetuni BB, Kahrilas PJ, Yang GY, Pandolfino JE. Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(1):139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G. The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(5):954–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJPM, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(Suppl 1):57–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(5):627–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(4 Pt 1):G677–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2720–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gyawali CP. High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(Suppl 1):2–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grubel C, Hiscock R, Hebbard G. Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(5):525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soudagar AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favour high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings. Gut. 2012;61(6):798–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, Bruley des Varannes S, Gourcerol G, Coffin B, et al. High-resolution manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(3):372–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ. How to effectively use high-resolution esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(5):789–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Dunbar KB, Gawron AJ, Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Benchmarks for the interpretation of esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Ciolino JD, Grande DP, Listernick ZI, Carlson DA, et al. A system to assess the competency for interpretation of esophageal manometry identifies variation in learning curves. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(11):1708–14.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Hoeij FB, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal high-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(1):6–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schupack D, Katzka DA, Geno DM, Ravi K. The clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus in high resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. e13105-n/a.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290(5):G1033–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJPM, et al. Expert consensus document: advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;advance online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Boris L, Carlson D, Pandolfino JE. Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(8):e356–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pandolfino JE, Leslie E, Luger D, Mitchell B, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. The contractile deceleration point: an important physiologic landmark on oesophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22(4):395–400, e90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Rao GV, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: outcomes in over 400 consecutive patients. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5(5):E331–e9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Benedict JJ, Golas AA, Richter JE, Velanovich V. Health-related quality of life and physiological outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(8):778–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang Y, Xie C, Wang M, Jiang L, Shi R, Lin L. Association of high-resolution manometry metrics with the symptoms of achalasia and the symptomatic outcomes of peroral esophageal myotomy. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ju H, Ma Y, Liang K, Zhang C, Tian Z. Function of high-resolution manometry in the analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1094–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Onimaru M, Teitelbaum EN, Ujiki MB, Gitelis ME, et al. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(5):1170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leconte M, Douard R, Gaudric M, Dumontier I, Chaussade S, Dousset B. Functional results after extended myotomy for diffuse oesophageal spasm. Br J Surg. 2007;94(9):1113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, Pehlivanov N, Wisniewski R, DeSilvey D, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999;116(1):29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho YK, Lipowska AM, Nicodeme F, Teitelbaum EN, Hungness ES, Johnston ER, et al. Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high-resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(6):829–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Sternbach J, Hungness ES, Soper NJ, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry metrics of the esophagogastric junction for the assessment of treatment response in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1702–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Carlson DA, Omari T, Lin Z, Rommel N, Starkey K, Kahrilas PJ, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non-obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin Z, Imam H, Nicodeme F, Carlson DA, Lin CY, Yim B, et al. Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;307(2):G158–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin Z, Carlson DA, Dykstra K, Sternbach J, Hungness E, Kahrilas PJ, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry measurement of bolus flow time in achalasia and its correlation with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(9):1232–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M, El Zein MH, Teitelbaum EN, Ujiki MB, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(3):E195–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1098–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan SM, Wu JC, Teoh AY, Yip HC, Ng EK, Lau JY, et al. Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Oliveira JM, Birgisson S, Doinoff C, Einstein D, Herts B, Davros W, et al. Timed barium swallow: a simple technique for evaluating esophageal emptying in patients with achalasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(2):473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, Sharata AM, Ward MA, DeMeester SR, et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Achkar E, Richter JE. Timed barium oesophagram: better predictor of long term success after pneumatic dilation in achalasia than symptom assessment. Gut. 2002;50(6):765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nicodeme F, de Ruigh A, Xiao Y, Rajeswaran S, Teitelbaum EN, Hungness ES, et al. A comparison of symptom severity and bolus retention with Chicago classification esophageal pressure topography metrics in patients with achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(2):131–7; quiz e15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Agrusa A, Romano G, Frazzetta G, De Vita G, Chianetta D, Di Buono G, et al. Achalasia secondary to submucosal invasion by poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the cardia, Siewert II: consideration on preoperative workup. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:654917.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Choi MK, Kim GH, Song GA, Nam HS, Yi YS, Ahn KH, et al. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the liver initially presenting with pseudoachalasia. Gut Liver. 2012;6(2):275–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Branchi F, Tenca A, Bareggi C, Mensi C, Mauro A, Conte D, et al. A case of pseudoachalasia hiding a malignant pleural mesothelioma. Tumori. 2016;102(Suppl 2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Carter M, Deckmann RC, Smith RC, Burrell MI, Traube M. Differentiation of achalasia from pseudoachalasia by computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(4):624–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clayton SB, Patel R, Richter JE. Functional and anatomic esophagogastic junction outflow obstruction: manometry, timed barium esophagram findings, and treatment outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(6):907–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ihara E, Muta K, Fukaura K, Nakamura K. Diagnosis and treatment strategy of achalasia subtypes and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction based on high-resolution manometry. Digestion. 2017;95(1):29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Okeke FC, Raja S, Lynch KL, Dhalla S, Nandwani M, Stein EM, et al. What is the clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction? Evaluation of 60 patients at a tertiary referral center. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(6):e13061-n/a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, Hirano I, Gonsalves N, Listernick Z, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1726–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Rohof WO, Hirsch DP, Kessing BF, Boeckxstaens GE. Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(2):328–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rieder E, Swanström LL, Perretta S, Lenglinger J, Riegler M, Dunst CM. Intraoperative assessment of esophagogastric junction distensibility during per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):400–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Sternbach J, Donnan EN, Friesen L, et al. The functional lumen imaging probe detects esophageal contractility not observed with manometry in patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1742–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pandolfino JE, de Ruigh A, Nicodeme F, Xiao Y, Boris L, Kahrilas PJ. Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction assessed with the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) in achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(6):496–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ponds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, Smout AJ. Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Teitelbaum EN, Boris L, Arafat FO, Nicodeme F, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Comparison of esophagogastric junction distensibility changes during POEM and Heller myotomy using intraoperative FLIP. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4547–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Boris L, Nicodème F, et al. An extended proximal esophageal myotomy is necessary to normalize EGJ distensibility during Heller myotomy for achalasia, but not POEM. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2840–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Hirano I, Boris L, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):522–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Teitelbaum EN, Sternbach JM, El Khoury R, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, et al. The effect of incremental distal gastric myotomy lengths on EGJ distensibility during POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):745–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim WH, Cho JY, Ko WJ, Hong SP, Hahm KB, Cho JH, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia according to manometric subtype. Gut Liver. 2017;11(5):642–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1526–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes S, Chaussade S, Costantini M, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(4):718–25; quiz e13-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P, Bauerfeind P, Vassiliou MC, Werner YB, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):309–11.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Talukdar R, Inoue H, Reddy DN. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(11):3030–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, Kumar S, Jethwa P, Zaninotto G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(7):807–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Sato C, Minami H, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Chiu PW-Y, Yip HC, Bapaye A, Ujiki M, et al. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):927–33.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Meng F, Li P, Wang Y, Ji M, Wu Y, Yu L, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with pneumatic dilation for newly diagnosed achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4665–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Leeds SG, Burdick JS, Ogola GO, Ontiveros E. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus per-oral endoscopic myotomy for management of achalasia. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017;30(4):419–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Schneider AM, Louie BE, Warren HF, Farivar AS, Schembre DB, Aye RW. A matched comparison of per oral endoscopic myotomy to laparoscopic Heller myotomy in the treatment of achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(11):1789–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hungness ES, Teitelbaum EN, Santos BF, Arafat FO, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013;154(4):893–7; discussion 7-900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kahrilas PJ, Katzka D, Richter JE. Clinical practice update: the use of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia: expert review and best practice advice from the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(5):1205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: a heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2219–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. van Hoeij FB, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(9):1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Savides T. The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3322–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Swanstrom LL, Rieder E, Dunst CM. A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(6):751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Beppu R, Nakashima R, Minami H, Shiroshita T, et al. Successful treatment of diffuse esophageal spasm by peroral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(1):149–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Louis H, Covas A, Coppens E, Deviere J. Distal esophageal spasm treated by peroral endoscopic myotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(12):1926–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Khashab MA, Saxena P, Kumbhari V, Nandwani M, Roland BC, Stein E, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy as a platform for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(1):136–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhang X, Modayil RJ, Friedel D, Gurram KC, Brathwaite CE, Taylor SI, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with or without prior Heller myotomy: comparing long-term outcomes in a large U.S. single-center cohort (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(4):972–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ngamruengphong S, Inoue H, Ujiki MB, Patel LY, Bapaye A, Desai PN, et al. Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia after failed heller myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(10):1531–7.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhou PH, Li QL, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Chen WF, Cai MY, et al. Peroral endoscopic remyotomy for failed Heller myotomy: a prospective single-center study. Endoscopy. 2013;45(03):161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Vigneswaran Y, Yetasook AK, Zhao J-C, Denham W, Linn JG, Ujiki MB. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): feasible as reoperation following heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(6):1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Fumagalli U, Rosati R, De Pascale S, Porta M, Carlani E, Pestalozza A, et al. Repeated surgical or endoscopic myotomy for recurrent dysphagia in patients after previous myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(3):494–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ling T, Guo H, Zou X. Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with failure of prior pneumatic dilation: a prospective case-control study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(8):1609–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Li QL, Yao LQ, Xu XY, Zhu JY, Xu MD, Zhang YQ, et al. Repeat peroral endoscopic myotomy: a salvage option for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Endoscopy. 2016;48(2):134–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Tyberg A, Seewald S, Sharaiha RZ, Martinez G, Desai AP, Kumta NA, et al. A multicenter international registry of redo per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after failed POEM. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(6):1208–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Duan T, Tan Y, Zhou J, Lv L, Liu D. A retrospective study of peroral endoscopic full-thickness myotomy in patients with severe achalasia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(8):770–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hu J-W, Li Q-L, Zhou P-H, Yao L-Q, Xu M-D, Zhang Y-Q, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus: long-term outcomes from a prospective, single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2841–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Lv L, Liu J, Tan Y, Liu D. Peroral endoscopic full-thickness myotomy for the treatment of sigmoid-type achalasia: outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28(1):30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Maselli R, Inoue H, Misawa M, Ikeda H, Hosoya T, Onimaru M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in a 3-year-old girl with severe growth retardation, achalasia, and down syndrome. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 2 UCTN):E285–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Chen WF, Li QL, Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Zhang YQ, et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in pediatric patients: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Li C, Tan Y, Wang X, Liu D. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Tang X, Gong W, Deng Z, Zhou J, Ren Y, Zhang Q, et al. Usefulness of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in children: experience from a single center. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31(7):633–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Chen Y-I, Inoue H, Ujiki M, Draganov PV, Colavita P, Mion F, et al. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(4):956–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Pandolfino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Triggs, J.R., Pandolfino, J.E. (2020). POEM: Pre-procedural Work-Up and Indications. In: Wagh, M., Wani, S. (eds) Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21695-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21695-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21694-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21695-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics