Skip to main content

Early Childhood Development in South Africa: Inequality and Opportunity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality

Abstract

In South Africa the majority of young children are adversely impacted by a range of social and economic inequalities. Apartheid, along with the resultant socio-economic inequalities, deprived most South African children of their fundamental socio-economic rights, including their right to early education. Global evidence shows early childhood development (ECD) interventions can protect children against the effects of poverty; and that investment in quality ECD programmes for young children has a significant effect on reducing poverty and inequality across society. Currently children in South Africa are exposed to significant variation in the distribution and quality of ECD programmes. This chapter reviews the most up-to-date data on the current inequalities in ECD in South Africa, in relation to age, race, gender, location, and income levels; and examines current provision rates and differences in quality; data which has, up to now, not been synthesised in this way. The chapter explores the consequences of inequality, and why this inequality persists. To bring about equality for young children, a number of government actions are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the purposes of this chapter, Early Childhood Development (ECD) refers to the physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional development of a child from conception up until the age of six.

  2. 2.

    In South Africa there are generally five racial categories by which people can classify themselves, the last of which is “Unspecified/Other”. The other four categories comprise Black African; White; Coloured; Indian/Asian. Population estimates in 2016 showed that of the total South African population (55.9 million people), 80.7% were Black African, 8.8% were Coloured, 8.1% were White, and 2.5% were Indian/Asian (Statistics South Africa [StatsSA] 2015).

  3. 3.

    Income quintiles refer to the classification of household income according to five quintiles; with Quintile 1 being the poorest 20% of the country’s population and Quintile 5 being the wealthiest 20% of the country’s population.

  4. 4.

    Due to low levels of access to ECD centres across South Africa, for vulnerable children, different types of ECD programmes have been designed to fill the gap. Non-centre-based programmes, as the name suggests, comprise “any ECD programme, service or intervention provided to children from birth until the year before they enter formal school, with the intention to promote the child’s early emotional, cognitive, sensory, spiritual, moral, physical, social and communication development and early learning” (Republic of South Africa [RSA] 2015b, p. 13). These programmes include informal playgroups, toy libraries, as well as family outreach programmes that are specifically designed to support and guide parents and caregivers on early learning stimulation and development of their young children. These programmes are cost-effective in reaching the most marginalised children who cannot afford to access formal centre-based ECD interventions (van Niekerk et al. 2017).

  5. 5.

    It is important to note here that figures reflecting averages can mask disparities within groups, but are presented here in order to assess the performance of the country and the inequalities that currently exist in the ECD field.

  6. 6.

    In most countries across the globe, fewer than half of children in the 3–5 age cohort attend an early learning programme (United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF] 2016), and as such, whilst 63% in not high enough, it is in the upper percentiles, globally.

  7. 7.

    This finding is expected, as high service uptake is not generally expected in the 0–2 age cohort unless day care needs are high, such as in urban provinces, where caregivers are more likely to be working outside of the home.

  8. 8.

    This could be due to various reasons including need for day-care, employment and affordability.

  9. 9.

    The data for 2016 and 2017 were not finalised at the time of writing, and as such were not available.

  10. 10.

    It is important to note here that Grade R provision rates in South Africa are set to increase over the next few years, with the aim of reaching full provision by 2019; an admirable objective, but according to the data this is highly unlikely.

  11. 11.

    Researchers have found that Grade R teachers are relatively un- and under-qualified, with only two-thirds of teachers in Grade R classes in ordinary schools having obtained a Grade 12 certificate, and only around 20% holding a degree; (Gustafsson 2017)

  12. 12.

    This is based on data obtained from the 2014 Department of Social Development (DSD) and Economic Policy Research Institute (EPRI) ‘Audit of Early Childhood Development (ECD) Centres’ report, and as such reflects an underrepresentation of ECD centres in the country. As such, it is important to look at the differences in enrolment rate figures and not at the raw percentage data.

References

  • Atmore, E., van Niekerk, L., & Ashley-Cooper, M. (2012). Challenges facing the early childhood development sector in South Africa. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 2(1), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C. (2017). Sources of inequality in South African early child development services. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aughinbaugh, A., & Gittleman, M. (2003). Does money matter? A comparison of the effect of income on child development in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Human Resources, 38(2), 416–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S. (2008). Preschool education and its lasting effects: Research and policy implications. Available via: Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit http://epicpolicy.org/publication/preschooleducation. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

  • Biersteker, L. (2017). Quality ECD: What does it take to shift early learning outcomes? Presentation at Education Fishtank workshop, Cape Town, South Africa, 3 Aug 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, L., Hendricks, S. (2012). Audit of unregistered ECD sites in the Western Province 2011. Report to the Western Cape Department of Social Development Western Cape (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, L., & Picken, P. (2013). Report on a survey of non-profit organisations providing training for ECD programmes and services (birth to four years). Cape Town: Ilifa Labantwana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, L., Dawes, A., Hendricks, L., & Tredoux, C. (2016). Center-based early childhood care and education program quality: A South African study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 334–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M., Zaslow, M., Tarullo, L., & Martinez-Beck, I. (2016). Quality thresholds, features, and dosage in early care and education: Secondary data analyses of child outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(2), serial No. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R. Jr., Zeisel, S. A., Neebe, E., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating quality of center-based child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Development, 71(2), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, A., Biersteker, L., & Hendricks, L. (2012). Towards integrated early childhood development. An evaluation of the Sobambisana initiative. Available via The DG Murray Trust http://www.educationinnovations.org/sites/default/files/Sobambisana. Accessed 11 December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, A., Biersteker, L., Girdwood, E., Snelling, M., & Tedoux, C. (2016). Early learning outcomes measure. Technical manual. Cape Town: The Innovation Edge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBE, DSD and UNICEF. (2011). Tracking public expenditure and assessing service quality in early childhood development in South Africa. Available via UNICEF https://www.unicef.org/southafrica/SAF_resources_pets.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2017.

  • Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2015). School realities 2015, EMIS15/2/011. Republic of South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2016). School realities 2016, EMIS16/2/012. Republic of South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2001). The national audit of ECD provisioning in South Africa. Department of Education, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, M. (2017). Enrolments, staffing, financing and the quality of service delivery in early childhood institutions. South Africa (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, M., et al. (2010). Policy note on pre-primary schooling: An empirical contribution to the 2009 medium term strategic framework. Stellenbosch economic working papers 05/10 Department of Economics and Bureau for Economic Research, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., Sambu, W., & Berry, L. (2014). Early childhood development: A statistical brief. Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town and Ilifa Labantwana, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., Sambu, W., Berry, L., Giese, S., & Almeleh, C. (2016). South African Early Childhood Review 2016. Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town and Ilifa Labantwana, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., Sambu, W., Berry, L., Giese, S., & Almeleh, C. (2017). South African Early Childhood Review 2017. Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town and Ilifa Labantwana, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartinger, S. M., Lanata, C. F., Hattendorf, J., Wolf, J., Gil, A. I., Obando, M. O., Noblega, M., Verastegui, H., & Mäusezahl, D. (2017). Impact of a child stimulation intervention on early child development in Rural Peru: A cluster randomised trial using a reciprocal control design. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(3), 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., Moon, S. H., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A., & Yavitz, A. (2010). The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. (2001). Explaining non-change in education reform after apartheid: Political symbolism and the problem of policy implementation. In J. Jansen & Y. Sayed (Eds.), Implementing Education Policies: The South African experience. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. D., & Sayed, Y. (2001). Implementing education policies: The South African experience. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. M., Harrison, L., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Ross, C., Ungerer, J. A., Raikes, H., Brady-Smith, C., Boller, K., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Child care quality matters: How conclusions may vary with context. Child Development, 74(4), 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa [RSA]. (2015a). Intergovernmental fiscal reviews (IGFR) 2015: Provincial Budgets and expenditure review 2010/11–2016/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa [RSA]. (2015b). National integrated early childhood development policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, L., & Naicker, S. (2013). A review of published literature on supporting and strengthening child-caregiver relationships (parenting). Arlington, VA: USAID’s AIDS Support and Technical Assistance Resources, AIDSTAR-One, Task Order 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Codina, M., Attanasio, O., Meghir, C., Varela, N., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2015). The socioeconomic gradient of child development: Cross-sectional evidence from children 6–42 months in Bogota. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 464–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J., Levitt, P., Fox, N., Bunge, S., Cameron, J., Duncan, G., et al. (2016). From best practices to breakthrough impacts: A science-based approach for building a more promising future for young children and families. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Center on the Developing Child.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern and Eastern African Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality [SACMEQ]. (2011). Learner preschool exposure and achievement in South Africa. Policy brief no 4 Ministry of Basic Education, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2003). General Household Survey 2002. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2010). General Household Survey 2009. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2015). General Household Survey 2014. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2016a). General Household Survey 2015. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2016b). Mid-year population estimates 2016. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2017a). Mid-year Population Estimates 2017. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa [StatsSA]. (2017b). General Household Survey 2016. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2014). Early Childhood Development: A statistical snapshot – Building better brains and sustainable outcomes for children (p. 7). UNICEF, New York, Sept 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2016). The State of the World’s Children 2016. Available via: UNICEF https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/UNICEF_SOWC_2016.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations [UN]. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/Res/70/1). UN General Assembly, New York Accessed from http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org.ezproxy.uct.ac.za. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Berg, S., Girdwood, E., Shepherd, D., van Wyk, C., Kruger, J., & Viljoen, J. (2013). The impact of the introduction of Grade R on learning outcomes. Report to Department of Basic Education and Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the Presidency University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gaag, J., & Putcha, V. (2015). Investing in early childhood development: What is being spent, and what does it cost? Bookings Global Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niekerk, L., Ashley-Cooper, M., & Atmore, E. (2017). Effective early childhood development programme options meeting the needs of young South African children. Centre for Early Childhood Development, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldehanna, T., & Gebremedhin, L. (2002). The effects of pre-school attendance on the cognitive development of urban children aged 5 and 8 years: evidence from ethiopia. Young Lives Working Paper 8 Oxford Department of International Development (ODID), University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar, S., Sikander, S., Haq, Z., Hill, Z., Lingam, R., Skordis-Worrall, J., Hafeez, A., Kirkwood, B., & Rahman, A. (2014). Integrating maternal psychosocial well-being into a child-development intervention: The five-pillars approach. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1308(1), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Ashley-Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ashley-Cooper, M., van Niekerk, LJ., Atmore, E. (2019). Early Childhood Development in South Africa: Inequality and Opportunity. In: Spaull, N., Jansen, J. (eds) South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18810-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18811-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics