Abstract
It is increasingly difficult to ascertain what lies outside the boundaries of contemporary art. In response to the constant redrawing of boundaries that is characteristic of the field, art academies are forever rearranging their own disciplinary parameters. The professional environment in which the art academy exists is not the academy’s ‘outside’; art academies lie firmly within the boundary formation of higher education while straddling the institutional formations of the artworld. Art education is more amorphous still: learning activities are hosted by all facets of the artworld. Since it forms common ground for the artworld’s variety of social groups, art education is ‘para’; it creates the possibility of dialogue and cooperation. What convergences and differences of perspective emerge when artists, artworkers and scholars self-consciously develop a suture, working to open access to the continuum of education-as-art-as-education-as-art? Para-academic prosumerism assembles the roles of producer–consumer as a form of disintermediation, narrowing the gap between learners and educators. This chapter outlines the genesis of the term ‘para-academic’, which is a symptom of, and a creative response to, the impact of the access economy on higher education. In the later sense, para-academia maps onto the D-I-T (do-it-together) sector of the artworld. Para-academia is parasitical upon, and convergent with, the academy, forming an addendum or paragon constitutive of academic practices. Para-academia, thus conceived, is a commoning counter-strategy to the enclosure of knowledge. It takes advantage of the exploitative access economy to arrive at its other: the sharing economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Authentic learning is a school-reform that combines four themes: (1) real-world problems; (2) open-ended inquiry; (3) communities of social-learners; and (4) student-directed project work (see Rule 2006: 2)
- 2.
This is one way in which publicly funded art organisations satisfy their benefactor’s need to audit public engagement and accessibility. The educational value of the arts, as a form of public good, is seen to be more ‘measurable’ than their intrinsic value.
- 3.
Sheldon Rothblatt notes that in ‘the absence of an idea of a university, there would exist no reason to dispute its nature. A university would simply be another institution, changing as circumstances allow, assuming new identities as easily as actors on the stage, with no particular aggregate commitment to any of a large number of easily assumed roles’ (Rothblatt 1997: 3).
- 4.
‘Flipping’ is the practice of converting subscription-based journals into open access journals.
References
#Alt-Academy. (2018). #Alt-Academy. Retrieved August 15, 2018, from http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/alt-ac/credits-founding-contributors.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The Components of Authentic Learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.
Calo, R., & Rosenblat, A. (2017). The Taking Economy: Uber, Information, and Power. Columbia Law Review, 117(6), 1623–1690.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Danto, A. (1964). The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.
Danto, A. (1981). The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Derrida, J. (1987). The Truth in Painting. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dickie, G. (1997). The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.
Flanders, J. (2011). You Work at Brown: What Do You Teach? #Alt-Academy: 01: Alternative Academic Careers for Humanities Scholars, 1, 20–37. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/alt-ac.
Geertz, C. (1976). Art as a Cultural System. MLN, 91(6), 1473–1499.
Graham, J., Graziano, V., & Kelly, S. (2016). The Educational Turn in Art. Performance Research, 21(6), 29–35.
Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.
Illeris, H., Göthlund, A., & Thrane, K. W. (2015). Introduction. In H. Illeris, A. Göthlund, & K. W. Thrane (Eds.), EDGE: 20 Essays on Contemporary Art Education (pp. 19–25). Copenhagen: Multivers Academic.
Joy, E. (2012). PARTY! Or Is It a Panel Discussion on Para-Academic Publishing, or BOTH? Retrieved from https://punctumbooks.com/blog/party-or-is-it-a-panel-discussion-on-para-academic-publishing-or-both/.
Joy, E. (2014). Epicurian Rain. In A. W. Wardrop (Ed.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 291–300). Bristol: HammerOn Press.
Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am Revolution: How Enthusiasts Are Changing Our Economy and Society. London: Demos.
Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Macfarlane, B. (2011). The Morphing of Academic Practice: Unbundling and the Rise of the Para-Academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.
Mahony, E. (2016). Opening Interstitial Distances in the Neoliberal University and Art School. Performance Research, 21(6), 51–56.
Malik, S. (2011). Educations Sentimental and Unsentimental: Repositioning the Politics of Art and Education. Redhook: Journal of Curatorial Studies, 1(n/a): n/a.
Mayhew, M. (2014). Marginal Inquiries. In A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 263–290). Bristol: HammerOn Press.
Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2004). The University and the Undercommons: Seven Theses. Social Text, 22(2), 101–115.
Neill, P., & Wilson, M. (2010). Curating and the Educational Turn. London: Open Editions.
Rifkin, J. (2001). The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life Is a Paid-for Experience. New York: J. P. Tarcher/Putnam.
Ross, A. (2009). Toward a Global Autonomous University. In Edufactory Collective (Ed.), The Rise of the Global University (pp. 18–31). Brooklyn and New York: Autonomedia.
Rothblatt, S. (1997). The Modern University and Its Discontents: The Fate of Newman’s Legacies in Britain and America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences. Harvard University. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27803834.
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. London: Collins.
Wardrop, A., & Withers, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting. Bristol: HammerOn Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mulholland, N. (2019). Para-Academic. In: Re-imagining the Art School. Creativity, Education and the Arts. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20629-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20629-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20628-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20629-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)