Abstract
The dominant view holds that agency refers to the capacity of actors to influence the ways in which society functions, and structure refers to the social barriers that constrain this capacity to influence. Inspired by the structuration theory (Giddens 1979, 1984), introducing the notion of ‘duality of the structure’, a new framework is proposed whereby social practices are mediated by « thinking horizons » or « objects » – activities, relationships, values, images of self, and motivations – that preside over individual choices and reflexive monitoring. There are consequently five modes of action, or visible forms of the practical arrangement of daily life: entrepreneurial, relational, moral, identitary, and motivational. These modes of action are linked together and it is through this « structure of pertinences » that children give meaning to their situation on the street and develop their agency. Meanwhile, the transformability of situated agency strongly depends on the social representations of childhood in a given context.
Keywords
Updated from Stoecklin 2018b, with permission by The International Journal of Children’s Rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In French ‘réductions au carré’.
- 2.
Stoecklin, The participatory capability of children in street situations in Brazil and China. A four-year project (starting in 2019) supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No 10001A_179098).
- 3.
The English version appeared in the publication of 2013. I mainly refer here to this publication.
- 4.
« Black children » (undeclared).
- 5.
Translation by the author.
- 6.
This is the physical origin of the application of the notion of resilience in social sciences (see Cyrulnik and Jorlan 2012).
References
Aptekar, L., & Stoecklin, D. (2014). Street children and homeless youth: A cross-cultural perspective. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New-York: The Free Press.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2014). Social policy and the changing concept of child well-being: The role of international studies and children as active participants. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60. Jg., Heft 4. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa, S. 569–581.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New-York: Anchor Books.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Blumer, H. (1979). Symbolic interaction. In H. Robboy, S. L. Greenblatt, & C. Clark (Eds.), Social interaction. Introductory readings in sociology. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard, NRF essais.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Cheng, F. (2008). Negotiating exclusion: An ethnographic study of the street children in Shanghai, China. Hong-Kong: University of Hong-Kong (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Cheng, F. (2009a). The efficiency of Chinese welfare policy for street children: A perspective of the street children. Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 11.
Cheng, F. (2009b). Failure of the traditional childcare model and the causes of street children: An ethnographic study of the street children in the Shanghai Railway Station neighborhood. Society, 5(8).
Cheng, F., & Lam, D. (2010). How is street life? An examination of the subjective wellbeing of street children in China. International Social Work, 53(3), 353–365.
Costey, P. (2004). Pierre Bourdieu, penseur de la pratique. Tracés. Revue de sciences humaines, 7, 11–25. Online since 21 January 2009, connection on 08 August 2018. http://journals.openedition.org/traces/2773. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.2773.
Côté, J.-F. (2015). George Herbert Mead’s concept of society. A critical reconstruction. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Cusson, M. (1981). Délinquants, pourquoi? Paris: Colin.
Cyrulnik, B., & Jorlan, G. (2012). Résilience. Connaissances de base. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Dewey, J. (1991). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 12). Carbondale: SIU Press. (Originally published in 1938 by N.Y. D.C.: Heath & Co).
Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
Elias, N. (1991). The symbol theory. London: Sage.
Esser, F., Baader, M. S., Betz, T., & Hungerland, B. (2016). Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies. New-York: Routledge.
Gao, Y., Atkinson-Sheppard, S., Yu, Y., & Xiong, G. (2018). A review of the National Policies on street children in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.009.
Garnier, P. (2015). L’“agency” des enfants. Projet scientifique et politique des “childhood studies”. Education et sociétés, 36(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.3917/es.036.0159.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lange, F. A. (1950). The history of materialism. New-York: Humanities Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Le Breton, D. (2004). L’interactionnisme symbolique. Paris: Quadrige/PUF.
Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance. Social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Leonard, M. (2016). The sociology of children, childhood and generation. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC: Sage.
Lucchini, R. (1985). Drogues et société. Essai sur la toxicodépendance. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg.
Lucchini, R. (1993). Enfant de la rue. Identité, sociabilité, drogue. Genève/Paris: Droz.
Lucchini, R. (1996). Sociologie de la survie. L’enfant dans la rue. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Martindale, D. (1960). The nature and types of sociological theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: Charles W. Morris.
Mead, G. H. (1963). L’esprit, le soi et la société. Paris: PUF (Translation from the 1934 original version in English).
Nizet, J. (2007). La sociologie de Anthony Giddens. Paris: La Découverte.
Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children. From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
Raithelhuber, E. (2016). Extending agency. The merit of relational approaches for childhood studies. In F. Esser, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood : New perspectives in childhood studies. New-York: Routledge.
Rees, G., Andresen, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2016). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 16 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds survey of children aged eight years old, 2013–15. York: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB, www.isciweb.org).
Samusocial International. (2014). La Suradaptation paradoxale. Une notion clé dans l’abord clinique et psychopathologique des enfants et jeunes de la rue. Cahier thématique. Paris: Agence française de développement.
Shils, E. A., & Finch, H. A. (1997). The methodology of the social sciences (1903–17). New-York: Free Press.
Stoecklin, D. (2000). Enfants des rues en Chine. Paris: Karthala.
Stoecklin, D. (2009). L’enfant acteur et l’approche participative. In J. Zermatten & D. Stoecklin (Eds.), Le droit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique : contribution à un nouveau contrat social (pp. 47–71). Sion: IUKB/IDE.
Stoecklin, D. (2013). Theories of action in the field of child participation. In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood, 20(4), 443–457.
Stoecklin, D. (2015). Vulnérabilité et capabilité de l’enfant. Dans: Promotion et défense des droits de l’enfant: Enjeux théoriques, pratiques et philosophiques. Université de Genève: Global Studies Institute, pp. 33–43.
Stoecklin, D. (2018a). Freely expressed views: Methodological challenges for the right of the child to be heard. Child Indicators Research. Article first published online: February 5, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6.
Stoecklin, D. (2018b). Institutionalisation of Children’s rights: Transformability and situated agency. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 26(3), 548–587.
Stoecklin, D., & Fattore, T. (2018). Children’s multidimensional agency: insights into the structuration of choice. Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research. 25(1), 47–62. Article first published online: November 29, 2017; Issue published: February 1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568217743557.
Thomas, N., & Stoecklin, D. (2018) Recognition and capability: A new way to understand how children can achieve their rights? In: C. Baraldi & T. Cockburn (Eds.), Theorising childhood. citizenship, rights, and participation. Palgrave McMillan, Studies in Childhood and Youth, pp. 73–94. isbn: 978–3–319-72672-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1.
UNCRC. (2017). General Comment No. 21 (2017) on Children in Street Situations. CRC/C/GC/21. https://www.crcasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/G1717034.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
Weber, M. (1978a). The foundations of social theory, 1. The nature of social action. In W. G. Runciman (Ed.), Max Weber: Selections in translation. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1978b). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wyness, M. (2018). Childhood culture and society in a global context. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoecklin, D. (2020). The Agency of Children in Street Situations. In: Children in Street Situations. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19040-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19040-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19039-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19040-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)