Abstract
Image guidance (IG) can serve as a very important adjunct to the surgeon during minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). There is robust data showing that IG decreases the incidence of suboptimal screw placement and more recent data that IG may decrease the incidence of neurological complications and need for reoperations following thoracolumbar instrumentation while improving workflow. IG is invaluable in cases of severe deformity or other altered anatomy as well as for the intraoperative training of residents and fellows. Indications for its use continue to expand with a growing body of literature justifying its use in not only guiding thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement but also cervical and pelvic instrumentation as well as spinal tumor resection. IG offers the further benefit of minimizing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the surgeon and OR staff. Future studies will help to modify imaging protocols in IG to also minimize patients’ radiation exposure.
As the use of IG in spine surgery continues to expand, its value in improving surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes must be weighed against concerns over cost and radiation exposure. Our personal experience has shown the technology to be both efficient and cost-effective by reducing screw revision rates and reducing occupational radiation exposures. Further research will continue to clarify the answers to these questions and better delineate situations where IG may be particularly beneficial in spine surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine. 2001;26:2049–57.
Beck M, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P, Harms C, Gradl G. Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2009;18:1469–77.
Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2010;19:370–5.
Tian N-F, Xu H-Z. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2009;33:895–903.
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2007;32:E111–20.
Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2012;21:247–55.
Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, Rajpal S, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:196–203.
Modi HN, Suh S-W, Hong J-Y, Yang J-H. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw using ideal pedicle entry point in severe scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:1830–7.
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine. 2004;29:333–42.. discussion 342
Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick A-M, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:170–8; discussion 178.
Karapinar L, Erel N, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kaya A. Pedicle screw placement with a free hand technique in thoracolumbar spine: is it safe? J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:63–7.
Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1519–28.
Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2000;9:235–40.
Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine. 2007;32:E56–64.
Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, Reichert T, Koeppert H, Gutberlet M. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2011;20:875–81.
Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavalleé S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:39–48.
Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Sanders PC, Santos ERG, Ledonio CGT, Polly DW. Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation. Spine. 2013;38:E251–8.
Luo TD, Polly DW, Ledonio CG, Wetjen NM, Larson AN. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in children 10 years or younger using navigation and intraoperative CT. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29:E135–8.
Baghdadi YMK, Larson AN, McIntosh AL, Shaughnessy WJ, Dekutoski MB, Stans AA. Complications of pedicle screws in children 10 years or younger: a case control study. Spine. 2013;38:E386–93.
Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T. The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine. 2005;30:2800–5.
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Nakashima H, et al. Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2009;18:1293–9.
Shimokawa N, Takami T. Surgical safety of cervical pedicle screw placement with computer navigation system. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:251–8.
Ishikawa Y, Kanemura T, Yoshida G, Matsumoto A, Ito Z, Tauchi R, et al. Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:472–8.
Theologis AA, Burch S. Safety and efficacy of reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology using pedicle screws inserted with stealth navigation and 3D image-guided (O-arm) technology. Spine. 2015;40:1397–406.
Kovanda TJ, Ansari SF, Qaiser R, Fulkerson DH. Feasibility of CT-based intraoperative 3D stereotactic image-guided navigation in the upper cervical spine of children 10 years of age or younger: initial experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16:1–9.
Xiao R, Miller JA, Sabharwal NC, Lubelski D, Alentado VJ, Healy AT, et al. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:628–37.
Watkins RG, Gupta A, Watkins RG. Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery. Open Orthop J. 2010;4:228–33.
Khanna AR, Yanamadala V, Coumans J-V. Effect of intraoperative navigation on operative time in 1-level lumbar fusion surgery. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas. 2016;32:72–6.
Park P. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based spinal navigation in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: feasibility, technique, and initial results. Neurosurgery. 2015;11(Suppl 2):259–67.
Joseph JR, Smith BW, Patel RD, Park P. Use of 3D CT-based navigation in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:339–44.
Drazin D, Liu JC, Acosta FL Jr. CT navigated lateral interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:1438–41.
Geisler F. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint with the SI-bone surgical technique. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(2 Suppl):Video 8.
Lorio MP, Polly DW, Ninkovic I, Ledonio CGT, Hallas K, Andersson G. Utilization of minimally invasive surgical approach for sacroiliac joint fusion in surgeon population of ISASS and SMISS membership. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:1–6.
Lee DJ, Kim S-B, Rosenthal P, Panchal RR, Kim KD. Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion. J Biomed Res. 2016;30:162–7.
Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, Balseiro S, Fenton D. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2010;10:595–601.
Ray WZ, Ravindra VM, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Stereotactic navigation with the O-arm for placement of S-2 alar iliac screws in pelvic lumbar fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18:490–5.
Shin JH, Hoh DJ, Kalfas IH. Iliac screw fixation using computer-assisted computer tomographic image guidance: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:16–20; discussion 20.
Nagashima H, Nishi T, Yamane K, Tanida A. Case report: osteoid osteoma of the C2 pedicle: surgical technique using a navigation system. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:283–8.
Mori K, Neo M, Takemoto M, Nishizawa K, Imai S. Navigated pin-point approach to osteoid osteoma adjacent to the facet joint of spine. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:158–63.
Van Royen BJ, Baayen JC, Pijpers R, Noske DP, Schakenraad D, Wuisman PIJM. Osteoid osteoma of the spine: a novel technique using combined computer-assisted and gamma probe-guided high-speed intralesional drill excision. Spine. 2005;30:369–73.
Moore T, McLain RF. Image-guided surgery in resection of benign cervicothoracic spinal tumors: a report of two cases. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2005;5:109–14.
Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Takemoto M, Ota M, Nakayama T, Toguchida J, et al. Computer-assisted spinal osteotomy: a technical note and report of four cases. Spine. 2010;35:E895–903.
Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U, Schipper J, Spetzger U. Navigated transoral approach to the cranial base and the craniocervical junction: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:247–50; discussion 251.
Zong S, Wu Y, Tao Y, Chen X, Fang Y, Du L, et al. Treatment results in different surgical approaches for intraspinal tumor in 51 patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:16627–33.
Maduri R, Bobinski L, Duff JM. Image Merge Tailored Access Resection (IMTAR) of spinal Intradural tumors. Technical report of 13 cases. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:594–602.
Nasser R, Drazin D, Nakhla J, Al-Khouja L, Brien E, Baron EM, et al. Resection of spinal column tumors utilizing image-guided navigation: a multicenter analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41:E15.
Lian X, Navarro-Ramirez R, Berlin C, Jada A, Moriguchi Y, Zhang Q, et al. Total 3D Airo® navigation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5027340.
Nooh A, Lubov J, Aoude A, Aldebeyan S, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, et al. Differences between manufacturers of computed tomography–based computer-assisted surgery systems do exist. Glob Spine J. 2017;7:83–94.
Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot Off J Soc Radiol Prot. 2008;28:161–8.
Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, Tunner V, Malone R, Ghosh S. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:570–3.
Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine. 2000;25:2637–45.
Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:532–7.
Abul-Kasim K, Söderberg M, Selariu E, Gunnarsson M, Kherad M, Ohlin A. Optimization of radiation exposure and image quality of the cone-beam O-arm intraoperative imaging system in spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:52–8.
Izadpanah K, Konrad G, Südkamp NP, Oberst M. Computer navigation in balloon kyphoplasty reduces the intraoperative radiation exposure. Spine. 2009;34:1325–9.
Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiology. 2004;232:701–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Quiz Questions
True/False
-
1.
While a number of studies have shown that image guidance increases thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement accuracy, there are currently no studies that have shown an improvement in clinical outcomes when compared to either freehand or two-dimensional fluoroscopic techniques.
-
2.
Older image guidance systems used a patient’s preoperative CT scan which required intraoperative registration to specific anatomic landmarks in order to provide real-time navigation.
-
3.
Intraoperative multi-slice helical CT scan provides better soft tissue resolution than cone-beam three-dimensional fluoroscopy.
-
4.
Research has conclusively shown that image guidance systems reduce radiation exposure to both the surgeon and the patient in comparison to two-dimensional fluoroscopic techniques.
Answers
-
1.
False
-
2.
True
-
3.
True
-
4.
False
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kochanski, R.B., Alahmadi, H., O’Toole, J.E. (2019). Image Guidance in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. In: Phillips, F., Lieberman, I., Polly Jr., D., Wang, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19007-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19007-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19006-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19007-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)