Skip to main content

The Battle of Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tuna Wars
  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

The discussions about overfishing did not escape this atmosphere of heated and polarised debate, either. In 10 years the world of fisheries scientists, previously a rather impassive nerdy maths club of biologists, ecologists and economists, had changed into a swirling shark pond in which only the strongest were able to survive. There was a true war between movements, which was being fought tooth and nail. Take the iconic battle between Daniel Pauly and Ray Hilborn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pauly D (2009) Aquacalypse now. The New Republic

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenhower D (2006) The military–industrial complex; the farewell address of president Eisenhower. Basements Publications

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hilborn R (2011) Greenpeace (2016) complaint letter to the president of the University of Washington about research practices of Professor Ray Hilborn. Let us eat fish. The New York Times op-ed contribution, April 14th 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenpeace (2016) Complaint letter to the president of the University of Washington about research practices of Professor Ray Hilborn, May 11 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pauly D, Zeller D (2016) Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nat Commun 7:10244. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pauly D, Zeller D (2017) Comments on FAOs state of world fisheries and aquaculture (SOFIA 2016). Mar Policy 77:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belhabib D, Koutob V, Sall A et al (2014) Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: the case of Senegal. Fish Res 151:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Worm B, Davis B, Kettemer L et al (2013) Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar Policy 40:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilborn R, Amoroso R, Bogazzi E et al (2017) When does fishing forage species affect their predators? Fish Res 191:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White C (2018) Ray Hilborn study disputes previous findings on forage fish. fisherynation.com. http://fisherynation.com/archives/57400. Accessed 5 Nov 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adolf, S. (2019). The Battle of Science. In: Tuna Wars. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20641-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics