Abstract
Both the slow transition to new technologies and the lack of behavioural changes need explaining. This will only succeed if the many disciplines contributing to behavioural science (sociology, psychology, sociobiology, economics, ethnology, religious studies, history, etc.) are looked at together to form an overarching theory of individual and collective change. On the road to this transformation research, some fundamental methodological problems must be taken into account (see above). The success or failure of the transformation towards more sustainability, which has essentially failed so far, can be explained, like any social condition, in looking at the complex interaction of individuals. Most important for analysing social change are complex interactions of various actors that culminate in vicious circles e.g. of politicians and voters as well as businesses and consumers. The sole emphasis on factors such as political and economic power or the role of consumers leads to abridging analyses. The complex interaction and vicious circles do not arise primarily from a lack of knowledge about sustainability. The relevance of knowledge to behaviour is widely overestimated and it is overlooked that factual knowledge does not prove normative objectives right or wrong.
Important, but sometimes also overestimated, are the factors of self-interest, path dependencies, problems with collective goods, and values – that assume a person who acts consciously and calculatingly throughout. The irrational and unconscious or semi-conscious factors that influence the behaviour of politicians, entrepreneurs, voters/ consumers, lobbyists, media representatives, etc. are constantly overlooked. Such factors are conceptions of normality (not to be mistaken for values) and emotional factors such as convencience, habits, a lack of orientation in spatio-temporal distance, denial, a lack of thinking in complex causalities, dissonance of talking and acting, striving for recognition, etc.
All these factors are reflected within an individual and as a structure; the dispute over supposedly individualistic versus supposedly collectivist approaches to explaining behaviour and change is proving to be of little consequence. Generally speaking, having a look at real-life individuals instead of remaining too abstract, makes the real motives more transparent. The emergence of unsustainability can be seen as a prime example of these diverse motivational factors and conditions of social change.
Diagonally to the motivation factors mentioned above, it can be said that a lack of sustainability is based on a mixture of biological, cultural (including economic, e.g. capitalism-related), biographical and external factors. Findings from sociobiology and brain research can contribute to explaining human behaviour; however, neither their radical rejection nor their overestimation proves to be tenable. However, today, we see a historically unique situation of comprehensive danger to human livelihoods as a particular manifestation of self-interest, conceptions of normality, values, etc. This can only be explained by additional consideration of cultural factors. A special cultural aspect is the genesis of modern economics, natural science and technology in a complex interaction with originally religious, today often secularised values.The objection that people were – so the claim – in reality largely cooperative (or, even more so, altruistic) and only became what they are today through capitalism, proves to be crooked. Such an objection is empirically implausible, and it neglects the – in parts – biological nature of humans. In addition, it mixes the analysis of living conditions of today and the more recent past with living conditions of the Stone Age and forgets that sustainability is not about collaboration in a small group of hunter-gatherers but between billions of people that will never know each other. Furthermore, focussing on (the cultural factor of) capitalism neglects that an economic system consists of complex interactions of managers, workers, trade unions, consumers, politicians setting the framework for economic activities, and people voting these politicians into office.
The findings of happiness research cannot serve as an objection either. They show that people can be happy with different levels of material wealth. However, there is no clear evidence that a change towards sustainability per se makes all people happier; nevertheless, the necessary transformation holds potential for happiness. Despite of all non-sustainable developments, however, the freedom- and wealth-creating effects of capitalist economic activity should not be overlooked. Consequently, social change in general and transformation towards sustainability in particular are only possible through the interaction of different actors and by influencing those motivational factors which can at all be influenced. Self-interested economic-peace-political, ethical and eudaemonistic (luck-related) considerations could certainly motivate a genuine behavioural and technological change towards sustainability. But for this, self-interest calculations need to be reconsidered, values revised, knowledge used more strongly, path dependencies altered, problems with collective goods addressed, and above all conceptions of normality transformed. This requires a variety of activities by different actors, ranging from completely different policy approaches to the (not verbal or only occasional) establishment of a new day-to-day behaviour of people. Because of the interdependencies, one actor alone cannot bring about the sustainability change. Asking for the one and only relevant actor takes the debate to pointless chicken-and-egg games.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In accordance with legal practice, parliamentary, governmental and EU Commission documents as well as laws and judgments are not listed in the bibliography, as they can be found unecquivocally on the basis of the reference given in the continuous text or via the general search engines. The last access date for all internet sources is 31/07/2018.
Bibliography
In accordance with legal practice, parliamentary, governmental and EU Commission documents as well as laws and judgments are not listed in the bibliography, as they can be found unecquivocally on the basis of the reference given in the continuous text or via the general search engines. The last access date for all internet sources is 31/07/2018.
Abson, David/Fischer, Joern/ Leventon, Julia et al.: Leverage points for sustainability transformation, Ambio 2017, pp. 30 et seq.
Acemoglu, Daron/ Robinson, James: Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, London 2012.
Akerlof, G.A./ Shiller, R.J.: Animal Spirits. How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and why it Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton 2009.
Axelrod, Robert: Schema Theory. An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition, American Political Science Review 1973, pp. 1248 et seq.
Bamberg, Sebastian: Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change, Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013, pp. 151 et seq.
Baumeister, Roy/ Tierney, John: Willpower. Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, New York 2011.
Beck, Ulrich: Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt a.M. 1986.
Bedall, Philip: Climate Justice versus Klimaneoliberalismus?, Bielefeld 2014.
Berger, Peter/ Luckmann, Thomas: The social construction of reality, London 1966.
Blackburn, Simon: Ruling Passions, Oxford 1998.
Buchholz, Wolfgang/ Peters, Wolfgang/ Ufert, Aneta: Spielräume für uni- und multilateralen Klimaschutz, ZfU 2014, 326 et seq.
Bussemer, Thymian: Die erregte Republik. Wutbürger und die Macht der Medien, Stuttgart 2011.
Dawkins, Richard: The Selfish Gene, Oxford 1976.
de Lovinfosse, Isabelle: How and Why Do Policies Change? A Comparison of Renewable Electricity Policies in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK, Bruxelles 2008.
Dean, Jeremy: Making Habits, Breaking Habits. How to Make Changes that Stick, London 2013.
Deaton, Angus: The Great Escape. Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, Princeton 2013.
Diamond, Jared: Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail or Suceed, London 2005.
Diamond, Jared: Guns, Germs, and Steel. The Fates of Human Societies, London 1999.
Diekmann, Andreas: Der Mensch – Altruist oder Homo oeconomicus? Ergebnisse experimenteller Spieltheorie zum Altruismus, Forschung und Lehre 2009, 558 f.
Droste-Frank, Bert et al.: Improving Energy Decisions. Towards Better Scientific Policy Advice for a Safe and Secure Future Energy System, Heidelberg 2015.
Easterlin, Richard: Building a Better Theory of WellBeing, in: Bruni, Luigino/ Porta, Pierre Luigi (Ed.): Economics and Happiness – Framing the Analyses, Oxford 2005, pp. 29 et seq.
Ekardt, Felix/ Richter, Cornelia: Ockham, Hobbes und die Geburt der säkularen Normativität, ARSP 2006, pp. 552 et seq.
Ekardt, Felix: Auf der Suche nach dem verlorenen Sinn, ZEIT 19/ 04/ 2018.
Ekardt, Felix: Wir können uns ändern. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel jenseits von Kapitalismuskritik und Revolution, München 2017a.
Ekardt, Felix: Kurzschluss. Wie einfache Wahrheiten die Demokratie untergraben, Berlin 2017b.
Ekardt, Felix: Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit. Ethische, rechtliche, politische und transformative Zugänge – am Beispiel von Klimawandel, Ressourcenknappheit und Welthandel, 3rd ed. (= 2nd ed. der Neuausgabe) Baden-Baden 2016a.
Ekardt, Felix/ Unnerstall, Herwig/ Garske, Beatrice (Ed.): Globalisierung, Freihandel und Umweltschutz in Zeiten von TTIP. Ökonomische, rechtliche und politische Perspektiven, Marburg 2016.
Ekardt, Felix: Umweltschutz durch Zivilrecht – Nachhaltigkeit durch Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht?, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 2016b, pp. 453 et seq.
Ekardt, Felix: Liberalismus, Besitzindividualismus und Handlungstheorie, Leipzig 2003.
Ekardt, Felix: Steuerungsdefizite im Umweltrecht: Ursachen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Naturschutzrechts und der Grundrechte. Zugleich zur Relevanz religiösen Säkularisats im öffentlichen Recht, Sinzheim 2001.
Ekins, Paul/ Meyer, Bernd/ Schmidt-Bleek, Friedrich/ Schneider, Friedrich: Reducing Resource Consumption. A Proposal for Global Resource and Environmental Policy, in: Angrick, Michael/ Burger, Andreas/ Lehmann, Harry (Ed.): Factor X. Policy, Strategies and Instruments for a Sustainable Resource Use, Dordrecht 2014, pp. 249 et seq.
Engel, Christoph/ Kurschilgen, Michael: The Jurisdiction of the Man Within – Introspection, Identity, and Cooperation in a Public Good Experiment, Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn 2015.
Enquête Commission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität“ des 17. Deutschen Bundestages: Schlussbericht, 2013, BT-Drs. 17/ 13300.
Esch, Tobias: Die Neurobiologie des Glücks, 2nd ed. Stuttgart 2014.
Fatheuer, Thomas/ Fuhr, Lili/ Unmüßig, Barbara: Kritik der Grünen Ökonomie, München 2015.
Fazey, Ioan et al.: Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research, Energy Research and Social Science 2018, pp. 54 et seq.
Fisahn, Andreas: Natur – Mensch – Recht. Elemente einer Theorie der Rechtsbefolgung, Berlin 1999.
Foucault, Michel: History of Madness. New York 2006.
Frey, Bruno/ Frey Marti, Claudia: Glück. Die Sicht der Ökonomie, Zürich 2010.
Friedman, Milton: Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago 1962.
Fromm, Erich: To Have or to Be, London 1996.
Fücks, Ralf: Intelligent wachsen. Die grüne Revolution, München 2013.
Giddens, Anthony: The Constitution of Society Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley 1984.
Glucksmann, André: Hass. Die Rückkehr einer elementaren Gewalt, München 2005.
Gommer, Hendrik: The Biological Foundations of Global Ethics and Law, ARSP 2014, pp. 151 et seq.
Gough, Ian: Heat, Greed and Human Need. Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing, Cheltenham 2017.
Greve, Jens: Reduktiver Individualismus. Zum Programm und zur Rechtfertigung einer sozialtheoretischen Grundposition, Wiesbaden 2015.
Gröpel, Peter/ Kehr, Hugo: Motivation and Self-Control. Implicit Motives Moderate the Exertion of Self-Control in Motive-Related Tasks, Journal of Personality 2014, pp. 317 et seq.
Habermas, Jürgen: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vol., Frankfurt a.M. 1981.
Harari, Yuval: Eine kurze Geschichte der Menschheit, München 2013.
Harari, Yuval: Homo Deus. Eine Geschichte von Morgen, München 2017.
von Harbou, Frederik: Empathie als Element einer rekonstruktiven Theorie der Menschenrechte, Baden-Baden 2014.
Hardin, Garrett: The Tragedy of the Commons, Science 1968, pp. 1243 et seq.
Hasler, Felix: Neuromythologie. Eine Streitschrift gegen die Deutungsmacht der Hirnforschung, München 2012.
Heath, Chip/ Heath, Dan: Switch, Frankfurt a.M. 2013.
Hermwille, Lukas/ Obergassel, Wolfgang/ Ott, Herrmann/ Beuermann, Christine: UNFCCC before and after Paris – what's necessary for an effective climate regime?, Climate Policy 2015, pp. 1 et seq.
Heyen, Dirk Arne/ Fischer, Corinna et al.: Mehr als nur weniger. Suffizienz – Notwendigkeit und Optionen politischer Gestaltung, Freiburg 2013, http://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/1837/2013-506-de.pdf.
Hosang, Maik/ Fraenzle, Stefan/ Markert, Bernd: Die emotionale Matrix. Grundlagen für gesellschaftlichen Wandel und nachhaltige Innovation, München 2005.
Hume, David: An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, Neuausgabe Oxford 2007.
Irrgang, Bernhard: Lehrbuch der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. Thesen, Konzeptionen und Kritik, 2. Aufl. München 2001.
Jackson, Tim: Prosperity without Growth, London 2009.
Jakob, Michael/ Edenhofer, Ottmar: Growth, Degrowth, and the Commons, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2014, 447 et seq.
Janis, Irving: Victims of Groupthink, Boston 1972.
Jellinek, Georg: Die Erklärung der Menschen- und Bürgerrechte. Ein Beitrag zur modernen Verfassungsgeschichte, Nachdruck Aalen 1996.
Jensen, Annette/ Scheub, Ute: Glücksökonomie, München 2015.
Juerges, Nataly/ Newig, Jens: What role for frames in scalar conflicts?, Land Use Policy 2015, pp. 426 et seq.
Kahneman, Daniel: Thinking – fast and slow, New York 2011.
Kim, Rakhyun/ Bosselmann, Klaus: Operationalizing Sustainable Development: Ecological Integrity as a Grundnorm of International Law, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2015, pp. 194 et seq.
Klaniecki, Kathleen/ Levention, Julia/ Abson, David: Human–nature connectedness as a ‘treatment’ for pro-environmental behavior: making the case for spatial considerations, Sustainability Science 2018, pp. 1375 et seq.
Klein, Naomi: This Changes Everything. Capitalism versus The Climate, New York 2014.
Klingholz, Reiner: Sklaven des Wachstums. Die Geschichte einer Befreiung, Frankfurt a.M. 2014.
Klinsky, Sonja/ Mehling, Michael/ Tuerk, Andreas: Beyond Déjà Vu. Opportunities for Policy Learning from Emissions Trading in Developed Countries, Carbon & Climate Law Review 2012, pp. 291 et seq.
Kloeckner, Christian: Towards a Psychology of Climate Change, in: Leal, Walter (Ed.): The Economic, Social, and Political Aspects of Climate Change, Berlin 2010, pp. 153 et seq.
Klöhn, Lars: Kapitalmarkt, Spekulation und Behavioral Finance, Berlin 2006.
Kristof, Kora: Models of Change. Einführung und Verbreitung sozialer Innovationen und gesellschaftlicher Veränderungen in transdisziplinärer Perspektive, Zürich 2010.
Kuckartz, Udo: Mixed Methods, Wiesbaden 2014.
Kuckartz, Udo: Nicht hier, nicht jetzt, nicht ich. Über die symbolische Bearbeitung eines ernsten Problems, in: Welzer, Harald/ Soeffner, Hans-Georg/ Giesecke, Dana (Ed.): Klimakulturen. Soziale Wirklichkeiten im Klimawandel, Frankfurt a.M. 2010, pp. 144 et seq.
Kühl, Stefan: Ganz normale Organisationen. Zur Soziologie des Holocaust, Berlin 2014.
Lang, Daniel/ Rode, Horst/ von Wehrden, Henrik: Methoden und Methodologie in den Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften, in: Heinrichs, Harald/ Michelsen, Gerd (Ed.): Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften, Heidelberg 2014, pp. 115 et seq.
Latour, Bruno: Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford 2005.
Liebe, Ulf: Different Routes to Explain Pro-Environmental Behaviour, Analyse & Kritik 2010, pp. 137 et seq.
Liebe, Ulf/ Preisendörfer, Peter: Für oder wider die Natur? Verhaltens- und Orientierungsmuster der Bevölkerung im Umgang mit der Natur, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 2013, pp. 239 et seq.
Liedtke, Max: Der Mensch zwischen Gefühl und Verstand – Grenzen und Chancen des rationalen (und nachhaltigen) Verhaltens, in: Korczak, Dieter (Ed.): Die emotionale Seite der Nachhaltigkeit, Kröning 2011, pp. 37 et seq.
Linz, Manfred: Weder Mangel noch Übermaß. Warum Suffizienz unentbehrlich ist, München 2012.
Luhmann, Niklas: Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt a.M. 1993.
MacCulloch, Diarmaid: Reformation – Europe’s House Divided 1490–1700, London 2004.
MacKay, David/ Cramton, Peter/ Ockenfels, Axel/ Stoft, Steve: Price Carbon – I will if you will, Nature 2015, pp. 315 et seq.
Mazar, Nina/ Zhong, Chen-Bo: Do Green Products Make Us Better People?, Psychological Science 2010, pp. 494 et seq.
Mead, George H.: Mind, Self and Society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist, Chicago 1934.
Messner, Dirk: A social contract for low carbon and sustainable development. Reflections on non-linear dynamics of social realignments and technological innovations in transformation processes, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2015, pp. 260 et seq.
Milgram, Stanley: Obedience to Authority. An Experimental View, New York 1974.
Milinski, Manfred/ Marotzke, Jochem: Das Klimaspiel. Warum scheitern Klimaverhandlungen?, in: Marotzke, Jochem/ Stratmann, Martin (Ed.): Die Zukunft des Klimas. Neue Erkenntnisse, neue Herausforderungen, München 2015, pp. 93 et seq.
Moreno, Camila/ Speich Chassé, Daniel/ Fuhr, Lili: Carbon Metrics. Global Abstractions and Ecological Epistemicide, Berlin 2015, https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2015-11-09_carbon_metrics.pdf.
Muñoz-Rubio, Julio: Sociobiology and human nature, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 2002, pp. 131 et seq.
Muraca, Barbara: Gut leben. Eine Gesellschaft jenseits des Wachstums, Bonn 2015.
Nagel, Thomas: Mind and Cosmos: why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false, New York 2012.
Neitzel, Sönke/ Welzer, Harald: Soldaten. Protokolle vom Töten und Sterben, Frankfurt a.M. 2011.
Newig, Jens et al.: Exploring Governance Learning, Environmental Science and Policy 2015, pp. 353 et seq.
Nowak, Martin/ Highfield, Roger: Kooperative Intelligenz. Das Erfolgsgeheimnis der Evolution, München 2013.
OECD: How’s Life? Measuring Wellbeing, Paris 2015.
Ostrom, Eleanor: Governing the commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge 1990.
Paech, Niko: Liberation From Excess, München 2012.
Piaget, Jean: Die Psychologie des Kindes, Olten 1972.
Radermacher, Franz Josef/ Beyers, Bert: Welt mit Zukunft. Die ökosoziale Perspektive, 2nd ed. Hamburg 2011.
Rodrik, Dani: The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy, Harvard 2012.
Rosa, Hartmut et al.: Weil Kapitalismus sich ändern muss, Wiesbaden 2014.
Russell-Smith, Jeremy/ Costanza, Robert et al.: Moving beyond evidence-free environmental policy, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 2015, pp. 441 et seq.
Santarius, Tilman: Der Rebound-Effekt. Ökonomische, psychische und soziale Herausforderungen für die Entkopplung von Wirtschaftswachstum und Energieverbrauch, Marburg 2015.
Scheidler, Fabian: Das Ende der Megamaschine. Geschichte einer scheiternden Zivilisation, Wien 2015.
Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim: Selbstverbrennung. Die fatale Dreiecksbeziehung zwischen Klima, Mensch und Kohlenstoff, München 2015.
Schneidewind, Uwe/ Zahrnt, Angelika: Damit gutes Leben einfacher wird. Perspektive einer Suffizienzpolitik, München 2013.
Scholz, Roland: Environmental Literacy in Science and Society. From Knowledge to Decisions, Cambridge 2011.
Schulz, Christian/ Bailey, Ian: The Green Economy and Post-Growth Regimes – Opportunities and Challenges for Economic Geography, Geografiska Annaler 2014, pp. 277 et seq.
Selten, Reinhard: Mit Experimenten geht es besser. Über eingeschränkte Rationalität, Wirtschaftskrise und interdisziplinäres Arbeiten, ZiF-Mitteilungen 1/ 2011, 24 et seq.
Sennett, Richard: Der flexible Mensch. Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus, Berlin 2006.
Siemer, Stefan: Nachhaltigkeit unterscheiden. Eine systemtheoretische Gegenposition zur liberalen Fundierung der Nachhaltigkeit, in: Ekardt, Felix (Ed.): Generationengerechtigkeit und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Philosophische, juristische, ökonomische, politologische und theologische Neuansätze in der Umwelt-, Sozial- und Wirtschaftspolitik, 2006, pp. 129 et seq.
Snyder, Timothy: Bloodlands. Europe between Hitler and Stalin, New York 2010.
Steinberg, Rudolf: Die Repräsentation des Volkes. Menschenbild und demokratisches Regierungssystem, Baden-Baden 2013.
Stengel, Oliver: Suffizienz. Die Konsumgesellschaft in der ökologischen Krise, München 2011.
Stiglitz, Joseph/ Sen, Amartya/ Fitoussi, Jean-Paul: Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris 2009.
Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne/ O’Riordan, Tim/ Jaeger, Carlo: The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups, Global Environmental Change 2001, pp. 117 et seq.
Tapia-Fonllem, César/ Corral-Verdugo, Victor/ Fraijo-Sing, Blanca/ Fernanda Durón-Ramos, Maria: Assessing Sustainable Behavior and its Correlates: A Measure of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Altruistic and Equitable Actions, Sustainability 2013, pp. 711 et seq.
Thornhill, Randy/ Palmer, Craig: A natural history of rape, Cambridge 2000.
Tomasello, Michael: A Natural History of Human Thinking, Harvard 2017.
Weber, Max: Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, München 2010.
Welzel, Christian: Fluchtpunkt Humanentwicklung. Über die Grundlagen der Demokratie und die Ursachen ihrer Ausbreitung, Wiesbaden 2002.
Welzer, Harald: Klimakriege. Wofür im 21. Jahrhundert getötet wird, Frankfurt a.M. 2008.
Welzer, Harald: Selbst denken. Eine Anleitung zum Widerstand, Frankfurt a.M. 2013.
Wilson, Edward: The Meaning of Human Existence, New York 2014.
Wilson, Edward: The Social Conquest of Earth, New York 2012.
Wuppertal Institut: Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland in einer globalisierten Welt, Frankfurt a.M. 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ekardt, F. (2020). Transformation to Sustainability: An Innovative Perspective on Societal Change – With and Against Sociological, Psychological, Biological, Economic and Ethnologic Findings. In: Sustainability. Environmental Humanities: Transformation, Governance, Ethics, Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19277-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19276-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19277-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)