Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meaningful Age-Friendly Design. Case Studies on Enabling Assistive Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability and User Experience (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 972))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The world population is steadily aging and the World Health Organization recently stated that 8.5% of people worldwide are aged 65 and over. This cohort is projected to account for 1.6 billion people by 2050.

Assistive Technology has been developed over previous decades with a particular aim to support people with disabilities.

With the evolution of the market and the introduction of wearable technologies and IoT-based (Internet of Things) appliances, Assistive Technology has been influenced by the discipline of Age-Friendly Design, which has been applied to meaningfully improve the autonomy of a larger segment of the population, including older people.

In order to discuss how Age-Friendly Design can influence the response of the market, and how users can better engage and benefit from Assistive Technology, this work aims to critically review, through a case study research methodology, a series of recently developed devices that have the potential to change user perception around Assistive Technology.

As a conclusion, the reported case studies represent a preliminary validation of how Age-Friendly Design can represent a meaningful solution for enabling a wider group of people with different ages and abilities. Findings show that user experience, satisfaction and Emotional Design are the key drivers for developing marketable solutions in the area of Assistive Technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Safiliou-Rotschild, C.: Are older people responsible for high healthcare costs. In: CESifo Forum - Institute for Economic Research, Munich, 1/2009, pp. 58–64 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. United Kingdom Office for Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/july2017

  3. Zigante, V.: Informal care in Europe. Exploring formalisation, availability and quality. In: Employment and Social Governance Unit A.4—Thematic Analysis London School of Economics and Political Science. European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Directorate (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Kingdom Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/harnessing-technology-to-meet-increasing-case-needs

  5. Morrar, R., Arman, H., Mousa, S.: The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): a social innovation perspective. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 7(11), 12–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose, D.H., Hasselbring, T.S., Stahl, S., Zabala, J.: Assistive technology and universal design for learning: two sides of the same coin. In: Edyburn, D., Higgins, K., Boone, R. (eds.) Handbook of Special Education Technology Research and Practice, pp. 507–511. Knowledge by Design, Inc., White Bay (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duff, P., Dolphin, C.: Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support independence for people with dementia – part 2. Technol. Disabil. 19, 79–90 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miskelly, F.G.: Assistive technology in elderly care age and ageing. Br. Geriatr. Soc. 30, 455–458 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books Inc., New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, W.A., Stronge, A.J., Fisk, A.D.: Technology and aging. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 1(1), 130–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, B.A., Pichora-Fuller, M.: Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In: Craik, F.I.M., Salthouse, T.A. (eds.) Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd edn, pp. 155–219. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuru, H., Kuru, A.: Exploring possibilities of designing virtual personal health coach in relation to gender differences. In: Design, User Experience and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services, DUXU 2014, pp. 63–71. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. WHO (World Health Organization). A Glossary of Terms for Community Health Care and Services for Older Persons. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/wkc/2004/WHO_WKC_Tech.Ser._04.2.pdf

  14. United States Government Printing Office. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-108publ364/html/PLAW-108publ364.htm

  15. GATE. Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE). http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/

  16. ISO 9999:2016 Assistive Products for Persons with Disability—Classification and Terminology, 6th edn. CEN, Brussels (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, R.O.: Technology and occupation: past, present, and the next 100 years of theory and practice. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 71, 7106150010p1–7106150010p15 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Federici, S., Scherer, M.J.: Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zion Market Research. https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/09/04/1565309/0/en/Global-Disabled-and-Elderly-Assistive-Technology-Market-Worth-USD-30-82-Billion-By-2024-Zion-Market-Research.html

  20. Tobi, H., Kampen, J.K.: Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 52(3), 1209–1225 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Blessig, L.: What is this thing called design research? In: Proceedings of 2002 International CIRP Design Seminar, Hong Kong, 16–18 May 2002, pp. 1–6 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teegavarapu, S., Summers, J., Mocko, G.: Case study method for design research: a justification. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, p. 4 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2008-49980

  24. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/blindness/GLOBALDATAFINALforweb.pdf

  25. Parette, P., Scherer, M.: Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ. Training Dev. Disabil. 39(3), 217–226 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewrick, M., Link, P., Leifer, L.J.: The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vistoe, The power of Good Design. https://www.vitsoe.com/us/about/good-design

  28. Kelly, P., Zallio, M., Duarte, B., Berry, D.: Design for enabling technologies. A framework to empower multi-level user engagement. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (ed.) International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Advances in Design for Inclusion, AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Orlando, Florida, USA, July 2018, vol. 776. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kirkland, L.: Using Neuroscience to Inform Your UX Strategy and Design, 9 July 2012. https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2012/07/using-neuroscience-to-inform-your-ux-strategy-and-design.php

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been possible through the Fulbright-Schuman Fellowship, administered by the Commission for Educational Exchange between the United States of America, Belgium and Luxembourg and jointly financed by the U.S. State Department and the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission. A joint team from Stanford University (USA) and the Technological University Dublin (Ireland) has been working under the internationally cooperation and cross-cultural principles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 424 Panama Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Matteo Zallio & Larry J. Leifer

  2. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Damon Berry

Authors
  1. Matteo Zallio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Damon Berry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larry J. Leifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Zallio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

    Tareq Ahram

  2. Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Christianne Falcão

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zallio, M., Berry, D., Leifer, L.J. (2020). Meaningful Age-Friendly Design. Case Studies on Enabling Assistive Technology. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19134-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19135-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation