Skip to main content

‘We Are Fantasising Imaginative Animals’ (MGM Chapter 11)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals’s Chapter XI on imagination is central to the book. It is physically located (almost) in the middle and considers a central faculty, or central faculties, in Murdoch’s philosophy: imagination and fantasy. The chapter begins with in-depth, original discussions of Immanuel Kant and Plato’s understanding of imagination. These discussions are not easy to follow. One of my aims here is to reconstruct Murdoch’s argument through close text reading, explaining some of the terminology and adding missing elements. Another aim is to relate the remaining sections of this chapter to the earlier discussion of Kant and Plato. However, I begin by briefly exploring my own reading experience of MGM and suggesting some solutions to the difficulties experienced when reading the work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antonaccio, M., and W. Schweiker (eds.). 1996. Iris Murdoch and the search for human goodness. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altorf, M. 2008. Iris Murdoch and the art of imagining. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, M. 2018. ‘The extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real’: Iris Murdoch on love and moral agency. European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1): 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Doeuff, M. 2002. The philosophical imaginary. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, M.M. 2017. Love, respect, and individuals: Murdoch as a guide to Kantian ethics. European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4): 1844–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. 1993. Review of metaphysics as a guide to morals. Philosophical Investigations 16 (4): 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. 1997. Constructing a hall of reflection: Perfectionist edification in Iris Murdoch’s metaphysics as a guide to morals. Philosophy 72 (280): 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1986. Ethics and imagination. Irish Theological Quarterly 52 (1–2): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1993. Metaphysics as a guide to morals (Abbreviated MGM). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. 1997. Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1988. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Kritische Studienausgabe 5. Herausgegeben von G. Colli und M. Montinari. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. 1976. Imagination. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Altorf, H.M. (2019). ‘We Are Fantasising Imaginative Animals’ (MGM Chapter 11). In: Hämäläinen, N., Dooley, G. (eds) Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics