Abstract
Feng shui energy is yet to be identified and measured in any reputable laboratory. There have been some embryonic steps towards scientific validation of chi claims. Of special interest were those made by Dr Yan Xin, a former TCM practitioner who had worked in or visited different Chinese and US universities. Despite detailed and staggering claims made by Dr Xin and colleagues, none have ever survived a reputable test. One fallback option for chi theorists who wish to maintain the scientificity of their system and of the chi construct, yet who also acknowledge the reality that chi has never yet been found or measured, is to abandon the referential dimension of chi and to swing over to seeing chi as an intervening variable not a hypothetical construct. The final option for chi theorists who wish to retain the concept, while acknowledging that there is no non-inferential, immediate evidence for it, is to say that chi talk is metaphorical not literal. For the purpose of this book, these fundamental philosophical arguments need just be noted, not solved. Students and teachers can themselves, with time and curricula allowing, follow up the arguments and literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Lu Zuyin was a renowned professor of nuclear physics at the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, as well as a physics professor at Tsinghua University. He was responsible for the comprehensive planning of nuclear physics parameter measurements during China’s nuclear tests, and he led the effort of measuring the forces, neutron fields, and gamma fields of atomic bombs in China.
- 3.
All of these, and more, extraordinary things are related by Vicente Ongtenco, a council member of the World Medical Qigong Association, and detailed in Wozniak et al. (2001, pp. 127–132).
- 4.
- 5.
The authors’ institutional affiliations included Harvard University, Mass General Hospital, University of Oklahoma, MIT, and the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
- 6.
Unfortunately Dr Yan seems unable to take further part in such testing. At some time around 2000, he was made a ‘national treasure’ by the Chinese government, and his travel and appearances have been constrained. How much this was a result of doing bad science and how much it was the party’s fear of a mass qigong movement, are unknown.
See https://www.thedaobums.com/topic/30754-what-became-of-qigong-master-yan-xin/
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
It should be noted that the publisher is ‘a small specialist publisher’.
- 10.
- 11.
For a report on these fraudsters, see Chinese Global Times, 19 August 2013.
- 12.
- 13.
See essays in any anthology on the realism/instrumentalism debate in philosophy of science. For a recent collection, see Agazzi (2017).
- 14.
See at least the 23 chapters in Selin (2003).
- 15.
- 16.
See, at least, Graham (1989).
- 17.
- 18.
The rich philosophical literature on the methodological and ontological presuppositions, if any, of science is reviewed in Fishman and Boudry (2013).
- 19.
- 20.
In 1974 it was still required reading in the Sydney University honours psychology programme.
- 21.
Bas van Fraassen is one well-known defender of this position (Fraassen 2002).
- 22.
- 23.
References
Agazzi, E. (Ed.). (2017). Varieties of scientific realism: Objectivity and truth in science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Alston, W. P. (1996). A realist conception of truth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Andersen, K. (2017). Fantasyland: How America went Haywire, a 500-year history. London: Ebury Press.
Beinfield, H., & Korngold, E. (1991). Between heaven and earth: A guide to Chinese medicine. New York: Random House.
Bevilacqua, F. (2014b). Energy: Learning from the past. Science & Education, 23(6), 1231–1243.
Beyerstein, B. L., & Sampson, W. (1996b). Traditional medicine and pseudoscience in China: A report of the second CSICOP delegation (part 2). Skeptical Inquirer, 20(5). https://www.csicop.org/si/show/china_conference_2
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2012). Grist to the mill of anti-evolutionism: The failed strategy of ruling the supernatural out of science by philosophical fiat. Science & Education, 21, 1151–1165.
Bunge, M. (2001). Philosophy in crisis: The need for reconstruction. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bunge, M. (2006). Chasing reality: Strife over realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bunge, M. (2009). Advantages and limits of naturalism. In J. R. Shook & P. Kurtz (Eds.), The future of naturalism (pp. 43–63). Amherst: Humanity Books.
Bunge, M. (2012a). Evaluating philosophies (Boston studies in the philosophy of science) (Vol. 295). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bunge, M. (2012b). The correspondence theory of truth. Semiotica, 188, 65–76.
Chen, K. (2002). Review of Lu Zuyin ‘Scientific Qigong exploration: The wonders and mysteries of Qi’. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 16(3), 483–489.
Coopersmith, J. (2010). Energy, the subtle concept: The discovery of Feynman’s blocks from Leibniz to Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cross, T. (2005). What is a disposition? Synthese, 144, 321–341.
Devitt, M. (1991). Realism & truth (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961/1986). The mechanization of the world picture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dikotter, F. (2010). Mao’s great famine: The history of China’s most devastating catastrophe 1958–1962. New York: Bloomsbury.
Duit, R. (1991). The role of analogy and metaphor in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.
Eitel, E. J. (1873/1987). Feng shui: The rudiments of natural science in China. Hong Kong: Lane Crawford (Graham Brash, Singapore).
Fang, L. (2016). The most wanted man in China: My journey from scientist to enemy of the state (P. Link, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. London: New Left Books.
Fishman, Y. I. (2009). Can science test supernatural worldviews? Science & Education, 18(6–7), 813–837.
Fishman, Y. I., & Boudry, M. (2013). Does science presuppose naturalism (or, indeed, anything at all)? Science & Education, 22(5), 921–949.
Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106, 16–22. Reprinted in R. Pennock (ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001, 737–749.
Graham, A. C. (1989). Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. LaSalle: Open Court.
Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (1976). Can theories be refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine thesis. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Harman, P. M. (1982). Energy, force and matter: The conceptual development of nineteenth-century physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harré, R. (1964). Matter and method. London: Macmillan.
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hintikka, J. (Ed.). (1994). Aspects of metaphor. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Holton, G. (1986). Metaphors in science and education. InThe advancement of science and its burdens (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huston, P. (1995). China, chi and chicanary: Examining traditional Chinese medicine and chi theory. Skeptical Inquirer, 19(5), 38–42.
Joravsky, D. (1970). The Lysenko affair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2000). Chinese medicine: The web that has no weaver. London: Rider.
Kovoor, A. (1978). Begone godmen! Encounters with spiritual frauds. Mumbai: Jaico.
Li, Z. (1996). The private life of chairman Mao: The memoirs of Mao’s personal physician. New York: Random House.
Lin, Z. X., Yu, L., Guo, Y. Z., Zhang, H. L., Shen, Z. Y., & Zhang, T. L. (2000). Qigong: Chinese medicine or pseudoscience? Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Liu, J. L. (2015). In defense of Chinese Qi-naturalism. In C. Li, F. Perkins, K. Alan, & L. Chan (Eds.), Chinese metaphysics and its problems (pp. 33–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lu, Z. (1997). Scientific Qigong exploration: The wonders and mysteries of Qi. Malvern: Amber Leaf Press.
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.
Machamer, P. (2000). The nature of metaphor and scientific descriptions. In F. Hallyn (Ed.), Metaphor and analogy in the sciences (pp. 35–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Puüishers.
Mahner, M. (2012). The role of metaphysical naturalism in science. Science & Education, 21(10), 1437–1459.
Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism and science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Matthews, M. R. (2000). Constructivism in science and mathematics education. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), National society for the study of education, 99th yearbook (pp. 161–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Matthews, M. R. (2012). Philosophical and pedagogical problems with constructivism in science education. Tréma, 38, 41–56.
Matthews, M. R. (2015a). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science: 20th anniversary revised and enlarged edition. New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M. R. (2015b). Reflections on 25-years of journal editorship. Science & Education, 24(5–6), 749–805.
McCarthy, C. L. (2018). Cultural studies of science education: An appraisal. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives (pp. 99–136). Dordrecht: Springer.
National Academy of Science (NAS). (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pellegrino-Estich, R. (2001). The miracle man: The life story of Joao de Deus. Cairns: Triad Publishers.
Pennock, R. T. (1999). Tower of Babel: The evidence against the new creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Randi, J. (1987). The faith healers. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
Randi, J. (1992). Conjuring: Being a definitive history of the venerable arts of sorcery, prestidigitation, wizardry, deception, & chicanery, and of the mountebanks & scoundrels who have perpetrated these subterfuges on a bewildered public, in short, MAGIC! New York: St Martin’s Press.
Randi, J. (1995). An encyclopedia of claims, frauds, and hoaxes of the occult and supernatural. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ricci, M. (1615/1953). On the Christian mission among the Chinese. In L. L. Gallagher (Ed.), China in the sixteenth century: The journals of Matthew Ricci (pp. 1583–1610). New York: Random House.
Sampson, W. (1996). Antiscience trends in the rise of the “alternative medicine” movement. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, & M. W. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 188–197). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schimmel, S. (2008). The tenacity of unreasonable beliefs: Fundamentalism and the fear of truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schofield, R. E. (1970). Mechanism and materialism: British natural philosophy in an age of reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Selin, H. (Ed.). (2003). Nature across cultures: Views of nature and the environment in non-Western cultures. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sherman, T. F. (2018). Energy, entropy, and the flow of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slezak, P. (2012). Review of Michael Ruse Science and spirituality: Making room for faith in the age of science. Science & Education, 21, 403–413.
Stenger, V. J. (1990). Physics and psychics: The search for a world beyond the senses. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Stenger, V. J. (2007). God: The failed hypothesis: How science shows that god does not exist. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Stoljar, D. (2010). Physicalism. New York: Routledge.
Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science and mathematics education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Tobin, K. (2000). Constructivism in science education: Moving on. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education (pp. 227–253). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Tobin, K. (2015). Connecting science education to a world in crisis. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-015-0003-z.
Too, L. (1998). Essential feng shui: A step-by step guide to enhancing your relationships, health and prosperity. London: Random House.
van Fraassen, B. C. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Weinert, F. (1995). The Duhem-Quine thesis revisited. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 147–156.
Westfall, R. S. (1971). The construction of modern science: Mechanisms and mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wicker, C. (2005). Not in Kansas anymore: A curious tale of how magic is transforming America. New York: HarperCollins.
Wozniak, J. A., Wu, S., & Wang, H. (2001). Yan Xin Qigong and contemporary sciences. Champaign: International Yan Xin Qigong Association.
Yan, X., Lu, F., Jiang, H., Cao, W., Xia, Z., Shen, H., Wang, J., Dao, M., Lin, H., & Zhu, R. (2002). Journal of Scientific Exploration, 16(3), 381–411.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthews, M.R. (2019). Scientific Testing of Chi (Qi) Claims. In: Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18822-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18822-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18821-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18822-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)