Skip to main content

Sociology, a Work in Progress?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Has Sociology Progressed?

Abstract

Deciding whether an academic discipline has progressed is not easy, while gaining a reputation for oneself and helping the discipline to progress do not seem to be closely related. Many obstacles have prevented sociology from progressing, some of which are beyond the control of sociologists: but many are not. Indeed, if no progress has been made, it is largely because few sociologists have set themselves this goal. Many have given priority to their personal interests rather than tackle difficult theoretical questions, while there has been a tendency to confuse studying social life with adding to sociological understanding. But progress was made in the past (why otherwise would we study the works of Durkheim, Marx and Weber), and so—if more favourable circumstances were to come to pass—there is no reason why this could not happen in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Abbott’s contention that cumulation occurs “within paradigms” but that no paradigm gains universal acceptance as they are generally seen as “too insular” (2006, p. 61).

  2. 2.

    It is possible that there are sociologists who have succeeded in convincing themselves that, in studying topics that interest them, even though no significant theoretical puzzle is involved, they are nonetheless contributing to the advancement of the discipline. To the extent that they believe this to be the case, they could be said to be suffering from false consciousness.

  3. 3.

    See also in this respect Max Steuer’s suggestion that sociology—along with related disciplines—could be dubbed “pretend social science” (2003, p. 424).

  4. 4.

    I do recognize that fame and immortality are hardly synonyms. I am simply assuming that the desire for fame is in effect a desire for one’s name to live on for a period after one’s death, not that it will live forever.

Bibliography

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2006, Summer). Reconceptualizing Knowledge Accumulation in Sociology. The American Sociologist, 37, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvan, M. (2014, March 21). “There Is No Progress in Philosophy”…Or Is There? The Philosopher’s Cocoon. http://philosopherscocoon.typepad.com/blog/2014/04/there-is-no-progress-in-philosophy.html. Accessed 12 December 2018.

  • Back, L. (2016). Academic Diary: Or Why Higher Education Still Matters. London: Goldsmiths Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1985). Introduction: Has Economic Theory Progressed? In Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1994). Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress Like the Natural Sciences. Sociological Forum, 9(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1994). What’s Wrong with Sociology? Sociological Forum, 9(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, E. (2011). There Is No Progress in Philosophy. Essays in Philosophy, 12(2), 329–344 (Article 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. M. (1966). Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, E. L. (1995). Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies. History of Political Economy, 27(1), 43–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., Smelser, N., & Gerstein, D. (Eds.). (1989). Leading in Social and Behavioral Science. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. (1971). The Degradation of the Academic Dogma: The University in America 1945–1970. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. (2000, May 1). Evolutionary Progress? BioScience, 50(5), 451–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SI News. (2018, September 26). The World University Rankings 2019: Asia Cashes in on UK Decline. http://www.studyinternational.com/news/the-world-university-rankings-2019-asia-cashes-in-on-uk-decline/. Accessed 12 December 2018.

  • Steuer, M. (2003). The Scientific Study of Society. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Campbell, C. (2019). Sociology, a Work in Progress?. In: Has Sociology Progressed?. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19978-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19978-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19977-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19978-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics