Skip to main content

Towards a Coherent Assessment of Situational Awareness to Support System Design in the Maritime Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 965))

Abstract

Information systems in support to Situational Awareness (SAW), such as maritime surveillance systems, are an important family of tools that introduced automation with respect to the human cognitive activities. An integral part of the system design process is the testing and evaluation phase. The formal assessment of the mental state of SAW is a complex task. It appears that SAW assessment in testing and evaluation is often either overlooked by adopting a technology-focused approach or only partially addressed through the use of specific human factors methods. In this paper the authors will discuss how the testing and evaluation of maritime surveillance systems could account both for the system components enabling Situational Awareness and the human element. Furthermore, for such systems a simple and coherent list of key performance indicators and measures of performance is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30, pp. 286–297 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Endsley, R.M.: The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In: Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting, pp. 1388–1392. Human Factor Society, Santa Monica, CA (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Endsley, R.M.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37(1), 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nato Marcom, Marcom MSA Direction and Guidance (NATO UNCLASSIFIED). Technical Report Version 2.0, NATO MARCOM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. NATO - STANAG 1241 Standard Identity Description Structure for Tactical Use (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mevassvik, O.M., Veum, K.: Distributed maritime situation picture production and data fusion. In: 4th International Conference on Information Fusion (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stowers, K., Oglesby, J., Sonesh, S., Leyva, K., Iwig, C., Salas, E.: A framework to guide the assessment of human–machine systems. Hum. Factors 59(2), 172–188 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478), pp. 3/1–3/17, Neuilly Sur Seine (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E.: Automation surprises. Handb. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2, 1926–1943 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blasch, E.P., Valin, P., Bosse, E.: Measures of effectiveness for high-level fusion. In: 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waltz, E., Llinas, J.: System Modeling and Performance Evaluation. Multisensor Data Fusion Systems, Artech House, Boston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Llinas, J.: Assessing the performance of multisensor fusion processes. In: Hall, D., Llinas, J. (eds.) Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Theil, A., Kester, L.J.H.M., Bosse, E.: On measures of performance to assess sensor fusion effectiveness. In: 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Laere, J.: Challenges for IF performance evaluation in practice. In: 12th International Conference on Information Fusion (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Costa, P., Laskey, K., Blasch, E., Jousselme, A.L.: Towards unbiased evaluation of uncertainty reasoning: The URREF ontology. In: 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blasch, E.P., Breton, R., Valin, P.: Information fusion measures of effectiveness (MOE) for decision support. In: SPIE 8050 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sheridan, T.B.: Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Wiley, Santa Monica (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marquez, J.J., Gore, B.F.: Measuring safety and performance in human–automation systems: special issue commentary. Hum. Factors 59(2), 169–171 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness measurement in test and evaluation. In: O’Brien, T.G., Charlton, S.G. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors Testing & Evaluation, pp. 159–180. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Endsley, M.: Situation awareness and workload: flip sides of the same coin. In: Jensen, R.S., Neumeister, D. (Eds.) Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 906–911 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 2(2), 140–160 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vidulich, M.A., Tsang, P.S.: The confluence of situation awareness and mental workload for adaptable human-machine systems. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 9(1), 95–97 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Endsley, M.R.: Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J. (eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P.: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate Publishing Company, Brookfield (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Endsley, R.M.: Measurements of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37(1), 65–84 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hogg, D.N., Folleso, K., Strand-Volden, F., Torralba, B.: Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control room. Ergonomics 38(11), 2394–2413 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hauss, Y., Gauss, B., Eyferth, K.: SALSA - a new approach to measure situational awareness in air traffic control. Focusing Attention on Aviation Safety. In: 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jeannott, E., Kelly, C., Thompson, D.: The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems. Technical Report, EATMP (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Durso, F.T., Hackworth, C.A., Truitt, T., Crutchfield, J., Manning, C.A.: Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Q. 6, 1–20 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McGuinness, B., Foy, L.: A subjective measure of SA: the Crew Awareness Rating Scale (CARS). In: Human Performance, Situational Awareness and Automation Conference, Savannah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matthews, M.D., Beal, S.A.: Assessing situation awareness in field training exercises. Research Report, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Waag, W.L., Houck, M.R.: Tools for assessing situational awareness in an operational fighter environment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 65(5), A13–A19 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dennehy, K.: Cranfield - situation awareness scale user manual. Technical Report, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, Bedford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Matthews, M.D., Pleban, R.J., Endsley, M.R., Strater, L.D.: Measures of infantry situation awareness for a virtual MOUT environment. In: Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference (HPSAA II), Daytona, LEA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sullivan, C., Blackman, H.S.: Insights into pilot situation awareness using verbal protocol analysis. In: Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1, pp. 57–61. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 1, 45–57 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. de Rosa, F., Jousselme, A.-L., De Gloria, A.: A reliability game for source factors and situational awareness experimentation. Int. J. Serious Games 5(2), 45–64 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jousselme, A.-L., Pallotta, G., Locke, J.: Risk game: capturing impact of information quality on human belief assessment and decision making. Int. J. Serious Games 5(4), 23–44 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. SIAP System Engineering Task Force (SIAP SETF): Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP) Attributes Version 2.0. Technical Report 2003-029 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Representative measures of a single integrated air picture. Technical Report, NAVSEA 05 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NATO Allied Command Trans-formation (NATO-ACT) through the DKOE programme of work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca de Rosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Rosa, F., Jousselme, AL. (2020). Towards a Coherent Assessment of Situational Awareness to Support System Design in the Maritime Context. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 965. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20453-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20454-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics