Skip to main content

Maternity Policy and a Generation of Anxiety and Fear

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Anxiety, Worry and Fear in Childbearing

Abstract

This chapter examines how fear influences both parents and the strain it puts on life and relationships. How do external agencies influence policies and guidance so that women’s experiences shape future strategy and policy? What can support groups and peer collectives offer that maternity services do not? What is it that women want from service provision and what does it look like so that women experience less anxiety and worry? What do some services do well that others can learn from? How do women access information outside of traditional maternity settings and how does this match expectation? This chapter discusses how women are prepared for their childbearing life and then go back to work or stay at home in a new role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anaesthetists, The Royal College of Midwives, The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2007) Safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation and delivery of care in labour. RCOG Press, London. www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinicalguidance/safer-childbirth-minimum-standards-organisation-and-delivery-care-la

  • Beech B (2009) Midwifery - running down the drain. AIMS J 21(3):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier LM (2004) Expertise and control: childbearing in three twentieth century working-class Lancashire communities. Bull Hist Med 78:379–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg R (2008) Maternal deaths and vulnerable migrants, vol 371. www.thelancet.com. Accessed 16 Mar 2019

  • Brocklehurst P, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU) et al (2011) Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011:343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400. (Published 25 November 2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, MacFarlane A (1994) Where to be born? The debate and the evidence, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (1989) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester TE (1956) The Guillebaud report. Public Adm 34(2):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1956.tb01489.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane A (1971) Effectiveness and efficiency. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxon K, Chisholm A, Malouf R, Rowe R, Hollowell J (2017) What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17:103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis S (2005) Midwives and their role in the reduction of direct obstetric deaths during the late nineteenth century: the Sundsvall region of Sweden (1860–1890). Med Hist 49:321–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (2011) A revolution in maternity care? Women and the maternity services, Oxfordshire c. 1948–1974. Soc Hist Med 24(2011):389–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (2013) Wartime women giving birth: narratives of pregnancy and childbirth Britain C 1939-1960. In: Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences journal. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Security (1970) Domiciliary midwifery and maternity bed needs (Peel report). HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick-Read G (1942) Childbirth without fear. William Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnison J (1988) Midwives and medical men. A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth, 2nd edn. Historical Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwork D (1987) War is good for babies and other young children, Tavistock, London, 1987. vi + 307 pp. J Soc Policy 16:582–584. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400016238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunities Council (EOC) (2005) Britain’s hidden brain drain – final report. Equal Opportunity Commission, Manchester. http://83.137.212.42/sitearchive/eoc/PDF/brain_drain_final_report.pdf. Accessed Mar 2019

  • Expert Maternity Group (1993) Changing childbirth: the report of the expert maternity group. HMSO, London (Cumberlege report.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomon S (2001) Infant feeding in the twentieth century: formula and beikost. J Nutr 131(2):409S–420S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greer FR, Apple RD (1991) Physicians, formula companies, and advertising. A historical perspective. Am J Dis Child 145:282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heagerty B, Kirkham M, Perkins E (1997) Willing handmaidens of science? The struggle over the new midwife in early twentieth-century England reflections on midwifery. Baillière Tindall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope E (1917) Report on the physical welfare of mothers and children 1917, vol 1. The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust Curtis, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons (1992) Second report: maternity services (Winterton report). HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint publication of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, The Royal College of Midwives, The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2007) Safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation and delivery of care in labour Issued October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Leap N, Hunter B (1993) The midwife’s tale: an oral history from handywoman to professional midwife 1993. Scarlet Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G (2007) The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer—2003–2005. The seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. CEMACH, London. www.cemach.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Maternity Alliance (2018) What price safe motherhood? Charging for NHS maternity care in England and its impact on migrant women. https://www.maternityaction.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/WhatPriceSafeMotherhoodFINAL.October.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2019

  • McIntosh T (2012) A social history of maternity and childbirth: key themes in maternity care. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown TF (1976) The role of medicine-dream, mirage or nemesis? Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller A (2009) Midwife to myself’: birth narratives among women choosing unassisted home birth. Sociol Inq 79(1):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health (1959) Report of the maternity services committee (Chairman: Lord Cranbrook). HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland). Judgment date. 11 Mar 2015. Neutral citation number. [2015] UKSC 11. Case ID

    Google Scholar 

  • National Childbirth Trust (2011) NCT policy briefing: choice of place of birth

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England (2016) Better Birth. Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf. Accessed Mar 2019

  • Nursing and Midwifery Coucil (2013) Freebirthing. nmc-uk.org/Nurses-and-midwives/Regulation-in-practice/Regulation-in-Practice-Topics/Free-birthing1. Accessed 24 Feb 2015

  • Oakley A (1984) The captured womb: a history of the medical care of pregnant women. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2008) Standards for maternity care. Report of a working party. RCOG Press, London. www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/standards-maternitycare

  • Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2015) Each baby counts. https://www.rcog.org.uk/eachbabycounts. Accessed Mar 2019

  • Savage W (2011) Birth and power: a savage enquiry revisited. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller R (2013) Your no guilt pregnancy plan: a revolutionary guide to pregnancy, birth and the weeks that follow. Penguin, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles H (1967) ‘The dedicated physician’ in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. In: Gibson RW (ed) Cross currents in psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 128–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll K, Fairbrother N, Carty E, Jordan N, Miceli C, Vostrcil Y et al (2009) It’s all the rage these days. University students’ attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean birth. Birth 36(2):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00310.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tew M (1980) Is home a safer place? Health Soc Serv J 89:702–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Tew M (1981) Effect of scientific obstetrics on perinatal mortality. Health Soc Serv J 91:444–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tew M (1995) Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Therese H, Garthus-Niegel S, Adams SS, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M (2015) Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 221:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0655-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Paranjothy S (2001) Royal College of obstetricians and gynaecologists clinical effectiveness support unit. National sentinel caesarean section audit report. RCOG Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton I, Hamilton M (1995) Midwives and changing childbirth: Edinburgh & elsewhere: Books for Midwives

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2:436–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AS (1997) Women and childbirth in the twentieth century. Sutton Publishing Limited, Bodmin

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterton N (1992) House of commons health committee, second report, maternity services, vol 1. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J (2011) Is breast best? taking on the breastfeeding experts and the new high stakes of motherhood. NYU Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lidderdale, J., Gutteridge, K. (2020). Maternity Policy and a Generation of Anxiety and Fear. In: Gutteridge, K. (eds) Understanding Anxiety, Worry and Fear in Childbearing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21063-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21063-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21062-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21063-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics