Skip to main content
  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

The South African economy has been growing at a slow pace since the onset of financial crisis in 2007. The economy experienced recessions in the 2009Q1–2009Q3 and 2018Q1–2018Q2 periods. The weak and volatile economic growth does not lead to high job creation. In addition, the subdued growth will not contribute in reducing high unemployment, high income inequality, and may exacerbates other socio-economic imbalances. Given this context the South African policymakers have pointed out in several occasions the need for structural reforms to grow the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The book delves in these issues and shows that policymakers did not indicate the possible existence of the policy ineffectiveness theory nor did they indicate whether policy ineffectiveness could be dependent on whether inflation is above or below the current threshold of six per cent. It is possible that monetary policy may be a conduit in transmitting shocks to income inequality and be a driver of income inequality. The effectiveness of monetary policy may become distorted by income inequality. These are examined in detail in the book from various angles. The policy ineffectiveness theory suggests that demand management policies are ineffective. In this setting, new classical economics suggests that policy interventions should not exist because inflation is costlier than unemployment. In addition, the short-run Philips curve is very steep, and the economy is self-correcting, and this works smoothly and quickly. In contrast, the new Keynesian theory suggests that policy interventions are needed, because unemployment is costlier than inflation. In this case, the Philips curve is flat. However, the self-correcting mechanism is rather slow and unreliable. Does the theory of policy ineffectiveness hold in South Africa and is this constrained by inflation regimes?

  2. 2.

    Some channels through which inequality leads to adverse economic reaction include increased leveraging and financial cycle, which precipitate financial crises (Rajan 2011).

  3. 3.

    However, other justifications have been pointed out in the literature. Theory suggests that inflation has direct effects on income inequality through various channels, including changes in real valuation of financial and nonfinancial assets (Bulir 2001). Whereas Romer and Romer (1999) put forward that high inflation can create expectations of future macroeconomic instability and lead to distortionary economic policies which may impact on inequality.

  4. 4.

    The findings in this empirical undertaking should not be viewed as advocating for monetary policy to be used to solve income inequality problems in South Africa.

  5. 5.

    During a period of high inflation, prices are less rigid.

  6. 6.

    The new classical economics suggests that policy intervention should not exist because inflation is costlier than unemployment; the short-run Philips curve is very steep; and the economy is self-correcting and it works smoothly and quickly. In contrast, the new Keynesian theory suggests that policy interventions, because unemployment is costlier than inflation, the Philips curve is flat, and that the self-correcting mechanism is rather slow and unreliable.

  7. 7.

    Their work differed from that of Ball et al. (1988) by allowing for differential effects of monetary policy and government spending. They test the new Keynesian proposition that sticky prices increase the effects of government spending and monetary policy on gross national product. They found little evidence of the new Keynesian sticky price model.

  8. 8.

    Bernanke (1983).

  9. 9.

    Excess capital adequacy ratio above minimum required.

References

  • Ball, L., Makiw, G., & Romer, D. (1988). The new Keynesian economics and output-inflation trade-off. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, C., Caglayan, M., & Ozkan, N. (2002). The impact of macroeconomic uncertainty on bank lending behavior (Computing in Economics and Finance, No. 94). Liverpool: University of Liverpool Management School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 77(3), 623–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulir, A. (2001). Income inequality: Does inflation matter? IMF Staff Papers, 48(11), 1–5. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2016, June 30). Uncertainty, the economy and policy. Speech by Mr Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England and Chairman of the Financial Stability Board, at the Bank of England, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, Q., & Li, W. (2017). Economic policy uncertainty, credit risks and banks’ lending decisions: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2009). Finance and inequality: Theory and evidence. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1, 287–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoli, F., & Robles, A. (2017). Inequality overhang (IMF Working Paper, 17/76). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, H.J., Park, H., & Zhao, G. (2017). Uncertainty and the value of cash holding. Economic Letters, Issue 55, 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A., & Wang, X. (2014). Financial sector policies and income inequality. China Economic Review, 31, 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1957). A model of economic growth. The Economic Journal, 67(268), 591–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiley, M. (2000). Endogenous price stickiness and business cycle persistence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32(1), 28–53. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelln, K., Rush, M., & Waldo, D. (1996). Do government multipliers decrease with inflation? Journal of Monetary Policy, 38(3), 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, H. (2003). Macroeconomics and inequality (The World Bank [PRMPR]). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnin, P. (2017). Monetary policy, macroprudential regulation and inequality. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2970459 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2970459.

  • Ndou, E., Gumata, N., & Ncube, M. (2018). Exchange rate shocks and global economic uncertainities: Transmission channels into South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, C., Holsher, J., & Collie, S. (2016). Inequality, credit and financial crises. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(1), 227–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. (2011). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, C.D., & Romer, D. (1999). Monetary policy and well-being of the poor. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (first quarter), 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2015). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voinea, L., & Monnin, P. (2017). Inequality should matter for central banks.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2018, March). Overcoming poverty and inequality in South Africa: An assessment of drivers, constraints and opportunities.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ndou, E., Mokoena, T. (2019). Introduction. In: Inequality, Output-Inflation Trade-Off and Economic Policy Uncertainty . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19803-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19803-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19802-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19803-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics