Skip to main content

The Decadent Deep Sea: Jules Laforgue’s “At the Berlin Aquarium”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Artist as Animal in Nineteenth-Century French Literature

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

Abstract

In “At the Berlin Aquarium” (1895) and “Impressionism” (1883), poet Jules Laforgue (1860–1887) reinterprets Darwinian science to affirmative of the possibility of an avant-garde revolution in perception, which is similar to the ways in which animals see. According to the poet, the physical eye of Impressionist artist can be liberated from the constraints of human thought. However, in Laforgue’s poem, this transcendent experience occurs within a city aquarium. The aquarium represents freedom for Laforgue because it is perceived as an escape from Western urban society. Nettleton thus also discusses the cultural interest in the Japanese paintings of the “Floating World” during the nineteenth century. Through an examination of aquatic literature of the period paired with contemporary zoo studies (Rothfels, Malamud), Nettleton illustrates the ways in which aquariums represented a new role for art to dive into the very origins of the human experience—within a glass enclosure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cuvier is discussed in the section Fureur geneisque de l’art in Impressionisme. Laforgue argued that a transcendent force pushed “Cuvier to reconstitute fossils,” which I will discuss later in this chapter (147). In terms of the debate between Cuvier and Saint-Hilaire, Laforgue is obviously on the side of transformism, arguing that a Lamarckian vital force caused Cuvier’s research. Laforgue’s correspondence with Théodore Lindenlaub mentions Lohengrin, most probably referring to Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire’s article “La première de Lohnengrin” on February 15th.

  2. 2.

    As we will examine later in this chapter, Laforgue constructs a dichotomy between two different types of humans who are evolving in different ways, the impressionist versus the academic. In “Le Miracle des Roses,” Laforgue quotes Darwin’s study of two types of touch-me-not plants, adding, “The other sowed by sensitive ones behaved in a different manner/L’autre semis de Sensitives se comporta d’une manière un peu différente” (1986c, 586). For Laforgue, the avant-gardist is a sensitive soul that behaves and functions differently from others. The quote is found in Darwin’s lesser-known book The Power of Movement in Plants (1880). The French translation is quoted in Laforgue’s epigraph for “Le Miracle des Roses” in Molarités légendaires (published posthumously in 1920).

  3. 3.

    “And the Obscene Mysteries of Cybele/Et les mystères Obscènes de Cybèle” (Laforgue 1986a, 606). The last line of the poem was not included in the 1903 edition of the poem.

  4. 4.

    In the Book of Revelation, the riders of the Four Horses of the Apocalypse represent conquest, war, famine or death—the end of humanity as we know it. The term “apocalypse” in ancient Greek means “an uncovering,” typically an understanding of divine secrets that can help one comprehend earthy realities.

  5. 5.

    One should note the lexical field of “naturally” and “naïvely” and “natural,” which can be defined as “that which has not be made, modified or altered by man.” “Qui n’a pas été fabriqué, modifié, traité par l’homme” (Le Grand Robert, 876).

  6. 6.

    Critics of Darwin have used the topic of the eye for centuries to combat his theory of evolution. One of their arguments is that an eye of a vertebrate is too complex to have evolved from Darwinian natural selection. Creationists argue that the eye could not have appeared by slight variations and developments over the course of millions of years. Darwin himself understood the skepticism about this idea. Darwin wrote in chapter six of The Origin of Species, “To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree” (337). However, Darwin did believe that the eye could have developed by numerous, slight modifications because even single-celled organisms contain parts of their cells that are sensitive to light, and these parts could have evolved into eyes (Johnson, 22).

  7. 7.

    “Description is the work of a brain which comprehends the things it perceives in their connection and their essence; Impressionism is the work of a brain which receives from the phenomenon only the sensuous elements and by a one-sided aspect of knowledge, but not knowledge itself. The describer recognizes in a tree, a tree, with all the ideas which this concept includes. The Impressionist sees before him merely a mass of colour composed of spots of different greens, on which the sun flashes here and there points and rays of light” (Nordau 1968, 487).

  8. 8.

    Uexküll tells a story of Helmholtz’s childhood: He and his mother passed by a church bell tower with men working on the roof. Helmholtz asked his mother if she could take the dolls down from the roof for him. Because the men on the roof were distant, the child perceived them as small people. However, he lacked the knowledge that objects appear smaller the farther away they are. “The infant’s visual space ends here with an all encompassing farthest plane. Only bit by bit do we learn to push the farthest plane even farther with the help of distance signs until the adults’ visual space ends at a distance of six to eight kilometers and the horizon begins” (Uexküll, loc 638). Distance perception is thus learned, not innate, and our experiential knowledge alters how and what we see.

  9. 9.

    The last line in the 1895 edition of the poem, “And the obscene mysteries of Cybele” (Laforgue 1986a, 606), also suggests the return to a spiritual, pre-Christian source. Cybele was an Anatolian mother goddess described by the Greek poet Hesiod in the eighth century BC (Roller 1999, 10). Lynn Roller argues that this mother goddess was one of the earliest concepts of the divine and was a fundamental part of human development (1999, 10). The religious imagery suggests an alternative, heavenly reality that could be a refuge from modern city life. It is also yet another means of destroying previous, antiquated thought processes in order to enter into the new.

  10. 10.

    “my faith, making an existence there again, of stumps whose antennae blink with the coral in front of it, of a thousand endless warts; a whole fetal and claustral flora, waving the eternal dream of being able to whisper one day to mutual congratulations on this state of affairs/ma foi, s’y refaisant une existence, de moignons dont les antennes clignent au corail d’en face, de mille verrues sans but; toute une flore foetale et claustrale et vibratile, agitant l’éternel rêve d’arriver à se chuchoter un jour de mutuelles félicitations sur cet état de choses” (Laforgue 1986c, 438).

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airhart, Chad Wesley. A Journey to Physical Painting. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloi, Giovanni. Art and Animals. London: I.B. Tauris, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancel, Nicolas, Pascal Blanchard, et al. Zoos humains. Paris: La Découverte, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belot, Françoise. Figures of Degeneration in Fin-de-Siècle French Literature. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, John. “Why Look at Animals?” About Looking. New York: Pantheon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouaniche, Arnaud. Gilles Deleuze, une introduction. Paris: Poche, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourget, Paul. Le Disciple. Paris: Nelson, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Irus. Zooland: The Institution of Captivity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capriles, Elias. Buddhism and Dzogchen Buddhism: A Dzogchen Outlook I. Victoria, Spain: La Llave, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man. London: John Murray, 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. From so Simple a Beginning: Darwin’s Four Great Books (Voyage of the Beagle, The Origin of Species, The Descent of Man, The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals), edited by Edward O. Wilson. New York: W.W. Norton, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Origin of Species: A Variorum Text. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Translated by Daniel Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Kafka pour une littérature mineure. Paris: Les éditions de minuit, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Mille plateaux. Paris: Les éditions de minuit, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie. Paris: Les éditions de minuit, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Claire Parnet. L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze. Interview, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. Trans. David Wills. The Animal that Therefore I Am, edited by Marie-Louise Mallet. New York: Fordham University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dottin-Orsini, Mireille. “Préface”. In Jules Laforgue: Textes de Critique d’art, by Jules Laforgue, edited by Mireille Dottin-Orsini. Presses Universitaires De Lille, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, Médéric. Une philosophie de l’Impressionnisme: Étude sur l’esthétique de Jules Laforgue. Paris: Librairie Léon Vanier, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea, ed. The Encyclopedia of Religion. New York: Macmillan, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, Stanley Smyth. Report on Mission to Europe. Gizeh Zoological Gardens. National Printing Department, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamwell, Lynn. Exploring the Invisible. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancocks, David. A Different Nature: The Paradoxical World of Zoos and Their Uncertain Future. Oakland: University of California, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs and Women – The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, Hermann von. Treatise on Physiological Optics 1–3. Translated by J.P.C. Southall. Rochester, New York: The Optical Society of America, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. Guide pittoresque au Jardin des plantes. Paris: Imprimerie serrière, 1851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinson, Tom E. The Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art. Cleveland: Cleveland Museum of Art, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J.-K. “L’Aquarium de Berlin.” In Œuvres complètes XV–XVI. Geneva: Stakine, 1972a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “À Rebours.” In Oeuvres complètes XV–XVI. Geneva: Stakine, 1972b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelavich, Peter. Berlin Cabaret. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Norman A. Darwinian Detectives: Revealing the Natural History of Genes and Genomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laforgue, Jules. “À l’Aquarium de Berlin.” In Œuvres complètes III. Lausanne: L’Age d’homme. Paris: Mercure de France, 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “L’impressionnisme.” In Œuvres complètes III. Lausanne: L’Age d’homme. Paris: Mercure de France, 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Salomé.” In Œuvres complètes II. Lausanne: L’Age d’homme. Paris: Mercure de France, 1986c.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Textes de critique d’art, edited by Mireille Dottin-Orsini. Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefrère, Jean-Jacques. Jules Laforgue. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofting, Hugh. The Voyages of Doctor Dolittle. London: Lippincott, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, David. Catching the Big Fish: Meditation, Consciousness, and Creativity. Los Angeles: Tarcher, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi, Akiko. “Japonisme et Naturalisme.” In Japonisme. Tokyo: Musée d’art national occidental, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Randy. Reading Zoos: Representations of Animals and Captivity. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. Animal Stories: Narrating Across Species Lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, Bénédict A. Treaty on Physical, Intellectual and Moral Degeneration of the Human Species. Paris: Masson, 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, James. Deep: Freediving, Renegade Science, and What the Ocean Tells Us About Ourselves. Boston, NY: Mariner, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, Peter. “‘Arid clarity’: Ezra Pound, Mina Loy, and Jules Laforgue.” The Yearbook of English Studies 32 (2002): 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordau, Max Simon. Degeneration. New York: H. Fertig, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, Wilhelm. Pfisters Mühle: Ein Sommerferienheft. Leipzig: Fr. Wilh. Grunow, 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Warren. Jules Laforgue and the Ironic Inheritance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, Ernest. Vie de Jésus. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères, 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbiani, Marina. Degas. London: Bloomsbury, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roller, Lynn E. In Search of God the Mother: The Cult of Anatolian Cybele. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothfels, Nigel. Savages and Beasts: The Birth of the Modern Zoo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentell, Amy Lauren. Spain’s Decadent Dilemma: Science and Art Versus Nature in the Forgotten Novel of the Fin de Siglo. PhD dissertation, University of Virginia, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Eric, et al. Campbell Essential Biology, 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw, Petrine-Archer. Negrophilia. New York: Thames and Hudson, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strehlow, Harro. “Zoological Gardens of Western Europe.” In Zoo and Aquarium History: Ancient Collections to Zoological Gardens, edited by Vernon N. Kisling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyfman, Léon. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck et son époque. Paris: Masson, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, C. Wyville. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the Years 1873–76. Edinburgh: Printed for H.M. Stationery Office, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, Jakob Von. Translated by Joseph O’Neil. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Alan. Nature, Man and Woman. New York: Vintage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettlaufer, Alexandra. “‘Contournée non péniblement mais naïvement’: Laforgue’s Prose blanche.” In Correspondences: Studies in Literature, History and the Arts in Nineteenth-Century France, edited by Keith Busby. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1992. 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nettleton, C. (2019). The Decadent Deep Sea: Jules Laforgue’s “At the Berlin Aquarium”. In: The Artist as Animal in Nineteenth-Century French Literature. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19345-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics