Abstract
A growing number of urban health impact studies use Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models for air pollution exposure estimation, although the performance of CMAQ models is likely to be affected by multiple parameters, including the configuration setting of the study domain. We presented an approach for CMAQ model uncertainty assessment with respect to domain size and reported spatial and temporal variations of CMAQ model performance over two study domains, a relatively small domain (DS) and a large domain (DL). Specifically, we simulated daily PM2.5 concentrations over two domains during 2011 and quantified the difference between the model predictions. The model performance was assessed by comparing modeled PM2.5 against measured PM2.5 values at monitoring sites located in the region of overlap for each domain. The results suggest that the CMAQ simulations over two domains were in good agreement across the study area except in southwestern areas. We also found that the overall model performance was better for CMAQ simulations with a large domain relative to the smaller domain. Based on our findings, we recommend applying a large domain for PM2.5 simulations, particularly for urban health risk assessments conducted over summer months, which generally contain more emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAbbreviations
- AQS:
-
Air Quality System
- BCs:
-
Boundary conditions
- CMAQ:
-
Community Multiscale Air Quality
- EPA:
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- FB:
-
Fractional bias
- FE:
-
Fractional error
- NEI:
-
National Emission Inventory
- NYC:
-
New York City
- PM2.5:
-
Fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm
- SMOKE:
-
Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emission
- WRF:
-
Weather Research and Forecasting
References
Adams, K., Greenbaum, D. S., Shaikh, R., van Erp, A. M., & Russell, A. G. (2015). Particulate matter components, sources, and health: Systematic approaches to testing effects. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(5), 544–558.
Appel, K. W., Foley, K., Bash, J., Pinder, R., Dennis, R., Allen, D., & Pickering, K. (2011). A multi-resolution assessment of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v4. 7 wet deposition estimates for 2002–2006. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(2), 357.
Appel, K. W., Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Pye, H. O., Hogrefe, C., Luecken, D. J., ... & Hutzell, W. T. (2017). Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(4), 1703–1732.
Barna, M. G., & Knipping, E. M. (2006). Insights from the BRAVO study on nesting global models to specify boundary conditions in regional air quality modeling simulations. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 574–582.
Baxter, L. K., Dionisio, K. L., Burke, J., Sarnat, S. E., Sarnat, J. A., Hodas, N., ... & Kumar, N. (2013). Exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies: Key findings and future recommendations. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 23(6), 654.
Beddows, A. V., Kitwiroon, N., Williams, M. L., & Beevers, S. D. (2017). Emulation and sensitivity analysis of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model for a UK ozone pollution episode. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(11), 6229–6236.
Bell, M. L., Ebisu, K., Peng, R. D., Walker, J., Samet, J. M., Zeger, S. L., & Dominici, F. (2008). Seasonal and regional short-term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 202 US counties, 1999–2005. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(11), 1301–1310.
Borge, R., López, J., Lumbreras, J., Narros, A., & Rodríguez, E. (2010). Influence of boundary conditions on CMAQ simulations over the Iberian Peninsula. Atmospheric Environment, 44(23), 2681–2695.
Boylan, J. W., & Russell, A. G. (2006). PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmospheric Environment, 40(26), 4946–4959.
Bravo, M. A., Fuentes, M., Zhang, Y., Burr, M. J., & Bell, M. L. (2012). Comparison of exposure estimation methods for air pollutants: Ambient monitoring data and regional air quality simulation. Environmental Research, 116, 1–10.
Bravo, M. A., Ebisu, K., Dominici, F., Wang, Y., Peng, R. D., & Bell, M. L. (2016). Airborne fine particles and risk of hospital admissions for understudied populations: Effects by urbanicity and short-term cumulative exposures in 708 U.S. counties. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(4), 594–601.
Burr, M. J., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Source apportionment of fine particulate matter over the Eastern US Part I: Source sensitivity simulations using CMAQ with the Brute Force method. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2(3), 300–317.
Byun, D., & Schere, K. L. (2006). Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59(2), 51–77.
Cefalu, M., & Dominici, F. (2014). Does exposure prediction bias health effect estimation? The relationship between confounding adjustment and exposure prediction. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 25(4), 583.
CMAQ version 5.0 (February 2010 release) OGD. (2015, December 4). CMASWIKI, Retrieved 14:35, May 5, 2019 from https://www.airqualitymodeling.org/index.php?title=CMAQ_version_5.0_(February_2010_release)_OGD&oldid=682.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
Dockery, D. W. (2009). Health effects of particulate air pollution. Annuals of Epidemiology, 19(4), 257–263.
Du, Y., Xu, X., Chu, M., Guo, Y., & Wang, J. (2016). Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: The epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(1), E8.
Ebisu, K., & Bell, M. L. (2012). Airborne PM2.5 chemical components and low birth weight in the northeastern and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1746.
EPA. (2014). Modeling guidance for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze-December 2014 DRAFT. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/Draft_O3-PM-RH_Modeling_Guidance-2014.pdf.
Eyth, A., & Vukovich, J. (2016). Technical Support Document (TSD) preparation of emissions inventories for the version 6.3, 2011 emissions modeling platform. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185–201.
Fountoukis, C., Koraj, D., van der Gon, H. D., Charalampidis, P., Pilinis, C., & Pandis, S. (2013). Impact of grid resolution on the predicted fine PM by a regional 3-D chemical transport model. Atmospheric Environment, 68, 24–32.
Gentner, D. R., Jathar, S. H., Gordon, T. D., Bahreini, R., Day, D. A., El Haddad, I., ... & Goldstein, A. H. (2017). Review of urban secondary organic aerosol formation from gasoline and diesel motor vehicle emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(3), 1074–1093.
Griffith, D. A. (1980). Towards a theory of spatial statistics. Geographical Analysis, 12(4), 325–339.
Griffith, D. A., & Amrhein, C. G. (1983). An evaluation of correction techniques for boundary effects in spatial statistical analysis: Traditional methods. Geographical Analysis, 15(4), 352–360.
Hoek, G., Krishnan, R. M., Beelen, R., Peters, A., Ostro, B., Brunekreef, B., & Kaufman, J. D. (2013). Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: A review. Environmental Health, 12(1), 43.
Hogrefe, C., Liu, P., Pouliot, G., Mathur, R., Roselle, S., Flemming, J., Lin, M., & Park, R. J. (2018). Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(5), 3839.
Hu, J., Li, X., Huang, L., Qi, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, B., Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2017). Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(21), 13103.
Jiang, X., & Yoo, E.-h. (2018). The importance of spatial resolutions of Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models on health impact assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1528–1543.
Jiménez, P., Parra, R., & Baldasano, J. M. (2007). Influence of initial and boundary conditions for ozone modeling in very complex terrains: A case study in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(9), 1294–1306.
Karambelas, A., Holloway, T., Kinney, P. L., Fiore, A. M., DeFries, R., Kiesewetter, G., & Heyes, C. (2018). Urban versus rural health impacts attributable to PM2.5 and O3 in northern India. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 064010.
Kloog, I., Ridgway, B., Koutrakis, P., Coull, B. A., & Schwartz, J. D. (2013). Long- and short-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality: Using novel exposure models. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24(4), 555.
Krall, J. R., Chang, H. H., Sarnat, S. E., Peng, R. D., & Waller, L. A. (2015). Current methods and challenges for epidemiological studies of the associations between chemical constituents of particulate matter and health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2(4), 388–398.
Lee, P., Kang, D., McQueen, J., Tsidulko, M., Hart, M., DiMego, G., Seaman, N., & Davidson, P. (2008). Impact of domain size on modeled ozone forecast for the northeastern United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(2), 443–461.
Lee, H., Liu, Y., Coull, B., Schwartz, J., & Koutrakis, P. (2011). A novel calibration approach of MODIS AOD data to predict PM2.5 concentrations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(15), 7991–8002.
Lee, D., Wang, J., Jiang, X., Lee, Y., & Jang, K. (2012). Comparison between atmospheric chemistry model and observations utilizing the RAQMS–CMAQ linkage. Atmospheric Environment, 61, 85–93.
Makar, P. A., Gong, W., Mooney, C., Zhang, J., Davignon, D., Samaali, M., ... & Chen, J. (2010). Dynamic adjustment of climatological ozone boundary conditions for air-quality forecasts. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(18), 8997–9015.
Mancilla, Y., Herckes, P., Fraser, M. P., & Mendoza, A. (2015). Secondary organic aerosol contributions to PM2.5 in Monterrey, Mexico: Temporal and seasonal variation. Atmospheric Research, 153, 348–359.
McGuinn, L. A., Ward-Caviness, C., Neas, L. M., Schneider, A., Di, Q., Chudnovsky, A., ... & Kraus, W. E. (2017). Fine particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: Comparison of assessment methods for long-term exposure. Environmental Research, 159, 16–23.
Morris, R. E., McNally, D. E., Tesche, T. W., Tonnesen, G., Boylan, J. W., & Brewer, P. (2005). Preliminary evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality model for 2002 over the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 55(11), 1694–1708.
Murray, N., Chang, H. H., Holmes, H., & Liu, Y. (2018). Combining satellite imagery and numerical model simulation to estimate ambient air pollution: An ensemble averaging approach. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1802.03077.
Nolte, C., Appel, K., Kelly, J., Bhave, P., Fahey, K., Collett, J., Jr., Zhang, L., & Young, J. (2015). Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5. 0 against size-resolved measurements of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(9), 2877–2892.
Özkaynak, H., Baxter, L. K., Dionisio, K. L., & Burke, J. (2013). Air pollution exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 23(6), 566–572.
Pour-Biazar, A., Khan, M., Wang, L., Park, Y.-H., Newchurch, M., McNider, R. T., Liu, X., Byun, D. W., & Cameron, R. (2011). Utilization of satellite observation of ozone and aerosols in providing initial and boundary condition for regional air quality studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D18).
Queen, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Examining the sensitivity of MM5–CMAQ predictions to explicit microphysics schemes and horizontal grid resolutions, Part III–The impact of horizontal grid resolution. Atmospheric Environment, 42(16), 3869–3881.
Reyes, J. M., Xu, Y., Vizuete, W., & Serre, M. L. (2017). Regionalized PM2.5 Community Multiscale Air Quality model performance evaluation across a continuous spatiotemporal domain. Atmospheric Environment, 148, 258–265.
Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial statistics. New York: Wiley.
Roy, B., Mathur, R., Gilliland, A. B., & Howard, S. C. (2007). A comparison of CMAQ-based aerosol properties with IMPROVE, MODIS, and AERONET data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, (D14), 112.
Samaali, M., Moran, M. D., Bouchet, V. S., Pavlovic, R., Cousineau, S., & Sassi, M. (2009). On the influence of chemical initial and boundary conditions on annual regional air quality model simulations for North America. Atmospheric Environment, 43(32), 4873–4885.
Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2016). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change. Wiley.
Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., Thongboonchoo, N., Chai, T., Horowitz, L. W., Pierce, R. B., ... & Sachse, G. W. (2007). Influence of lateral and top boundary conditions on regional air quality prediction: A multiscale study coupling regional and global chemical transport models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112(D10).
Tang, Y., Lee, P., Tsidulko, M., Huang, H. C., McQueen, J. T., DiMego, G. J., ... & Kang, D. (2009). The impact of chemical lateral boundary conditions on CMAQ predictions of tropospheric ozone over the continental United States. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 9(1), 43–58.
Wang, C., Tu, Y., Yu, Z., & Lu, R. (2015). PM2.5 and cardiovascular disease in the elderly: An overview. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(7), 8187–8197.
Wang, W., Barker, D., Bray, J., Bruyere, C., Duda, M., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., & Michalakes, J. (2016). User’s guide for the Advanced Research WRF (ARW) modeling system version 3.7. http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/user_guide_V3.7/ARWUsersGuideV3.7.pdf.
Warner, T. T., Peterson, R. A., & Treadon, R. E. (1997). A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potentially serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(11), 2599–2617.
Weber, S. A., Insaf, T. Z., Hall, E. S., Talbot, T. O., & Huff, A. K. (2016). Assessing the impact of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory-cardiovascular chronic diseases in the New York City Metropolitan area using Hierarchical Bayesian Model estimates. Environmental Research, 151, 399–409.
Xiao, Q., Liu, Y., Mulholland, J. A., Russell, A. G., Darrow, L. A., Tolbert, P. E., & Strickland, M. J. (2016). Pediatric emergency department visits and ambient air pollution in the US State of Georgia: A case-crossover study. Environmental Health, 15(1), 115.
Xing, Y.-F., Xu, Y.-H., Shi, M.-H., & Lian, Y.-X. (2016). The impact of PM2.5. On the human respiratory system. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 8(1), E69.
Yoo, E.-H., & Kyriakidis, P. (2008). Area-to-point prediction under boundary conditions. Geographical Analysis, 40(4), 355–379.
Zhang, H., Chen, G., Hu, J., Chen, S.-H., Wiedinmyer, C., Kleeman, M., & Ying, Q. (2014). Evaluation of a seven-year air quality simulation using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models in the eastern United States. Science of the Total Environment, 473, 275–285.
Zhu, X. (2016). GIS for environmental applications: A practical approach. Routledge.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank for the support provided by the Center for Computational Research (CCR) as well as the seed grant from University at Buffalo’s Research and Education in Energy, Environment & Water (RENEW) Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, X., Yoo, EH. (2020). Evaluating the Effect of Domain Size of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model on Regional PM2.5 Simulations. In: Lu, Y., Delmelle, E. (eds) Geospatial Technologies for Urban Health. Global Perspectives on Health Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19573-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19573-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19572-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19573-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)