Abstract
This chapter explores the implementation of Design Thinking practices in large organisations. Establishing exploration spaces as well as hunting and gathering for insights set up the process of innovation. Yet, innovation also needs an effective set of practices for leveraging diversity of design teams to transform insights into innovation. Specifically, the chapter looks at the extent to which the implementation of Design Thinking has created spaces in large organisations that are or approximate ‘messy institutions’ (Ney and Verweij Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1679–1696, 2015). These are organisational spaces that put problem-solving methods from different and often contending organisational cultures at the disposal of design teams. The chapter shows how output-oriented practices move the process of innovation by encouraging pragmatism and experimentation. Inclusion-oriented processes ensure that all voices and approaches—even the outliers and extreme users—get a fair hearing in the innovation process. Process-oriented practices, in turn, provide the rules that enable the process to stay on track and produce high outputs based on the best available knowledge. Last chance-oriented practices introduce an element of serendipity designed to accustom Design Thinking teams to failure. Using case studies of large organisations that have introduced Design Thinking, the chapter critically scrutinises the extent to which plurality of practices has supported and promoted the creative reframing of wicked problems. Just like the previous two chapters, we outline the critical lessons learned from implementing the pluralist practices in large organisations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Arguably, the fourfold typology of organisational cultures is the fundamental ideal-typical model in this exposition. Just as we use this model to calibrate and analyse practices in the schools of design thinking, we will use the articulation of the four sets of cultural practices in d.schools to make sense of design thinking initiatives in large organisations.
References
6, P. (2003). Institutional viability: A neo-Durkheimian approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science, 16(4), 395–415.
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.
Buck, J. A., & Villines, S. (2007). We the people: Consenting to a deeper democracy: A guide to sociocratic principles and methods. Washington, DC: Sociocracy.info.
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2012). Implementing design thinking in large organizations. Proceedings of the IPDM Conference 2012, Manchaster.
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014a). Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 403–423.
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014b). Exploring the use of design thinking in large organizations: Towards a research agenda. Swedish Design Research Journal, 1(14), 47–56.
Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2016). The challenges of using design thinking in industry – Experiences from five large firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(3), 344–362.
Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organisational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–17.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
De Bono, E. (1989). Six thinking hats. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Doorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2011). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Douglas, M., & Ney, S. (1998). Missing persons: A critique of personhood in the social sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dribbisch, K. (2016). Translating innovation: The adoption of design thinking in a Singaporean Ministry.
Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation. London: Profile Books.
Köppen, E. (2016). Empathy by design: Untersuchung einer Empathie-geleiteten Reorganisation der Arbeitsweise. Konstanz und München: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
Löffler, J. (2015, September 1). Unser Unternehmen ist eine Soziokratie. Der Freitag.
Martin, R. L. (2009a). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Martin, R. L. (2009b). The opposable mind: Winning through integrative thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Ney, S. (2012). Making sense of the global health crisis: Policy narratives, conflict, and global health governance. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 37(2), 253–295.
Ney, S., & Verweij, M. (2014a). Exploring the contributions of cultural theory for improving public deliberation about complex policy problems. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 620–643.
Ney, S., & Verweij, M. (2014b). Messy institutions for wicked problems: How to generate clumsy solutions. Available at SSRN 2382191.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. J. (2014). Design thinking research: Building innovators. Cham: Springer.
Rhinow, H. (2018). Design thinking Als Lernprozess in Organisationen: Neue Chancen Und Dilemmata Für Die Projektarbeit. Doctoral thesis, University of Potsdam, Potsdam.
Stickdorn, M. (2012). This is service design thinking: Basics-tools-cases. Amsterdam: BIS.
Suri, J. F. (2005). Thoughtless acts?: Observations on intuitive design. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle books.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ney, S., Meinel, C. (2019). Design Thinking and Messy Practices. In: Putting Design Thinking to Work. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19609-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19609-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19608-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19609-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)