Abstract
This procedure describes titrimetric determination of mass fraction of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and total iron content (Fe-tot) in Ilmenite and Titanium Slag.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Readings
ISO 591-1: 2000 Titanium dioxide pigments for paints – Part 1: Specifications and methods of test
J. D. Norris; Analyst, November 1984, Vol. 109: Determination of titanium in titanium dioxide pigments, paints and other materials by chromium(II) chloride reduction and automatic potentiometric titration
ISO 21748: 2010 Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation
ISO TR 13587: 2012 Three statistical approaches for the assessment and interpretation of measurement uncertainty
ISO 7870-2: 2013 Control charts – Part 2: Shewhart control charts
ISO 2854: 1976 Statistical interpretation of data – Techniques of estimation and tests relating to means and variances
EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG4: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Third Edition, 2012
Eurolab Technical Report No. 1/2002: Measurement Uncertainty in Testing
NORDTEST Report TR 537: Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories, Edition 3.1, 2012
R. Bettencourt da Silva, E. Bulska, B. Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz, M. Hedrich, N. Majcen, B. Magnusson, S. Marinčić, I. Papadakis, M. Patriarca, E. Vassileva, P. Taylor; Analytical measurement: measurement uncertainty and statistics, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, © European Union, 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Excercise 1: Establishing Traceability in Analytical Chemistry
- 1.:
-
Specifying the analyte and measurand
Analyte | TiO2 Fe-tot |
Measurand | Mass fraction of TiO2 in Ilmenite Mass fraction of TiO2 in Titanium Slag Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Ilmenite Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Titanium Slag |
Units | % |
- 2. :
-
Choosing a suitable measurement procedure with associated model equation
Measurement procedure | The method is comprised of two parts. In the first the solution of potassium dichromate is standardized by using the certified reference material (CRM Ilmenite or CRM Titanium Slag), and in the second part the mass fraction of TiO2 and Fe-tot is determined in a sample of Ilmenite or Ti-Slag by titration. Determination of the equivalence points is potentiometric using a gold indicator electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode The sample of Ilmenite or Ti-Slag is dried at 110 °C to constant mass. Dried sample is fused with melted potassium pyrosulfate and the melt is dissolved in hydrochloric acid. By addition of the excess of the solution of chromium(II) chloride Ti4+ is reduced to Ti3+ and Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ in the inert atmosphere of carbon dioxide With potassium dichromate is titrated the firstly exceeded chromium(II) chloride (1st equivalence point), then Ti3+ (2nd equivalence point) and then Fe2+ (3rd equivalence point) | ||
Type of calibration * | standard curve | standard addition | internal standard |
Model equation
Mass fraction of TiO2 and Fe-tot is calculated by:
Ilmenite
Ti-Slag
- \(V_{EX1}\) :
-
excess volume of K2Cr2O7 1st titration [mL]
- \(V_{EX2}\) :
-
excess volume of K2Cr2O7 2nd titration [mL]
- \(V_{EQ2}\) :
-
volume of K2Cr2O7 used for Ti3+ titration (2nd titration) [mL]
- \(V_{EQ3}\) :
-
volume of K2Cr2O7 used for Fe2+ titration (3rd titration) [mL]
- \(V_{500}\) :
-
volume of dissolved sample or CRM (500 mL flask) [mL]
- \(V_{100}\) :
-
volume of sample aliquot or CRM aliquot (100 mL pipette) [mL]
- \(m\) :
-
mass of sample or CRM [g]
- \(W\) :
-
mass fraction [%]
- \(H\) :
-
standardization parameter [g mL−1].
- 3. :
-
List the input quantities according to their influence on the uncertainty of the result of the measurement (first the most important ones). At this point, your judgement should be based on your previous experience only
1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite or CRM Titanium Slag – \(H\) |
2 | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration – \(V_{EQ}\) |
3 | Repeatability – \(P\) |
4 | Volume of dissolved sample – \(V_{500}\) |
5 | Volume of sample aliquot – \(V_{100}\) |
- 4.:
-
List the reference standards needed and state the information regarding traceability of the reference value
For the analyte
1 | Name/Chemical Formula/Producer: | Ilmenite SARM 59/Mintek |
2 | Name/Chemical Formula/Producer: | Titanium Slag SARM 58/Mintek |
For the other input quantities
1 | Quantity/Equipment/Calibration: e.g. mass/balance/calibrated by NMI, U = xx (k = 2), see also data yellow sheet | Analytical and precise balance – calibrated by NMI |
2 | Quantity/Equipment/calibration: | Automatic titrator Mettler DL70ES with gold indicator electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrode – calibrated by producer |
3 | Quantity/Equipment/calibration: | Burettes Mettler – calibrated by producer |
4 | Quantity/Equipment/calibration: | Volumetric flask – class A quality |
5 | Quantity/Equipment/calibration: | Volumetric pipette – class A quality |
- 5. :
-
Estimating uncertainty associated with the measurement
Are all important parameters included in the model equation? | Yes | No |
Other important parameters are: | Within-lab repeatability or reproducibility |
- 6. :
-
How would you prove traceability of your result?
1 | Analysis of matrix CRM |
2 | Participation in a proficiency testing scheme |
- 7. :
-
Any other comments, questions…
. |
. |
Exercise 2: Single Laboratory Validation of Measurement Procedures
2.1 Part I: General Issues
- 1. :
-
Specify the measurement procedure, analyte, measurand and units
The measurement procedure | Titrimetric determination of mass fraction of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and total iron content (Fe-tot) in Ilmenite and Titanium Slag |
---|---|
Analyte | TiO2 Fe-tot |
The measurand | Mass fraction of TiO2 in Ilmenite Mass fraction of TiO2 in Titanium Slag Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Ilmenite Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Titanium Slag |
Unit | % |
- 2. :
-
Specify the Scope
Matrix | Ilmenite and Titanium Slag | ||
Measuring range | Analyte | Ilmenite | Titanium Slag |
TiO2 | from 30 to 60% | from 60 to 90% | |
Fe-tot | from 20 to 40% | from 5 to 20% |
- 3. :
-
Requirement on the measurement procedure
Intended use of the results | Quality control of Ilmenite and Titanium Slag (raw materials) | ||
Mark the customer’s requirements and give their values | Parameters to be validated | Value requested by the customer | |
| LOD | ||
| LOQ | ||
| Repeatability | ||
| Within-lab reproducibility | ||
| Trueness | ||
| Measurement uncertainty | TiO2: Urel < 1% Fe-tot: Urel < 5% | |
| Other-state |
- 4. :
-
Origin of the Measurement Procedure
VALIDATION | ||
New In-House Method |
| Full |
Modified Validated Method |
| Partial |
Official Standard Method |
| Confirmation/Verification |
2.2 Part II: Parameters to Be Validated
- 5. :
-
Selectivity/Interference/Recovery
Where yes, please give further information e.g. which CRM, reference method
| CRM/RM: analysis of available CRM or RM |
Further information: CRM SARM 59 – Ilmenite, CRM SARM 57 – Titanium Slag | |
| Spike of pure substance |
| Compare with a reference method |
| Selectivity, interferences |
| Test with different matrices |
| Other – please specify |
Participation in the inter laboratory comparison organized by the Quality Control Department of Cinkarna Celje, “Measurements of various parameters in some TiO2 based materials, March 2011” |
- 6. :
-
Measuring range
| Linearity |
| Upper limit |
| LOD |
| LOQ |
- 7. :
-
Spread – Precision
| Repeatability |
| Reproducibility (within Lab) |
| Reproducibility (between Lab) |
- 8. :
-
Robustness
| Variation of parameters |
- 9. :
-
Quality Control
| Control charts |
| Participation in PT schemes |
- 10. :
-
Other parameters to be tested
| Working range and testing of homogeneity of variances |
| R square |
| Residual standard deviation |
| Standard deviation of the analytical procedure |
| Coefficient of variation of the analytical procedure |
| Measurement uncertainty |
2.3 Part III: Some Calculations and Conclusions
- 11. :
-
Calculation of parameters requested by the customer
Parameters requested to be validated | Calculations | |
---|---|---|
| LOD | |
| LOQ | |
| Repeatability | |
| Within-lab reproducibility | |
| Trueness | |
| Measurement uncertainty | |
| Other-please state |
- 12. :
-
Does the analytical procedure fulfil the requirement(s) for the intended use?
Parameter | Value requested by the customer (the same as stated in question 3) | Value obtained during validation | The requirement is fulfilled Yes/No |
---|---|---|---|
LOD | |||
LOQ | |||
Repeatability | |||
Within-lab reproducibility | |||
Trueness | |||
Measurement uncertainty | TiO2: Urel < 1% Fe-tot: Urel < 5% | Ilmenite: TiO2: Urel = 0.74% Fe-tot: Urel = 1.2% Ti-Slag: TiO2: Urel = 0.54% Fe-tot: Urel = 2.9% | Yes |
Other |
The analytical procedure is fit for the intended use:
Yes No
For Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability refer to the corresponding sheets
Building An Uncertainty Budget
- 1. :
-
Specify the measurand and units
Measurand | Mass fraction of TiO2 in Ilmenite Mass fraction of TiO2 in Titanium Slag Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Ilmenite Mass fraction of Fe-tot in Titanium Slag |
Unit | % |
- 2. :
-
Describe the measurement procedure and provide the associated model equation
Measurement procedure:
The method is comprised of two parts. In the first the solution of potassium dichromate is standardized by using the certified reference material (CRM Ilmenite or CRM Titanium Slag), and in the second part the mass fraction of TiO2 and Fe-tot is determined in a sample of Ilmenite or Ti-Slag by titration. Determination of the equivalence points is potentiometric using a gold indicator electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode.
The sample of Ilmenite or Ti-Slag is dried at 110 °C to constant mass. Dried sample is fused with melted potassium pyrosulfate and the melt is dissolved in hydrochloric acid. By addition of the excess of the solution of chromium(II) chloride Ti4+ is reduced to Ti3+ and Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ in the inert atmosphere of carbon dioxide.
With potassium dichromate is titrated the firstly exceeded chromium(II) chloride (1st equivalence point), then Ti3+ (2nd equivalence point) and then Fe2+ (3rd equivalence point).
Model equation:
Mass fraction of TiO2 and Fe-tot is calculated by:
Ilmenite
Ti-Slag
- \(V_{EX1}\) :
-
excess volume of K2Cr2O7 1st titration [mL]
- \(V_{EX2}\) :
-
excess volume of K2Cr2O7 2nd titration [mL]
- \(V_{EQ2}\) :
-
volume of K2Cr2O7 used for Ti3+ titration (2nd titration) [mL]
- \(V_{EQ3}\) :
-
volume of K2Cr2O7 used for Fe2+ titration (3rd titration) [mL]
- \(V_{500}\) :
-
volume of dissolved sample or CRM (500 mL flask) [mL]
- \(V_{100}\) :
-
volume of sample aliquot or CRM aliquot (100 mL pipette) [mL]
- \(m\) :
-
mass of sample or CRM [g]
- \(W\) :
-
mass fraction [%]
- \(H\) :
-
standardization parameter [g/mL]
- 3. :
-
Identify (all possible) sources of uncertainty
| Repeatability |
| Volume of sample aliquot |
| Volume of dissolved sample |
| Mass of sample |
| Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM |
| Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
- 4. :
-
Evaluate values of each input quantity
Determination of mass fraction of TiO 2 in Ilmenite [%]
Input quantity | Value | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
\(V_{100}\) | 100 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 500 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.5101 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{8}\) | 0.009585 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite |
\(V_{EX1} + V_{EQ2}\) | 5.7155 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of Fe-tot in Ilmenite [%]
Input quantity | Value | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
\(V_{100}\) | 100 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 500 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.5101 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{9}\) | 0.006835 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite |
\(V_{EX2} + V_{EQ3}\) | 4.5732 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of TiO 2 in Titanium Slag [%]
Input quantity | Value | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
\(V_{100}\) | 100 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 500 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.5050 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{11}\) | 0.004862 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Titanium Slag |
\(V_{EX1} + V_{EQ2}\) | 16.2883 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of Fe-tot in Titanium Slag [%]
Input quantity | Value | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
\(V_{100}\) | 100 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 500 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.5050 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{12}\) | 0.003480 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Titanium Slag |
\(V_{EX2} + V_{EQ3}\) | 1.8276 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
- 5. :
-
Evaluate the standard uncertainty of each contribution
Determination of mass fraction of TiO 2 in Ilmenite [%]
Input quantity | Standard uncertainty | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
P | 0.068 | % | Repeatability |
\(V_{100}\) | 0.0489 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 0.2086 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.00015 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{8}\) | 0.0000298 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite |
\(V_{EX1} + V_{EQ2}\) | 0.00836 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of Fe-tot in Ilmenite [%]
Input quantity | Standard uncertainty | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
P | 0.064 | % | Repeatability |
\(V_{100}\) | 0.0489 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 0.2086 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.00015 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{9}\) | 0.0000360 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite |
\(V_{EX2} + V_{EQ3}\) | 0.00836 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of TiO 2 in Titanium Slag [%]
Input quantity | Standard uncertainty | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
\(P\) | 0.066 | % | Repeatability |
\(V_{100}\) | 0.0489 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 0.2086 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.00015 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{11}\) | 0.0000105 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Titanium Slag |
\(V_{EX1} + V_{EQ2}\) | 0.0174 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
Determination of mass fraction of Fe-tot in Titanium Slag [%]
Input quantity | Standard uncertainty | Unit | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
P | 0.030 | % | Repeatability |
\(V_{100}\) | 0.0489 | mL | Volume of sample aliquot |
\(V_{500}\) | 0.2086 | mL | Volume of dissolved sample |
\(m_{s}\) | 0.00015 | g | Mass of sample |
\(H_{12}\) | 0.0000344 | g mL−1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Titanium Slag |
\(V_{EX2} + V_{EQ3}\) | 0.0163 | mL | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration |
- 6.:
-
Calculate the value of the measurand, using the model equation
Ilmenite – TiO 2
Ilmenite – Fe-tot
Titanium Slag – TiO 2
Titanium Slag – Fe-tot
- 7.:
-
Calculate the combined standard uncertainty (u c ) of the result & specify units
Using: Mathematical solution; Spreadsheet Approach; Commercial Software
Ilmenite | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TiO 2 | Fe-tot | ||||||
Unit | Value | u | \(u_{rel}\) | Value | u | \(u_{rel}\) | |
P | % | – | 0.068 | 0.00127 | – | 0.064 | 0.00209 |
\(V_{100}\) | mL | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 |
\(V_{500}\) | mL | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 |
\(m_{s}\) | g | 0.5101 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 | 0.5101 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 |
H | g/mL | 0.009585 | 0.0000298 | 0.00311 | 0.006835 | 0.0000360 | 0.00527 |
\(V_{EX} + V_{EQ}\) | mL | 5.7155 | 0.00836 | 0.00146 | 4.5732 | 0.00836 | 0.00183 |
W | % | 53.70 | 0.200 | 0.00373 | 30.64 | 0.184 | 0.00600 |
Titanium slag | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TiO 2 | Fe-tot | ||||||
Unit | Value | u | \(u_{rel}\) | Value | u | \(u_{rel}\) | |
P | % | – | 0.066 | 0.00084 | – | 0.030 | 0.00476 |
\(V_{100}\) | mL | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 |
\(V_{500}\) | mL | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 |
\(m_{s}\) | g | 0.5050 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 | 0.5050 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 |
H | g/mL | 0.004862 | 0.0000105 | 0.00216 | 0.003480 | 0.0000344 | 0.00989 |
\(V_{EX} + V_{EQ}\) | mL | 16.2883 | 0.0174 | 0.00107 | 1.8276 | 0.0163 | 0.00892 |
W | % | 78.41 | 0.208 | 0.00265 | 6.30 | 0.089 | 0.0142 |
- 8. :
-
Calculate expanded uncertainty (U c ) & specify the coverage factor k and the units
k = 2 | ILMENITE | TITANIUM SLAG | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TiO2 | Fe-tot | TiO2 | Fe-tot | ||
U * | % | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.18 |
- 9. :
-
Analyse the uncertainty contribution & specify the main three input quantities contributing the most to U c
1 | Standardization of K2Cr2O7 with CRM Ilmenite or CRM Titanium Slag – H |
2 | Volume of K2Cr2O7 used for titration – \(V_{EQ}\) |
3 | Repeatability – P |
- 10. :
-
Prepare your Uncertainty Budget Report
Ilmenite:
-
(53.7 ± 0.40) % TiO2 (k = 2)*
-
(30.6 ± 0.37) % Fe-tot (k = 2)*
Titanium Slag:
-
(78.4 ± 0.42) % TiO2 (k = 2)*
-
(6.3 ± 0.18) % Fe-tot (k = 2)*
*The reported uncertainty is expanded uncertainty calculated using a coverage factor of k = 2, which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95%.
Addendum I. Measurement Uncertainty Calculation
ILMENITE | TITANIUM SLAG | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TiO 2 | Fe-tot | TiO 2 | Fe-tot | |||||||||
Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | |
P [%] | – | 0.068 | 0.00127 | – | 0.064 | 0.00209 | – | 0.066 | 0.00084 | – | 0.030 | 0.00476 |
V 100 [mL] | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 |
V 500 [mL] | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 |
m s [g] | 0.5101 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 | 0.5101 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 | 0.5050 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 | 0.5050 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 |
H [g/mL] | 0.009585 | 0.0000298 | 0.00311 | 0.006835 | 0.0000360 | 0.00527 | 0.004862 | 0.0000105 | 0.00216 | 0.003480 | 0.0000344 | 0.00989 |
V EX + V EQ [mL] | 5.7155 | 0.00836 | 0.00146 | 4.5732 | 0.00836 | 0.00183 | 16.2883 | 0.0174 | 0.00107 | 1.8276 | 0.0163 | 0.00892 |
W [%] | 53.70 | 0.20 | 0.00373 | 30.64 | 0.18 | 0.00600 | 78.41 | 0.21 | 0.00265 | 6.30 | 0.089 | 0.0142 |
U | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.18 | ||||||||
ri [%] | ri [%] | ri [%] | ri [%] | |||||||||
P | 11.53 | 12.14 | 10.10 | 11.32 | ||||||||
V (100) | 1.72 | 0.67 | 3.41 | 0.12 | ||||||||
V (500) | 1.25 | 0.48 | 2.48 | 0.09 | ||||||||
m (s) | 0.62 | 0.24 | 1.26 | 0.04 | ||||||||
H | 69.50 | 77.18 | 66.48 | 48.75 | ||||||||
V (EX) + V (EQ) | 15.38 | 9.30 | 16.27 | 39.68 | ||||||||
W | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
H8 | H9 | H11 | H12 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | Value | u | u rel | |
V 100 [mL] | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 | 100 | 0.0489 | 0.00049 |
V 500 [mL] | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 | 500 | 0.2086 | 0.00042 |
m CRM [g] | 0.5088 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 | 0.5088 | 0.00015 | 0.00029 | 0.5054 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 | 0.5054 | 0.00015 | 0.00030 |
V EX + V EQ [mL] | 5.1810 | 0.00836 | 0.00161 | 5.2405 | 0.00836 | 0.00160 | 17.4827 | 0.0174 | 0.00100 | 1.9490 | 0.0163 | 0.00836 |
W CRM [%] | 48.8 | 0.125 | 0.00256 | 35.2 | 0.175 | 0.00497 | 84.1 | 0.150 | 0.00178 | 6.71 | 0.035 | 0.00522 |
H [g/mL] | 0.009585 | 0.0000298 | 0.00311 | 0.006835 | 0.0000360 | 0.00527 | 0.004862 | 0.0000105 | 0.00216 | 0.003480 | 0.0000344 | 0.00988 |
ri [%] | ri [%] | ri [%] | ri [%] | |||||||||
V (100) | 2.47 | 0.86 | 5.12 | 0.24 | ||||||||
V (500) | 1.80 | 0.63 | 3.72 | 0.18 | ||||||||
m (CRM) | 0.90 | 0.31 | 1.89 | 0.09 | ||||||||
V (EX) + V (EQ) | 26.94 | 9.17 | 21.20 | 71.63 | ||||||||
W (CRM) | 67.89 | 89.03 | 68.08 | 27.86 | ||||||||
H | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pustinek, J., Kanduč, K.R., Hrastelj, N. (2019). Task for a Laboratory Measurement of Mass Fraction of TiO2 and Fe-tot in Ilmenite and Titanium Slag. In: Hrastelj, N., Bettencourt da Silva, R. (eds) Traceability, Validation and Measurement Uncertainty in Chemistry: Vol. 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20347-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20347-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20346-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20347-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)