Skip to main content

Para-Academic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Re-imagining the Art School

Part of the book series: Creativity, Education and the Arts ((CEA))

  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

It is increasingly difficult to ascertain what lies outside the boundaries of contemporary art. In response to the constant redrawing of boundaries that is characteristic of the field, art academies are forever rearranging their own disciplinary parameters. The professional environment in which the art academy exists is not the academy’s ‘outside’; art academies lie firmly within the boundary formation of higher education while straddling the institutional formations of the artworld. Art education is more amorphous still: learning activities are hosted by all facets of the artworld. Since it forms common ground for the artworld’s variety of social groups, art education is ‘para’; it creates the possibility of dialogue and cooperation. What convergences and differences of perspective emerge when artists, artworkers and scholars self-consciously develop a suture, working to open access to the continuum of education-as-art-as-education-as-art? Para-academic prosumerism assembles the roles of producer–consumer as a form of disintermediation, narrowing the gap between learners and educators. This chapter outlines the genesis of the term ‘para-academic’, which is a symptom of, and a creative response to, the impact of the access economy on higher education. In the later sense, para-academia maps onto the D-I-T (do-it-together) sector of the artworld. Para-academia is parasitical upon, and convergent with, the academy, forming an addendum or paragon constitutive of academic practices. Para-academia, thus conceived, is a commoning counter-strategy to the enclosure of knowledge. It takes advantage of the exploitative access economy to arrive at its other: the sharing economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Authentic learning is a school-reform that combines four themes: (1) real-world problems; (2) open-ended inquiry; (3) communities of social-learners; and (4) student-directed project work (see Rule 2006: 2)

  2. 2.

    This is one way in which publicly funded art organisations satisfy their benefactor’s need to audit public engagement and accessibility. The educational value of the arts, as a form of public good, is seen to be more ‘measurable’ than their intrinsic value.

  3. 3.

    Sheldon Rothblatt notes that in ‘the absence of an idea of a university, there would exist no reason to dispute its nature. A university would simply be another institution, changing as circumstances allow, assuming new identities as easily as actors on the stage, with no particular aggregate commitment to any of a large number of easily assumed roles’ (Rothblatt 1997: 3).

  4. 4.

    ‘Flipping’ is the practice of converting subscription-based journals into open access journals.

References

  • #Alt-Academy. (2018). #Alt-Academy. Retrieved August 15, 2018, from http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/alt-ac/credits-founding-contributors.

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The Components of Authentic Learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calo, R., & Rosenblat, A. (2017). The Taking Economy: Uber, Information, and Power. Columbia Law Review, 117(6), 1623–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. (1964). The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. (1981). The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1987). The Truth in Painting. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, G. (1997). The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, J. (2011). You Work at Brown: What Do You Teach? #Alt-Academy: 01: Alternative Academic Careers for Humanities Scholars, 1, 20–37. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/alt-ac.

  • Geertz, C. (1976). Art as a Cultural System. MLN, 91(6), 1473–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Graziano, V., & Kelly, S. (2016). The Educational Turn in Art. Performance Research, 21(6), 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris, H., Göthlund, A., & Thrane, K. W. (2015). Introduction. In H. Illeris, A. Göthlund, & K. W. Thrane (Eds.), EDGE: 20 Essays on Contemporary Art Education (pp. 19–25). Copenhagen: Multivers Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, E. (2012). PARTY! Or Is It a Panel Discussion on Para-Academic Publishing, or BOTH? Retrieved from https://punctumbooks.com/blog/party-or-is-it-a-panel-discussion-on-para-academic-publishing-or-both/.

  • Joy, E. (2014). Epicurian Rain. In A. W. Wardrop (Ed.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 291–300). Bristol: HammerOn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am Revolution: How Enthusiasts Are Changing Our Economy and Society. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2011). The Morphing of Academic Practice: Unbundling and the Rise of the Para-Academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, E. (2016). Opening Interstitial Distances in the Neoliberal University and Art School. Performance Research, 21(6), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. (2011). Educations Sentimental and Unsentimental: Repositioning the Politics of Art and Education. Redhook: Journal of Curatorial Studies, 1(n/a): n/a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. (2014). Marginal Inquiries. In A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 263–290). Bristol: HammerOn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2004). The University and the Undercommons: Seven Theses. Social Text, 22(2), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, P., & Wilson, M. (2010). Curating and the Educational Turn. London: Open Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2001). The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life Is a Paid-for Experience. New York: J. P. Tarcher/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2009). Toward a Global Autonomous University. In Edufactory Collective (Ed.), The Rise of the Global University (pp. 18–31). Brooklyn and New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothblatt, S. (1997). The Modern University and Its Discontents: The Fate of Newman’s Legacies in Britain and America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences. Harvard University. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27803834.

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop, A., & Withers, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting. Bristol: HammerOn Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Mulholland .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mulholland, N. (2019). Para-Academic. In: Re-imagining the Art School. Creativity, Education and the Arts. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20629-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20629-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20628-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20629-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics